On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Please file bugs/RFEs at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=389
Ok will do, thanks.
--
Fabio Erculiani
http://www.sabayon.org
http://www.gentoo.org
--
389 users mailing list
389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
At last, I've been able to figure out where the pipe() problem stands.
389-admin is improperly using the cgi module. When using a
multithreaded MPM (worker), mod_cgid had to be used. It happens that
389-admin needs apache (with worker MPM) and mod_cgi (and not
mod_cgid).
mod_cgid fork() itself from
Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> Roberto Polli wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> our company decided to sponsor a Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org.
>>>
>>> It seems that there are some issues in admin-server, which have been
>>> deeply invest
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Roberto Polli wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> our company decided to sponsor a Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org.
>>
>> It seems that there are some issues in admin-server, which have been
>> deeply investigated by the Sabayon maintainer.
>>
>> T
Roberto Polli wrote:
> Hi all,
> our company decided to sponsor a Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org.
>
> It seems that there are some issues in admin-server, which have been deeply
> investigated by the Sabayon maintainer.
>
> Those issues could be related to the latest versions of the librari
Hi all,
our company decided to sponsor a Sabayon/Gentoo distribution of 389org.
It seems that there are some issues in admin-server, which have been deeply
investigated by the Sabayon maintainer.
Those issues could be related to the latest versions of the libraries used in
Gentoo; so the questi
