> >From what I've heard about wayland it is 100% open GL and
> has abandoned ordinary X. That isn't going to be very useful
> at all for folks who do most of their work talking
> to remote X servers since remote GL stands no chance
> of being anything other than a total slug.
Remote GL does not ne
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:57:14 -0400
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> Wayland (plus) has a decent shot of being a good future
>
> >From what I've heard about wayland it is 100% open GL and
> has abandoned ordinary X. That isn't going to be very usefu
On 04/01/2011 12:57 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> In the meantime, have you tried KDE - curious what your impressions
> are of that ?
Years ago, I knew I'd probably have to decide on either Gnome or KDE, so
I examined both of their websites. Gnome's was full of details about
what they were d
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:57:14 -0400
Genes MailLists wrote:
> Wayland (plus) has a decent shot of being a good future
>From what I've heard about wayland it is 100% open GL and
has abandoned ordinary X. That isn't going to be very useful
at all for folks who do most of their work talking
to remote
On 04/01/2011 03:41 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
ou may not be all that happy with XFCE either, if what you really want is
> GNOME-2. I don't know where to go after fc14, what I want is GNOME-2, and
> that
> isn't happening, Fedora developers drank the kool-aid and not only gave up
> the
> far more
