Kevin Fenzi writes:
> We don't currently have any ARC setup.
Well, I can't promise it will have great effect, although I know from
the design and implementation discussions that Google takes it
seriously, and Microsoft implements it. So it's just a suggestion for
"your copious free time".
>
On 11/1/22 5:30 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We don't currently have any ARC setup.
>
> When / if we can get the list processor upgraded, I think newer versions
> of mailman3 have native ARC support, and we could look at enabling that.
>
I think so, yeah. 100% worth looking at when/if upgraded.
-
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:50:07PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>
> > I can't force the list to do this. Your domain would need to enable
> > DMARC and set reject or quarantine
>
> Pretty sure it's not "his" domain. I believe GMX is a major internet
> provider (and e
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 04:42:14PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:18:43AM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Kevin,
Thanks for your quick response!
[ ... ]
I have already tried this, so I guess let me know when/if you get the
bounce. ;) (ie, I have unsubscribed the user who
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> I can't force the list to do this. Your domain would need to enable
> DMARC and set reject or quarantine
Pretty sure it's not "his" domain. I believe GMX is a major internet
provider (and email provider) in Germany, which already has an
explicit DMARC policy of 'none' on
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 12:18:43AM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> Kevin,
> Thanks for your quick response!
>
> TL;DR:
> if you're suggesting that the
>
> "From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer "
>
> header in my future emails to this Fedora list should be replaced with
> something along the line of this:
>
Kevin,
Thanks for your quick response!
TL;DR:
if you're suggesting that the
"From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer "
header in my future emails to this Fedora list should be replaced with
something along the line of this:
"From: Wolfgang Pfeiffer via
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeif
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 08:57:28PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
...snip...
>
> By now the list management - provided there is one - should know about
> the problem. If they can't fix it I will by sending those DSNs to
> /dev/null - or I just unsubscribe.
>
> Thanks a lot for your time - goes o
Wolfgang Pfeiffer writes:
> Here we are again: because shortly after sending the message at the
> very end of this forwarded message I got the message attached
> below.
>
> One thing that y.antoniowat...@gmail.com (see below)
I think y.antoniowatson is possibly a victim as well, because of
On 10/30/22 3:57 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> no such -owner or similar addresses seem to be available in the
> mail-headers sent to this list.
I believe it's .
-srw
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 04:08:00PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 30, 2022, at 15:57, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:01:55PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
There are addresses specifically for that purpose. It is very
frequently the case that list admins man
On Oct 30, 2022, at 15:57, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:01:55PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> > So yes: this email is explicitly meant to be also read the Fedora list
>> > administrators.
>>
>> There are addresses specifically for that purpose. It is very
>> f
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:01:55PM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
However, with respect to Wolfgang's posts, the official DMARC (RFC
7489) protocol is not involved here since gmx.net publishes a policy
of "none", which means receivers should take no action merely on the
basis of failure of Fr
b2052.eurp189.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To:
References:
<0983ea981dcbc4ab96b17d24342424d4892f5d92.ca...@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Undeliverable: [Resolved] Re: Fwd: [Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists
and Discourse]
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
X-MS-PublicTraffi
More than 24 hours ago I sent the message below to this list without
an error message as a follow-up being sent to me: Looks good, and I'd
guess the problem's solved.
Thanks a lot to everyone who helped fixing it. :)
Wolfgang
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 03:01:52PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Wolfgang Pfeiffer writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:12:21PM +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> >You''ll notice that my messages don't come from my address, but the
> >list server has changed them to:
> >
> > Tim via users
> >
> >And I see the same for some other people.
> >
> >I think this
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:12:21PM +1030, Tim via users wrote:
On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 23:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
2: Does anyone understand what happened according to the message
attached below from postmas...@outlook.com
[ ... ]
You''ll notice that my messages don't come from my
On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 15:40 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> I use gmail for lists.
I'm still using Yahoo for lists. When I first started using mailing
lists, yahoo was the biggest source of spam coming into them, so I
figured they deserved to be the recipient. And they seem better at not
fa
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:43 PM Tim via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Gmail seems to have a problem with mailing lists. Heck knows why, it
> ought to know how they work, by now. The problem being that when you
> post through through the list, *it* is not an authorised sender
Samuel Sieb writes:
This is the problem. The server either doesn't like the SPF policy or the
received message fails the SPF policy. Maybe the mailing list admins will
have to add gmx.net to the list of hidden senders.
I run very stringent SPF checks, and to my knowledge I have no issues
On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 23:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> 2: Does anyone understand what happened according to the message
> attached below from postmas...@outlook.com
I saw the message in question, it came through yesterday. My guess is
that it's not your problem, but Gmail's. I've seen
On 10/27/22 16:01, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:17:31PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
This is the problem. The server either doesn't like the SPF policy or
the received message fails the SPF policy. Maybe the mailing list
admins will have to add gmx.net to the list of hidden
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:17:31PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/27/22 15:11, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Received: from pop.gmx.net [212.227.17.185]
by aw17 with POP3 (fetchmail-6.4.31)
for <[deleted local user name]@localhost> (single-drop); Wed,
26 Oct 2022 20:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Receiv
On 10/27/22 15:11, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Received: from pop.gmx.net [212.227.17.185]
by aw17 with POP3 (fetchmail-6.4.31)
for <[deleted local user name]@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 26
Oct 2022 20:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
([4
53d3334"
X-MS-Exchange-Message-Is-Ndr:
Content-Language: en-US
Message-ID:
<01b97988-1737-4713-91bd-b1f8bf073...@pr3p189mb1017.eurp189.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To:
References:
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
X
> Am 27.10.2022 um 23:38 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer :
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:09:35PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> The error message below, that was sent to me after sending an email to
>> this list (via relay=mail.gmx.net. [212.227.17.190] - the message
>
> wrong: IP should say
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:09:35PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
The error message below, that was sent to me after sending an email to
this list (via relay=mail.gmx.net. [212.227.17.190] - the message
wrong: IP should say [212.227.17.168]
itself can be seen at the very end of the forwarde
according to the message
> attached below from postmas...@outlook.com
>
> Thanks in anticipation
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
> - Forwarded message from postmas...@outlook.com -
>
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:46:59 +
> From: postmas...@outlook.com
> Subject: U
n
Wolfgang
- Forwarded message from postmas...@outlook.com -
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:46:59 +
From: postmas...@outlook.com
Subject: Undeliverable: Re: Mailing lists and Discourse
To: r...@gmx.net
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
y.antoniowat...@gmail.com<mailto:y.a
29 matches
Mail list logo
