Re: [389-users] replica/rdn problems with 1.2.6 rc6

2010-08-06 Thread Rich Megginson
Jonathan Boulle wrote: > On 08/05/2010 07:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> This looks ok. Can you provide the exact steps you used so I can try to >> reproduce this? >> > Certainly. > > 1) clean OS install (CentOS 5.4 x86_64 here), latest 389 packages (yum > --enablerepo epel-testing)

Re: [389-users] replica/rdn problems with 1.2.6 rc6

2010-08-06 Thread Jonathan Boulle
discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. Subject: Re: [389-users] replica/rdn problems with 1.2.6 rc6 Jonathan Boulle wrote: > On 08/05/2010 07:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> This looks ok. Can you provide the exact steps you used so I can try to >&

Re: [389-users] replica/rdn problems with 1.2.6 rc6

2010-08-06 Thread Rich Megginson
Jonathan Boulle wrote: > On 08/05/2010 07:03 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > >> This looks ok. Can you provide the exact steps you used so I can try to >> reproduce this? >> > Certainly. > > 1) clean OS install (CentOS 5.4 x86_64 here), latest 389 packages (yum > --enablerepo epel-testing)

Re: [389-users] replica/rdn problems with 1.2.6 rc6

2010-08-05 Thread Rich Megginson
Jonathan Boulle wrote: > > When trying to enable consumer replication on a database/root suffix, > we get an “operations error” (in the GUI or command line with > ldapmodify) and the following in the log: > > [05/Aug/2010:17:35:20 +0100] entryrdn-index - _entryrdn_insert_key: > Suffix "dc=exampl