system_u:object_r:usr_t:s03 Jan 1 1970
lang_ext
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:23 AM stan via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:22:11 +0200
> arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> >
I run Fedora atomic 29. I made a mistake by removing one very important
SELinux module: su.
I can no more su (I can sudo), which is very annoying. To get back the
module, I need to reinstall the selinux-policy-targeted package.
--
% sudo setenforce 0
% sud
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:10 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 8/28/19 8:05 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > Turning it on allows user gabx to ssh. So it is a first good news. I am
> left now with the inability to load module.
>
> FWIW, when I run into selinux issue I post on the s
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 1:19 PM Petr Lautrbach
wrote:
> > Until a few days ago, my Fedora 29 Atomic host was working perfectly with
> > SELinux enforced. The server is only a few week old with nothing fancy
> yet
> > set or installed.
> >
> > I changed recently my user (gabx) context from the def
Until a few days ago, my Fedora 29 Atomic host was working perfectly with
SELinux enforced. The server is only a few week old with nothing fancy yet
set or installed.
I changed recently my user (gabx) context from the default unconfined to
systemand ran restorecon. This change may be the root of
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:36 PM Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 1/24/19 5:49 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> I am following this wiki[0] to run R Studio on my box. Below are the
> commands I run
>
> --
> # podman run -d -p 8787:8787 -e PASSWORD=XXX --name rstud
I am following this wiki[0] to run R Studio on my box. Below are the
commands I run
--
# podman run -d -p 8787:8787 -e PASSWORD=XXX --name rstudio rocker/tidyverse
..
Storing signatures
a72fac512b891c21f0654334a2032b0d67b87720cb986a092237ab272d245f8d
---
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 3:18 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 10:54:18 PM EST ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Any sign of Fedora on a tablet?
>
Not really a tablet, but I run Fedora 29 silverblue on a Lenovo Yoga and
the touchscreen is working very
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 1:48 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I am following this wiki[0] to run R Studio on my box. Below are the
> commands I run
>
> --
> # podman run -d -p 8787:8787 -e PASSWORD=XXX --name rstudio
> rocker/tidyverse
> ..
I am following this wiki[0] to run R Studio on my box. Below are the
commands I run
--
# podman run -d -p 8787:8787 -e PASSWORD=XXX --name rstudio rocker/tidyverse
..
Storing signatures
a72fac512b891c21f0654334a2032b0d67b87720cb986a092237ab272d245f8d
---
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:42 AM Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:48:58 +0000, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > At the begining of my build, I need:
> > - mkdir src/github.com/mattermost
> > -unzip the source in src/github.com/mattermost/plateform-master
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:57 PM James Hogarth
wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2017 3:49 pm, "arnaud gaboury" wrote:
>
> Here is my working directory at the beginning of build, right after I
> downloaded the source with spectool. The root directory of the .zip file
Here is my working directory at the beginning of build, right after I
downloaded the source with spectool. The root directory of the .zip file is
called "platform-master".
---
[makerpm@thetradinghall rpmbuild]$ ls -al
-rw-rw-r-- 1 makerpm makerpm 31120791 Jan 15 11:52 master.zip
-r
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 12:22 AM Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:57:42 +0000, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > %prep
> > %autosetup -n platform-master
> >
> > # many golang binaries are "vendoring" (bundling) sources, so remove
> them.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 12:22 AM Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:57:42 +0000, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > %prep
> > %autosetup -n platform-master
> >
> > # many golang binaries are "vendoring" (bundling) sources, so remove
> them.
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 1:56 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I wrote a spec file to build a .rpm for an application working only on 64
> bits machines. The package builds fine and is in this form:
> myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm
>
> Now, $ fedpkg --dist f25 lint complains:
> E: no-b
I wrote a spec file to build a .rpm for an application working only on 64
bits machines. The package builds fine and is in this form:
myapp-version.fc25.x86_64.rpm
Now, $ fedpkg --dist f25 lint complains:
E: no-binary
Googling I found the package should be of the noarch architecture. Adding
Build
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:53 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:57 PM arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:25:07 +, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:57 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM Michael Schwendt
> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:25:07 +0000, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-hardlink
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
>
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 5:17 PM Michael Schwendt
wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:25:07 +0000, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-hardlink
> > + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
> > error: Bad file:
> > /home/makerpm/build_package/matte
I am writing a spec file. Everything build fine until the very last. Make
throw an error and I don't understand why.
Part of the spec file:
cd %{_builddir}
install -Dm755 bin/platform %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/bin/platform
install -Dm755 mattermost.sh %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM Honza Silhan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:51 AM, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, 1:45 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >>
> >> On December 12, 2016
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, 1:45 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On December 12, 2016 2:06:37 AM PST, arnaud gaboury <
> arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >--
> > Upgrading :
> >httpd-2.4.23-5.fc24.x86_64
> >1/4
> >Error unpacking rpm p
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016, 12:32 AM Tony Nelson
wrote:
> On 16-12-13 16:22:08, Honza Silhan wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:26 PM, arnaud gaboury
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:06 AM arnaud gaboury
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:06 AM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I want to upgrade from 24 to 25. Following this[0], I first run:
> # dnf upgrade --refresh
>
> I am left with an issue for one package:
>
> --
> Upgrading :
> httpd-2.4.23-5.f
I want to upgrade from 24 to 25. Following this[0], I first run:
# dnf upgrade --refresh
I am left with an issue for one package:
--
Upgrading :
httpd-2.4.23-5.fc24.x86_64
1/4
Error unpacking rpm package httpd-2.4.23-5.fc24.x86_64
Error unpacking rpm package httpd-
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 3:16 PM Max Pyziur wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
> > I am upgrading my box to F25 from F24.
> >
> > First I ran # dnf upgrade --refresh , but some packages did not upgarde.
> All these packages are nodejs ones.
> &
I am upgrading my box to F25 from F24.
First I ran # dnf upgrade --refresh , but some packages did not upgarde.
All these packages are nodejs ones.
Below is the error I get when trying to upgrade one package, nodejs:
# dnf upgrade nodejs
.
Running transaction check
Tra
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 8:56 AM Matthias Runge
wrote:
> On 08/11/16 15:59, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> > I am writing a .spec file for an app built with go[0].
> > I first made a build following the official doc, then write a .spec file
> > and built with it .rpm. Everything
I am writing a .spec file for an app built with go[0].
I first made a build following the official doc, then write a .spec file
and built with it .rpm. Everything is OK but I have some doubts when I look
at some other .spec files for application writen in GO, or create a spec
file for my app using
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 2:15 PM Jon Ingason wrote:
> Den 2016-11-05 kl. 13:23, skrev arnaud gaboury:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM arnaud gaboury > <mailto:arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I am writing a .spec file to bui
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 1:10 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I am writing a .spec file to build an app written in GO.
>
> $ fedpkg --dist f24 local
> error: Failed build dependencies:
> compiler(go-compiler) is needed by
> mattermost-3.4-0.1.gitf79f607.fc24.x86_64
>
> Coul
I am writing a .spec file to build an app written in GO.
$ fedpkg --dist f24 local
error: Failed build dependencies:
compiler(go-compiler) is needed by
mattermost-3.4-0.1.gitf79f607.fc24.x86_64
Could not execute local: Non zero exit
# dnf install go-compiler
Last metadata expiration check: 0
I am writing a .spec file for an app writen in GO. I am a litle confused
how to indicate revision and release, following this wiki[0].
The app is in a git repo. When cloning and cd the dir app, I run this
command:
$ git describe --long | sed 's/^v//;s/\([^-]*-g\)/r\1/;s/-/.
This gives me for examp
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:19 AM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I am writing a spec file to build an app.
> The build failed with this error:
>
> *** ERROR: No build ID note found in
> /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mattermost-3.4-1.fc24.x86_64/usr/share/webapps/mattermost/bin/platform
I am writing a spec file to build an app.
The build failed with this error:
*** ERROR: No build ID note found in
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mattermost-3.4-1.fc24.x86_64/usr/share/webapps/mattermost/bin/platform
Googling it, I found a few "tricks" which I tried but don't work:
- Adding "LDFL
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:47 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 6:42 AM, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>
> Below is part of my .spec file:
> --
>
> %install
> install -Dm644 mattermost.service
> %{buildr
Below is part of my .spec file:
--
%install
install -Dm644 mattermost.service
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/systemd/system/mattermost.service
install -Dm644 mattermost-user.conf
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/sysusers.d/mattermost.conf
%files
%{_libdir}/systemd/system
I am writing a .spec file to build my own .rpm.
Here it is, non completed:
---
Name: mattermost
Version: 3.4
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Mattermost is an open source, self-hosted Slack-alternative
URL: http://www.mattermost.org
Source0: https://github.co
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:41 PM Ahmad Samir
wrote:
> On 27 October 2016 at 14:28, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:11 PM arnaud gaboury >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > NEW EDIT: the autosetup command as described abov
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:11 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:47 PM arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>
> Here is part of my spec file:
>
> ---
> Name: mattermost
> Version: 3.4.0
> Release: 1%{?dist}
> Summary
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:47 PM arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> Here is part of my spec file:
>
> ---
> Name: mattermost
> Version: 3.4.0
> Release: 1%{?dist}
> Summary: Mattermost is an open source, self-hosted Slack-al
Here is part of my spec file:
---
Name: mattermost
Version: 3.4.0
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Mattermost is an open source, self-hosted Slack-alternative
URL: http://www.mattermost.org
Source0:
https://releases.mattermost.com/%{version}/mattermost-%{vers
My upgrade from Fedora 23 to 24 left me with a broken postgresql.
# /usr/libexec/postgresql-ctl start -D /db/pgsql/data -s -w -t 270
FATAL: 22023: database files are incompatible with server
DETAIL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 9.4,
which is not compatible with this
I am left with a broken postgresql since my upgrade to Fedora 24.
Starting the service retruns this error:
# /usr/libexec/postgresql-ctl start -D /db/pgsql/data -s -w -t 270
FATAL: 22023: database files are incompatible with server
DETAIL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL versio
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:10 PM, stan wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:24:35 +0200
> arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>
> > I was thinking of installing via rpm the opensuse rpm package with a
> > different location, then build dovecot using this glibc. But the
>
> If it is
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 3:07 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> Fedora 23
>
> I built an email server with postfix+dovecot+postgresql.
>
> When it comes to retrieve the user password, I have this error from
> dovecot:
>
> Unknown scheme BLF-CRYPT
>
> In fact, my password
Fedora 23
I built an email server with postfix+dovecot+postgresql.
When it comes to retrieve the user password, I have this error from dovecot:
Unknown scheme BLF-CRYPT
In fact, my passwords are encrypted this way in my DB. After some readings,
it seems not all Linux distro have glibc built wi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I just did a "dnf update" and now dovecot won't start at boot.
No issue here with the updated dovecot. I guess it has nothing to do
with the update.
>
> I get errors like:
>
> Feb 11 07:23:41 tomh systemd[1]: dovecot.service: Main process exit
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 02/09/16 21:14, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> Now trying to an external user:
>>
>> % telnet mail.thetradinghall.com 587
>>
>> ..
>> email
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 6:32 AM, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 09 February 2016, arnaud gaboury sent:
>
>> When looking at my DNS provider (Hurricane Electric), I effectively
>> have no PTR record. I must set one but honestly, I am far from
>> understanding everythi
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Tom Rivers wrote:
> On 2/9/2016 8:57 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, looking at my DNS provider home page, I have an entry to add
>> PTR. Furthermore, from HE FAQ[0]:
>>
>> > whatever means you wish, assuming you w
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Tom Rivers wrote:
> On 2/9/2016 8:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> When looking at my DNS provider (Hurricane Electric), I effectively
>> have no PTR record. I must set one but honestly, I am far from
>> understanding everything about
I am setting up a mail server with Postfix and bump my head about an
issue since a few days.
Issue:
Testing with Telnet:
% telnet mail.thetradinghall.com 587
Trying MyPublicIp...
Connected to mail.thetradinghall.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 poppy.thetrad
I am running Fedora 23 server. Among other services, I want to deploy
a mail server with postfix.
1- I registered on my DNS provider a A and MX records:
mail.thetradinghall.com.86400INA212.147.52.214
thetradinghall.com.8
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:14 PM, jd1008 wrote:
>
>
> On 01/19/2016 11:32 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> I usually manage to build easily one package.
>> I changed the way I build my packages using a makerpm user, as it is
>> the best way to avoid polluted envir
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:32 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I usually manage to build easily one package.
> I changed the way I build my packages using a makerpm user, as it is
> the best way to avoid polluted environment variables.
>
> The weird thins is I can't download the
I usually manage to build easily one package.
I changed the way I build my packages using a makerpm user, as it is
the best way to avoid polluted environment variables.
The weird thins is I can't download the source anymore, and can't see why.
From my spec file:
Name: R-intel
Version
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:13 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 15 January 2016 at 14:01, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:48 PM, arnaud gaboury
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>>> wrote:
>>>>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:48 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 11:42 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>> I need to unset one of my environment variable to successfully build
>>>
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 11:42 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I need to unset one of my environment variable to successfully build
>> a
>> rpm package.
>>
>> I added this in my .spe
I need to unset one of my environment variable to successfully build a
rpm package.
I added this in my .spec file, but apparently it doesn't work:
---
if [ -n $R_PROFILE_USER ];then
unset R_PROFILE_USER
fi
---
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:13 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:37:42 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>>> >> > error: unpacking of archive failed on file /sys: cpio: chmod
>>>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 20:37:42 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> >> > error: unpacking of archive failed on file /sys: cpio: chmod
>> >> > error: filesystem-3.2-35.fc23.x86_64: install failed
>>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:03:49 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> > # rpm -Uvh
>> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/filesystem/3.2/35.fc23/x86_64/filesystem-3.2-35.fc23.x86_64.rpm
>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:03 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:50 PM, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Michael Schwendt
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:10:43 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:50 PM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:10:43 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>>> Fedora 23
>>>
>>> It has been since a few eeeks now upgrading
>>&
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:10:43 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> Fedora 23
>>
>> It has been since a few eeeks now upgrading
>> filesystem-3.2-32.fc23.x86_64 to filesystem-3.2-35.fc23.x86_64 fails.
>>
Fedora 23
It has been since a few eeeks now upgrading
filesystem-3.2-32.fc23.x86_64 to filesystem-3.2-35.fc23.x86_64 fails.
The only thing I can find in log files is this:
Dec 14 16:00:02 ERROR Error unpacking rpm package filesystem-3.2-35.fc23.x86_64
Until now my system is working well, but I
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:26 AM, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>
>> I have some rpm packages I have built myself. I need to create a local
>> repo in order to reference these packages and solve dependency issues.
>>
>
I have some rpm packages I have built myself. I need to create a local
repo in order to reference these packages and solve dependency issues.
What I did:
- put all my .rpm in one folder
- # createrepo /my/path/to/rpm
The last command create and populate a subdir repodata
then:
# dnf config-manag
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015, 10:13 PM Ranjan Maitra
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 17:11:19 +0100 arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Ranjan Maitra
> wrote:
> > Question: why do you need R-intel-core? My RStudio works fine without
it.
>
> Long debate, but R built wi
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 12/07/2015 09:20 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, arnaud gaboury
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:16 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>>> I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
>>> I have
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
>> I have this error:
>>
>> # dnf install MyPackage.rpm
>> Error: pa
gt; 2015.
> No package R-intel-core available.
> Error: Unable to find a match.
>Normal, I made this package and gave it the name R-intel to make a difference
>with regular R
>
> Ranjan
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:03 +0100 arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>
>>
I wrote and build successfuly a rpm package. When it comes to install,
I have this error:
# dnf install MyPackage.rpm
Error: package rstudio-server-0.99.800-1.fc23.x86_64 requires
libR.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
The cited library is indeed already installed:
% ldconf
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 11:06:18 +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>
>> >> doubt is how deep I shall go in lisiting
>> >> direcrories/subdirectories/files.
>
>> >> What I would do is this:
>> >&g
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:22 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:02 AM, arnaud gaboury
> wrote:
>> I am not sure how I shall lsit my files under the %files section. My
>> doubt is how deep I shall go in lisiting
>> direcrories/subdirectories/files.
&g
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:02 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> I am not sure how I shall lsit my files under the %files section. My
> doubt is how deep I shall go in lisiting
> direcrories/subdirectories/files.
>
> Below is part of the content
I am not sure how I shall lsit my files under the %files section. My
doubt is how deep I shall go in lisiting
direcrories/subdirectories/files.
Below is part of the content of my buildroot
% ls usr/lib64/rstudio-server
bin/ resource
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:28 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> To build successfully a rpm package from my .spec file I need alias a command.
> The alias command is not taken into account in the .spec file. I can
> of course run it in my shell before the build, but I would like to
> include
To build successfully a rpm package from my .spec file I need alias a command.
The alias command is not taken into account in the .spec file. I can
of course run it in my shell before the build, but I would like to
include the process in .spec file.
The link[1] is confusing. Something like:
pm ali
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 5:42 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> here is the begining of my spec file:
>
> -
> Name: rstudio-server
> Version: 0.99.800
> Release: 1%{?dist}
> Summary: Rstudio Server lets you access Rstudi
here is the begining of my spec file:
-
Name: rstudio-server
Version: 0.99.800
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Rstudio Server lets you access Rstudio from anywhere using a
web browser
URL: http://www.rstudio.com
Source0: github.com/rstudi
For those of us who are wondering if this can be tricky, I just want
to testify you just have to follow Fedora instruction[1] and restart
the machine. No issues at all and Fedora will be upgraded to 23.
You need to wait a little bit (~ 5-10 mn) after you run
# dnf system-upgrade reboot
for the sys
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> On 12. 10. 2015 at 12:04:00, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> I built my own .rpm's for a meta package. These packages are only a
>> modification of an existing Fedora package. Before I installed my own
>> packages, I
I built my own .rpm's for a meta package. These packages are only a
modification of an existing Fedora package. Before I installed my own
packages, I first removed the original version from Fedora.
Thus now $ dnf list installed return correctly:
Software version-MyBuild.fc22.1
When doing a sy
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:52 PM, stan wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 07:42:02 -0700
> stan wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:11:12 +0200
>> arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> Ha! I just went to the group to find the email address, and I saw
>> your post there. I g
I wrote a .spec file to build a meta pacakge with many shared librairies
installed by Intel parallel studio 2016. The spec file is attached.
There is no Fedora package for Intel, but the installation script
install many .rpm packages, and all are correctly listed when running
$ dnf list | grep int
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 04:32 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> I totally agree. At worth it can leave your system with unneeded packages.
>
>
> Your original request was ambiguous. "rpm -e --nodeps" removes a pa
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 06:38 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> On 30 September 2015 at 11:24, arnaud gaboury
>> wrote:
>>> Is there any equivalent dnf command for :
>>>
>>> # rpm --nodeps -e MyPackage
>>>
Is there any equivalent dnf command for :
# rpm --nodeps -e MyPackage
Thank you
--
google.com/+arnaudgabourygabx
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: ht
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 09/07/15 16:26, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>> Was in my current directory! Any way to tell in dnf.conf a specific
>> path for cache ?
>
> [egreshko@meimei ~]$ dnf download --help-cmd
> usage: dnf download [--help-cm
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:23 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> % dnf download --source R
> enabling fedora-source repository
> enabling updates-source repository
> Last metadata expiration check performed 0:13:28 ago on Mon Sep 7
> 10:06:57 2015.
> [SKIPPED] R-3.2.1-2.fc22.src.rpm:
% dnf download --source R
enabling fedora-source repository
enabling updates-source repository
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:13:28 ago on Mon Sep 7
10:06:57 2015.
[SKIPPED] R-3.2.1-2.fc22.src.rpm: Already downloaded
The downloaded packages were saved in cache till the next successful
Fedora 22
For some practical reasons, I would like to gather all my rpm build
somewhere else than ~/rpmbuild.
I can't find any option/conf file to change this default behavior.
Even when cd somewhere else, running the command will always create
~/rpmbuild.
I can of course create a symlink, but I
I tried one year ago to setup a multi seat on my box. By that time,
the setup was impossible as:
- I didn't use lightdm to log sessions
- I didn't have any two monitor hub.
- my distro was not Fedora and the systemd seat configuration was very tricky.
I am back now to this setup with everything ne
When connecting to cockpit, from Firefox or chromium, I get this error
when looking at the JS console:
TypeError: l.GetUnitFileState is not a function1 shell.js:38:3271
TypeError: c.Subscribe is not a function1 bundle.js:2:8289
I can still browse and see pages.
Any idea why and how to fix it ?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015, 11:38 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
On Tue, 28.04.15 09:31, arnaud gaboury (arnaud.gabo...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I started running Fedora server on a systemd-nspawn container.
>
> I am wondering what is the best practice when an issue occurs:
> - send to Fe
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
