Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.9.6 Testing

2011-08-24 Thread Anthony Messina
On 08/24/2011 02:21 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Thanks. It seems to have something to do with the number and type of > acis being used. > > I don't have all of the schema for these, but this revealed another bug > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733103 - but I don't think > you are

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.9.6 Testing

2011-08-24 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/23/2011 04:26 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: > On 08/23/2011 09:26 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: >> Can you provide the exact aci you used below? >>> dc=messinet,dc=com (anonymous perms removed, all other defaults intact) >>> | >>> +-ou=People (allowed dns=localhost,messinet.com,*.messinet.com) >>> |

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.9.6 Testing

2011-08-22 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/22/2011 02:51 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: > On 08/16/2011 04:40 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: >> On 08/16/2011 03:33 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: >>> On 08/16/2011 03:25 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > I havent filed a bug yet as I am working on a virtual environment to > test, which I'm sure yo

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.9.6 Testing

2011-08-16 Thread Rich Megginson
On 08/16/2011 03:33 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: > On 08/16/2011 03:25 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: >>> I havent filed a bug yet as I am working on a virtual environment to >>> test, which I'm sure you'll want me to, in order to be able to replicate >>> the issue ;) >> Indeed, yes, please let us know as

Re: [389-users] Announcing 389 Directory Server version 1.2.9.6 Testing

2011-08-16 Thread Anthony Messina
On 08/16/2011 03:25 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: >> I havent filed a bug yet as I am working on a virtual environment to >> test, which I'm sure you'll want me to, in order to be able to replicate >> the issue ;) > Indeed, yes, please let us know asap. Sure. If you know the settings I need to enable