> On 03/30/2011 10:58 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>>> On 03/25/2011 07:12 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>>
Should the 389ds be able to understand "usercertificate;binary", and
is
this a misconfiguration on my part in the directory server, or is that
not
something I should be expec
On 03/30/2011 10:58 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>> On 03/25/2011 07:12 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>
>>> Should the 389ds be able to understand "usercertificate;binary", and is
>>> this a misconfiguration on my part in the directory server, or is that
>>> not
>>> something I should be expecting the dire
> On 03/25/2011 07:12 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>> Should the 389ds be able to understand "usercertificate;binary", and is
>> this a misconfiguration on my part in the directory server, or is that
>> not
>> something I should be expecting the directory to understand?
> the ;binary option was define
We have a java application that is attempting to pull the userCertificate
attribute from our 389ds ldap server. Looking at the ldap logs, I see its
request, and it looks like it should be working, except for one oddity, it
is asking for the attribute "usercertificate;binary". By attaching
eclipse