Re: [389-users] With LDAP server stopped, local authentication fails...

2010-02-05 Thread Sean Carolan
> The problem is probably in pam. Lot s of internet docs have incorrect > info advice and say. > account    required     pam_nologin.so > account   sufficient pam_ldap.so > > When you do that you get the situation you have now. In some phases of > login sufficient becomes required. > > Try this: B

Re: [389-users] With LDAP server stopped, local authentication fails...

2010-02-03 Thread Edward Capriolo
Also much documentation on the internet is plain wrong and untested. For example people will say this is ok: #%PAM-1.0 auth sufficient pam_ldap.so auth include system-auth accountrequired pam_nologin.so accountsufficient pam_ldap.so accountinclude system-auth

[389-users] With LDAP server stopped, local authentication fails...

2010-02-03 Thread Sean Carolan
My LDAP server is working well, but at this point we're not ready to make the jump over to LDAP-only authentication. I would like to keep regular shadow passwords working for a while. I have run authconfig-tui on one of the CentOS clients and made sure "Use MD5 passwords", "Use Shadow Passwords",