Hi,
Running Fedora41 with all RPM updates to date, and with KDE on X11.
A recent update to libreoffice has done two things:
1. On exporting a "*.odt" file using the toolbar "Export to PDF" button,
libreoffice will often crash. Not first time after you load the
document, but perhaps after open
On 29/07/2024 06:13, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/28/24 10:09 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
We are using software raided partitions, including the root partition
on some of our server systems.
We normally have multiple root partitions to keep the previous Fedora
version available so we can reboot into
We are using software raided partitions, including the root partition on
some of our server systems.
We normally have multiple root partitions to keep the previous Fedora
version available so we can reboot into an older version.
We have an issue in that the kernels appear to require the comma
/etc/nsswitch.conf.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:03 AM Terry Barnaby wrote:
A strange one this. I was just updating a Fedora35 server to
Fedora37,
using a full reinstall and then copying configuration files from
the old
system.
The system failed to boot with lo
A strange one this. I was just updating a Fedora35 server to Fedora37,
using a full reinstall and then copying configuration files from the old
system.
The system failed to boot with lots of strange issues with systemd. It
started with console messages like:
[ TIME ] Timeout waiting for devi
On 11/12/2022 10:16, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I've just updated a test machine from Fedora35 to Fedora37, most is
working but users logged in using NIS authentication no longer have
access to audio.
The system is using the KDE/Plasma desktop and the sddm login manager
all using X11.
It
I've just updated a test machine from Fedora35 to Fedora37, most is
working but users logged in using NIS authentication no longer have
access to audio.
The system is using the KDE/Plasma desktop and the sddm login manager
all using X11.
It looks like /run/user/ does not exist and XDG_RUNTIM
Note with NVME drives, well any NAND FLASH, you have to know what
technology is in use when writing data to the drive.
In particular we have noticed that some of the latest, large storage
devices, use TLC (three bits per cell) based technology. Writing to TLC
cells is relatively slow.
So most NV
Since some Fedora33 update in the last couple of weeks the problem has
gone away. I haven't changed anything as far as I am aware.
One change is that the kernel moved from 5.13.x to 5.14.x ...
Terry
On 21/10/2021 23:36, Reon Beon via users wrote:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2081/
We
Hi Roger,
Thanks for looking.
I will try NFS v3 with my latency tests running. I did try NFS v3 before
and I "think" there were still desktop lockups but for a much shorter
time. But this is just a feeling.
Current kernel on both systems is: 5.13.19-100.fc33.x86_64.
If I find the time, I will
sar -n EDEV reports all 0's all around then. There are somerxdrop/s of 0.02 occasionally on eno1 through the day (about 20 of these
with minute based sampling). Today ifconfig lists 39 dropped RX packets
out of 2357593. Not sure why there are some dropped packets. "ethtool -S
eno1" doesn't seem
and iostats:
04/10/21 10:51:14
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
2.09 0.00 1.56 0.02 0.00 96.33
Device r/s rkB/s rrqm/s %rrqm r_await rareq-sz w/s
wkB/s wrqm/s %wrqm w_await wareq-sz d/s dkB/s drqm/s
%drqm d
My disklatencytest showed a longish (14 secs) NFS file system
directoty/stat lookup again today on a desktop:
2021-10-04T05:26:19 0.069486 0.069486 0.000570 /home/...
2021-10-04T05:28:19 0.269743 0.538000 0.001019 /home/...
2021-10-04T09:48:00 1.492158 0.003314
On 04/10/2021 00:51, Roger Heflin wrote:
With 10 minute samples anything that happened gets averaged enough
that even the worst event is almost impossible to see.
Sar will report the same as date ie local time. And a 12:51 event
would be in the 13:00 sample (started at about 12:50 and ended a
45 second event happened at: 2021-10-02T11:51:02 UTC. Not sure what sar
time is based on (maybe local time BST rather than UTC so would be
2021-10-02T12:51:02 BST.
Continuing info ...
sar -n NFSD on the server
11:00:01 24.16 0.00 24.16 0.00 24.16 0.00
0.00
45 second event happened at: 2021-10-02T11:51:02 UTC. Not sure what sar
time is based on (maybe local time BST rather than UTC so would be
2021-10-02T12:51:02 BST.
"sar -d" on the server:
11:50:02 dev8-0 4.67 0.01 46.62 0.00 9.99
0.12 14.03 5.75
11:50:0
I am getting more sure this is an NFS/networking issue rather than an
issue with disks in the server.
I created a small test program that given a directory finds a random
file in a random directory three levels below, opens it and reads up to
a block (512 Bytes) of data from it and times how l
On 01/10/2021 19:05, Roger Heflin wrote:
it will show latency. await is average iotime in ms, and %util is
calced based in await and iops/sec. So long as your turn sar down to
1 minute samples it should tell you which of the 2 disks had higher
await/util%.With a 10 minute sample the 40sec p
On 01/10/2021 13:31, D. Hugh Redelmeier wrote:
Trivial thoughts from reading this thread. Please don't take the
triviality as an insult.
Perhaps the best way to determine if the problem is from a software update
is to downgrade likely packages. In the case of the kernel, you can just
boot an o
On 30/09/2021 19:27, Roger Heflin wrote:
Raid0, so there is no redundancy on the data?
And what kind of underlying hard disks? The desktop drives will try
for a long time (ie a minute or more) to read any bad blocks. Those
disks will not report an error unless it gets to the default os
timeou
On 30/09/2021 11:42, Roger Heflin wrote:
On mine when I first access the NFS volume it takes 5-10 seconds for
the disks to spin up. Mine will spin down later in the day if little
or nothing is going on and I will get another delay.
I have also seen delays if a disk gets bad blocks and correct
On 30/09/2021 11:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 30/09/2021 16:35, Terry Barnaby wrote:
This is a very lightly loaded system with just 3 users ATM and very
little going on across the network (just editing code files etc). The
problem occurred again yesterday. For about 10 minutes my KDE desktop
Thanks for the feedback everyone.
This is a very lightly loaded system with just 3 users ATM and very
little going on across the network (just editing code files etc). The
problem occurred again yesterday. For about 10 minutes my KDE desktop
locked up in 20 second bursts and then the problem w
On 25/09/2021 09:00, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 25/09/2021 14:07, Terry Barnaby wrote:
A few questions.
1. Are you saying your NFS server HW is the same for the past 25
years. Couldn't have been all Fedora, right?
No ( :) ) was using previous Linux and Unix systems before then.
Certain
On 25/09/2021 06:42, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 25/09/2021 13:04, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hi,
I use NFS mount (defaults so V4) /home directories with a simple
server over Gigabit Ethernet all running Fedora33. This has been
working fine for 25+ years through various Fedora versions. However
in the
Hi,
I use NFS mount (defaults so V4) /home directories with a simple server
over Gigabit Ethernet all running Fedora33. This has been working fine
for 25+ years through various Fedora versions. However in the last month
or so all of the client computers are getting KDE GUI lockups every few
h
I have an AM335x based IOT system where the CPU can initially boot over
its USB interface using RDNIS and TCPIP/DHCP/TFTP. I need to run a DHCP
server on a Fedora33 host to support the DHCP requests from this CPU. In
this scenario the CPU brings its USB RDNIS interface up and down about 3
times
On 09/04/2020 12:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-09 17:57, Terry Barnaby wrote:
The script already has date/time and the log shows (The Wed 8th entries entry
having the PID):
Bbackup / /usr/beam /home /src /srcOld /dist /opt /scratch /data/svn /data/www
/data/vwt /data/www /data1/kvm /data
On 09/04/2020 07:00, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 07 Apr 2020 07:07:36 +0100 Terry Barnaby wrote:
# Min Hour Day Month WeekDay
# Perform incremental backup to every work day
01 23 * * 1 root /src/bbackup/bbackup-beam
01 23 * * 2 root /src/bbackup/bbackup-beam
01 23 * * 3 root
On 08/04/2020 23:11, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 08Apr2020 14:54, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Note this has happened a few times this year, (approx 1 in 64 x) so
not related to DST changes anyway. Might be due to chrony clock
resyncs I suppose but I think something stranger is going on here or
On 08/04/2020 14:37, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 20:28 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
I don't know how it works where you live, but in the UK the autumn
switch occurs at 2am, which reverts back to being 1am. Thus a time such
as 1:30am occurs twice, and events programmed for that t
On 07/04/2020 13:06, Iosif Fettich wrote:
Hi Terry,
Yes, there is nothing unusual in /var/log/cron:
Apr 6 22:01:01 beam CROND[651585]: (root) CMD (run-parts
/etc/cron.hourly)
[...]
/var/log/messages
Feb 24 23:00:03 beam dhcpd[1743]: DHCPREQUEST for 192.168.201.214
from 00:25:b3:e6:a9:18
On 07/04/2020 09:03, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/6/20 11:07 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
This system has been in use for 10 years or more on various Fedora
versions. However about 18 months ago I have seen a problem where
cron will start two backups with identical start times occasionally.
I have
On 07/04/2020 09:25, Iosif Fettich wrote:
Hi,
On 2020-04-07 14:07, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have a simple backup system that starts off a backup once per
night during the weekdays. There is a crontab file in /etc/cron.d
with the following entries
On 07/04/2020 08:21, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-07 14:07, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have a simple backup system that starts off a backup once per night during
the weekdays. There is a crontab file in /etc/cron.d with the following entries
I have a simple backup system that starts off a backup once per night
during the weekdays. There is a crontab file in /etc/cron.d with the
following entries:
# Beam Bbackup cron setup Backup to ...
##
On 17/12/2019 17:21, Richard Shaw wrote:
Since I did a *LITTLE* CFD in college I decided to take a look and as
I expected OpenFOAM will likely not be easy to package...
1. It's designed to install to $HOME or /opt (but I believe that can
be modified).
2. It uses a custom build system (wmake) a
On 12/12/2019 12:06, ja wrote:
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 10:01 +, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 12/12/2019 06:33, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just started to try out Fedora31 on some of our systems.
I am using a bit of an unusual, manual install method copying an image
of the rootfs to the disk and
On 12/12/2019 06:33, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I have just started to try out Fedora31 on some of our systems.
I am using a bit of an unusual, manual install method copying an image
of the rootfs to the disk and configuring this, (this may be related
to my issue, but I have been using the same
I have just started to try out Fedora31 on some of our systems.
I am using a bit of an unusual, manual install method copying an image
of the rootfs to the disk and configuring this, (this may be related to
my issue, but I have been using the same system for 6 years or more).
The particular ha
On 09/01/2019 08:19, John Harris wrote:
On Wednesday, January 9, 2019 3:14:25 AM EST Terry Barnaby wrote:
I know you asked for Fedora, but a standard, low cost router, running
OpenWRT, https://openwrt.org/, would likely be better for the tasks you
mention. OpenWRT is a minimal Linux system with
I know you asked for Fedora, but a standard, low cost router, running
OpenWRT, https://openwrt.org/, would likely be better for the tasks you
mention. OpenWRT is a minimal Linux system with the ability to install
extra packages. It has a simple to use WEB admin system and can do all
the things
You could try the program memtester "dnf install memtester" "memtester
1g". This is a user level memory tester.
I also have a server that occasionally dies. It started doing this late
last year under Fedora27. I wasn't sure if it was a particular kernel
change or hardware, but I replaced the m
Having updated to F29 from F27 (which seems to be generally working well
:) ), I have one issue with our systems due to the new authselect system.
When I enable the nis (YP) system for logins the /etc/nsswitch.conf file
loses the "mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return]" for hosts searches. One
result
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:16 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 12/02/18 21:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am using a home plug device to get ethernet access across the home
electrical
wires. The home plug device is provide 500 Mb/s, so having seen this
thread
On 12/02/18 21:51, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 02/13/18 05:43, Stephen Morris wrote:
I am using a home plug device to get ethernet access across the home electrical
wires. The home plug device is provide 500 Mb/s, so having seen this thread I've
checked my ethernet configuration and like Terry is sayin
I have just noticed that most of my systems now have their Ethernet
interfaces running at 100 MBits/s half duplex rather than the expected
1GBits/s.
I think some update has caused this to happen, probably about 5 days ago
(noticed something was slow). These are KDE/Plasma GUI systems but I'm
it
had a "route" command matching the system "ip route" command.
Anyway thanks for the info.
Terry
On 06/02/18 22:07, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 02/06/2018 01:16 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 06/02/18 20:21, James Hogarth wrote:
On 3 February 2018 at 22:20, Terry Barnaby wrote:
O
On 06/02/18 20:21, James Hogarth wrote:
On 3 February 2018 at 22:20, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 02/02/18 16:40, Bill Shirley wrote:
You didn't post the command or its output. How can anyone help you?
What's the output of these two commands?
ip -o -4 addr
ip -o -4 route
Bill
ip -o
On 02/02/18 16:40, Bill Shirley wrote:
You didn't post the command or its output. How can anyone help you?
What's the output of these two commands?
ip -o -4 addr
ip -o -4 route
Bill
ip -o -4 addr
1: lo inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo\ valid_lft forever
preferred_lft forever
2: enp2s0
I tied using "ip route" it had the same effect.
On 02/02/18 14:21, Bill Shirley wrote:
Use 'ip' and add the dev parameter:
ip route add default 173.xxx.yyy.zzz dev ccast
man route:
NOTE
This program is obsolete. For replacement check ip route.
Bill
On 2/2/2018 8:
A strange one this. I was trying to change the default route of a
machine for testing a different gateway.
I ran:
route del default gw
route add default gw
However the second command did not add the route and I could not add the
old default route back. There were no errors on stdout or in
On 02/02/18 07:42, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 02/02/18 00:41, Ed Greshko wrote:
I've not tried this since I don't have a need for ypbind.
One may also consider copying /lib/systemd/system/ypbind.service to
/etc/systemd/system and then inserting the line,
ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/sleep 5
On 02/02/18 00:41, Ed Greshko wrote:
I've not tried this since I don't have a need for ypbind.
One may also consider copying /lib/systemd/system/ypbind.service to
/etc/systemd/system and then inserting the line,
ExecStartPre=/usr/bin/sleep 5
From the systemd documentation
ExecStart= command
I am finding on my systems that ypbind is failing occasionally at boot
(about 30% of the time).
[ OK ] Started Network Manager Wait Online.
[ OK ] Reached target Network is Online.
Mounting /src...
Mounting /scratch...
Starting NIS/YP (Network Information Service)
On 30/01/18 00:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/29/18 17:40, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Now I understand that NFS's latency with writes is a performance bottleneck,
but in
the past I have used the "async" mount option to good effect to minimise this.
It
does not appear to have any effec
On 29/01/18 09:05, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/29/18 15:47, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 19/01/18 15:11, Terry Barnaby wrote:
When doing a tar -xzf ... of a big source tar on an NFSv4 file system the time
taken is huge. I am seeing an overall data rate of about 1 MByte per second
across
the network
On 19/01/18 15:11, Terry Barnaby wrote:
When doing a tar -xzf ... of a big source tar on an NFSv4 file system
the time taken is huge. I am seeing an overall data rate of about 1
MByte per second across the network interface.
If I copy a single large file I see a network data rate of about 110
When doing a tar -xzf ... of a big source tar on an NFSv4 file system
the time taken is huge. I am seeing an overall data rate of about 1
MByte per second across the network interface.
If I copy a single large file I see a network data rate of about 110
MBytes/sec which is about the limit of t
On 01/01/18 20:53, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/02/18 04:42, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 01/01/18 20:38, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/01/2018 12:15 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I don't think it is that one. The display is fine all other applications run
fine. Its just that the Firefox tab does not loa
On 01/01/18 20:38, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 01/01/2018 12:15 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
I don't think it is that one. The display is fine all other
applications run fine. Its just that the Firefox tab does not load
any content for a while. I can still operate Firefox clicking on
things etc, b
On 01/01/18 18:08, Stephen Perkins wrote:
I had the same problem with FF 57 on Fedora 26; found solution on FF
forum:
go to about:config
and set accessibility.force_disabled = 1 (it's 0 by default)
worked for me.
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Terry Barnaby <mailto:ter...@bea
On 01/01/18 17:30, Peter Gueckel wrote:
It sounds like this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529922
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I don't t
On 01/01/18 15:07, George N. White III wrote:
On 1 January 2018 at 09:27, Fred Smith <mailto:fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 12:00:59PM +0000, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing issues with Firefox freezing up for 30secs or
>
Is anyone else seeing issues with Firefox freezing up for 30secs or more
when web pages are opened in TABS ?
Since the latest Firefox 57 this is happening a lot for me (every 10
mins or so). Seems to lockup while downloading the page. You can still
operate Firefox by clicking on menu's/Tab's e
On 05/12/16 08:38, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/05/2016 09:12 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/04/2016 11:54 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
On 05/12/16 06:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/04/2016 07:42 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
In F25 the SDDM no longer shows a list of users when NIS (ypbind) is
enabled and
On 05/12/16 06:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/04/2016 07:42 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
In F25 the SDDM no longer shows a list of users when NIS (ypbind) is
enabled and also it does not default to the last user logged in. kdm
appears to be the same (with UserList=true in /etc/kde/kdm/kdmrc).
Are
In F25 the SDDM no longer shows a list of users when NIS (ypbind) is
enabled and also it does not default to the last user logged in. kdm
appears to be the same (with UserList=true in /etc/kde/kdm/kdmrc).
Note this is on a KDE spin install, but I assume the SDDM would be the
same as for a Gnom
On 05/06/2014 08:02 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
Yeah. It's an inconvenience, but as long as yumex handle
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093927
Big issue here is that it has a duff MD5 checksum but
yum/rpm still tries to install it ...
--
users mail
On 09/27/2011 02:00 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 27 September 2011 10:59, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 09/26/2011 11:59 PM, Roger wrote:
>
>>> Some say that the new Fedora GUI is unhelpful and possibly difficult to
>>> use, preferring a simpler desktop.
>>
>> Ahh, this is all about GNOME 3. It's very
On 09/27/2011 04:42 PM, Doug Kuvaas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha
> wrote:
>> X11 is supposed to be upwards binary compatible. If it won't run old
>> applications, you should file a bug with Fedora. If you can figure
>> out what the difference is between th
On 09/26/2011 10:15 PM, Doug Kuvaas wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> On 09/26/2011 09:49 PM, Doug Kuvaas wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying to build an older version of X Server on Fedora 15 to
>>> allow me to run a legacy app
On 09/26/2011 09:49 PM, Doug Kuvaas wrote:
> I am trying to build an older version of X Server on Fedora 15 to
> allow me to run a legacy application. Fedora 8, which functions
> correctly for our application, will not install on a new computer for
> some reason, presumably because the new hardwar
On 09/26/2011 01:08 PM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
> On 09/25/2011 05:45 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> Anyone know why the NFS write performance with Fedora14 may be slow (without
>> async) ?
>> I have Gigabit networking which is all working fine and the systems in
>
On 09/25/2011 07:03 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> Try writing to a different type of filesystem. It might be the
> filesystem's fault. MacTCP on the Classic Mac OS got a real bad rap
> because FTP writes were very slow, but it was easy to show that the
> problem was in the Heirarchical Fi
On 09/25/2011 06:41 PM, JB wrote:
> Terry Barnaby beam.ltd.uk> writes:
>
>> ...
>> # Test1, defaults: nfs version 4, sync
>> Server /etc/exports: "/data *.kingnet(rw)"
>> Client /etc/fstab: "king.kingnet:/data /data nfs defaults 0 0"
>
On 09/25/2011 06:13 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> Are you using userspace NFS or the kernel NFS? The kernel NFS
> _should_ be faster.
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> I wonder if NFS is doing a complete sync() to disk on each file close
On 09/25/2011 04:39 PM, JB wrote:
> Terry Barnaby beam.ltd.uk> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> It would be useful to publish a test for
> # Test4, defaults: nfs version 3
> that is with "sync" option, so we could see if similar degradation was
> present with older
Anyone know why the NFS write performance with Fedora14 may be slow (without
async) ?
I have Gigabit networking which is all working fine and the systems in question
have been running Fedora in various forms for many years.
Writing a single large file across NFS is fine, about: 32MBytes/sec witho
Hi,
I am trying to get the Xilinx FPGA tools USB cables running under Fedora14
and have come up against a problem. The Xilinx system includes
a udev rules file that has a line entry like:
SUBSYSTEMS=="usb", ACTION=="add", ATTRS{idVendor}=="03fd",
ATTRS{idProduct}=="000d", RUN+="/sbin/fxload -v -t
On 02/05/2011 08:28 PM, compdoc wrote:
>> One of these drives had a faulty block which the drive had not been able
> to automatically relocate.
>
>
> Just curious, what's the reallocated sector count for the drive? And how
> many bad sectors do you feel comfortable with?
>
> I used to live with dri
Hi,
Just a bit of info. I have some Western Digital Caviar Green (Adv. Format),
WD20EARS drives. These have the "new" 4096 byte physical sector.
One of these drives had a faulty block which the drive had not been able
to automatically relocate.
I tried to force a relocation by overwriting the blo
On 02/04/2011 12:21 PM, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 20:47 +0000, Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> There is no need for NetworkManager in a home network anyway, it
>> just adds complications, gets in the way and consumes resources.
>
> Maybe on *your* home network. But it's
On 02/01/2011 06:30 PM, JB wrote:
> Terry Barnaby beam.ltd.uk> writes:
>
>> ...
>> Note I am using the "network" not "NetworkManager" service. The
>> NetworkManager
>> service does not work well for me with systems using networked /home
On 01/30/2011 08:40 PM, JB wrote:
> Terry Barnaby beam.ltd.uk> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> Your analysis is very plausible.
> I remember from Slackware (many years ago ...) - it took explicit steps to
> TERM active processes, reasonably waited for them, and then killed them
On 01/30/2011 06:51 PM, JB wrote:
> Terry Barnaby beam.ltd.uk> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> Firstly, I have to re-correct myself - my original debugging statemets were
> correct.
> I checked it on my machine and /proc/mounts is still available, so we should
> include it
On 01/30/2011 05:55 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> On 01/30/2011 02:11 PM, JB wrote:
>> JB gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>
>>> #
On 01/30/2011 02:11 PM, JB wrote:
> JB gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> #
>> # debugging snapshot statements
>> #
>> date>> /halt.debug
>> cat /etc/mtab>> /halt.debug
>> c
On 01/29/2011 11:42 PM, JB wrote:
> Terry Barnaby beam.ltd.uk> writes:
>
>> ...
>
> Give us unedited outputs:
> $ cat /etc/fstab
> $ cat /etc/mtab
> $ cat /proc/mounts
>
> JB
>
>
>
>
The above files:
/etc/fstab
==
Hi,
About 1 in 4 times Fedora 14 hangs during shutdown on at least 4 of my systems.
Looking at the shutdown messages (ESC in the splash screen) and adding some
debug statements to /etc/rc.d/rc0.d/S01halt, it hangs after the messages:
"Unmounting file systems"
"init: Re-executing
On 12/18/2010 04:02 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Saturday, December 18, 2010 03:08:45 am Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> It is strange, however, how the system can run perfectly fine with good
>> fast disk IO for a while and then go into this slow mode. In the slow
>> mode a command
On 12/18/2010 12:00 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday, December 17, 2010 06:14:31 pm Terry Barnaby wrote:
>> The two main RAID1 disks are WD10EARS (Green). I have seen reported some
>> issues with the performance of these but in my case they appear to work
>> fine when the
This is a strange one.
I have a home server (Pentium Core 2, Intel ICH10, 1G RAM, 2x SATA 1TByte
disks in Raid1, 1x 2TByte SATA and 1 x 1TByte SATA). This is used for normal
NFS and MythTv usage as well as httpd, network routing openvpn etc. It has been
running for about 2 years and 1 year under F
On 11/28/2010 10:52 PM, Hiisi wrote:
> su, 2010-11-28 kello 20:06 +0000, Terry Barnaby kirjoitti:
>> This is not so important as running 3D apps though. Blender will not
>> run on
>> either of these systems (huge delays when posting menus etc). Mind you
>> on
>>
On 11/28/2010 07:22 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:48:34 -0500,
>Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> It absolutely is, possibly I should have mentioned that. But it is not
>> intuitive that accelerated video drivers would map to lower frame rates
>> and less smooth screen updates.
Hi,
I have just updated from Fedora12 to Fedora14 on a few systems.
There is a problem with 3D graphics on at least two of these systems.
The one I am currently using has:
08:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV535 [Radeon X1650
Series] (rev 9e)
OpenGL renderer string: Gallium
I have just updated some systems for Fedora12 to Fedora14.
All has gone well and is working well, so far, except that
I don't seem to be able to control the mixer on the sound
hardware. Sound is working, in that I get the login music,
beeps etc.
Specifically I want to listen to audio from the Line
On 11/09/2010 03:13 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
> The system-config-kickstart utility gives the error "Could not open display
> because no X server is running" when started on the command line from a
> terminal
> in X. (Does not work from the menus either).
>
> Any idea
The system-config-kickstart utility gives the error "Could not open display
because no X server is running" when started on the command line from a terminal
in X. (Does not work from the menus either).
Any ideas ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscr
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
