Re: [solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-09 Thread Peter Gueckel
suvayu ali wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 18:55, Peter Gueckel wrote: >> I was... referring to the majority of... Fedora users. > > What makes you think that is true? I would actually expect it to be > otherwise. In any case, a distribution like Fedora cannot afford to > make assumptions like t

Re: [solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-09 Thread suvayu ali
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 18:55, Peter Gueckel wrote: > suvayu ali wrote: > > >> *cough* Majority of the world is not latin based language speaking *cough* > > I realize that, but I was not referring to the majority of the world's > population, but to the majority of Fedora users. What makes you thi

Re: [solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-09 Thread Peter Gueckel
suvayu ali wrote: > *cough* Majority of the world is not latin based language speaking *cough* I realize that, but I was not referring to the majority of the world's population, but to the majority of Fedora users. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change s

Re: [solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-08 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Thursday, 8. March 2012. 17.06.15 Peter Gueckel wrote: > Marko Vojinovic wrote: > > If you don't know what it is, most probably you don't need > > it. > > It's odd that is would say "recommended" when the mojority of users would > never need it, but, no matter, I have disabled it again. I'd sa

Re: [solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-08 Thread 夜神 岩男
On 03/09/2012 09:06 AM, Peter Gueckel wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: If you don't know what it is, most probably you don't need it. It's odd that is would say "recommended" when the mojority of users would never need it, but, no matter, I have disabled it again. Most of us in the rest of the

Re: [solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-08 Thread suvayu ali
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 01:06, Peter Gueckel wrote: > Marko Vojinovic wrote: > >> If you don't know what it is, most probably you don't need >> it. > > It's odd that is would say "recommended" when the mojority of users would > never > need it, but, no matter, I have disabled it again. *cough* Ma

[solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-08 Thread Peter Gueckel
Marko Vojinovic wrote: > If you don't know what it is, most probably you don't need > it. It's odd that is would say "recommended" when the mojority of users would never need it, but, no matter, I have disabled it again. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or cha

[solved] Re: to ibus or not to ibus, that is the question

2012-03-08 Thread Peter Gueckel
suvayu ali wrote: > Its very useful to type scripts which are not based on the latin > alphabet OK, thanks. I have disabled it again. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guideli