Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

2025-05-31 Thread Robert Nichols via users
On 5/30/25 17:57, Robert Nichols via users wrote: On 5/30/25 10:23, Barry wrote: On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users wrote: Has anybody actually used this program?  Since it fails for me in two different environments, I can't see how. Well, the "Linux po

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

2025-05-30 Thread Robert Nichols via users
On 5/30/25 17:57, Robert Nichols via users wrote: Thread 59 "Thread (pooled)" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0x7fe5bbdfe6c0 (LWP 8783)] ___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x4054c348) ... Looks like I'm not alone. I've

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

2025-05-30 Thread Robert Nichols via users
On 5/30/25 10:23, Barry wrote: On 30 May 2025, at 14:14, Robert Nichols via users wrote: ___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x2aed4278d06f824f) at pthread_mutex_lock.c:80 80 unsigned int type = PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE_ELISION (mutex); That mutex address looks bad. Getting a

Re: shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

2025-05-30 Thread Robert Nichols via users
On 5/18/25 00:17, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 11:30 PM Robert Nichols via users wrote: I'm trying to use "shotcut", installed in a Fedora 41 virtual machine, to split up some large mp4 files. It can read the files and play the videos just fine, so there is

shotcut video editor segfaults in Fedora 41 VM

2025-05-17 Thread Robert Nichols via users
I'm trying to use "shotcut", installed in a Fedora 41 virtual machine, to split up some large mp4 files. It can read the files and play the videos just fine, so there is apparently no decoder issue, but any time I try to do anything with the file the process segfaults. Suspecting there might be

Re: MATE desktop not offered by Fedora 42 greeter

2025-03-06 Thread Robert Nichols via users
FWIW, the upgrade was from a Fedora 41 VM in which my MATE desktop was working just fine. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. On 3/6/25 22:46, Robert Nichols via users wrote: In my newly upgraded Fedora 42 VM, the greeter

MATE desktop not offered by Fedora 42 greeter

2025-03-06 Thread Robert Nichols via users
In my newly upgraded Fedora 42 VM, the greeter offers me only "GNOME" and "GNOME Classic" even though dnf reports: Package "mate-desktop-1.28.2-4.fc42.x86_64" is already installed. I tried reinstalling mate-desktop, but that did not help. How can I get MATE desktop to work? -- Bob Nichols

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

2025-01-27 Thread Robert Nichols via users
On 1/27/25 16:01, Stephen Morris wrote: The issue with qgnomeplatform makes it look like the maintainer hasn't bothered to produce a qt6 version, or as indicated it doesn't obsolete the qt5 version. While removing the conflicting package usually removes the conflict issue, it is not necessarily

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

2025-01-24 Thread Robert Nichols via users
On 1/23/25 12:30, Barry wrote: On 23 Jan 2025, at 17:53, Robert Nichols via users wrote: qgnomeplatform-qt5 Try removing conflicting packages like qgnomeplatform-qt5 and see if the upgrade will run. Check only a small number of packages will be removed. You can always reinstall any app

Re: Update failure in Fedora 40

2025-01-23 Thread Robert Nichols via users
On 1/23/25 12:29, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:52 PM Robert Nichols via users wrote: I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean update state in the current Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it installed many updates i

Update failure in Fedora 40

2025-01-23 Thread Robert Nichols via users
I am trying to upgrade my laptop to Fedora 41, but I cannot get a clean update state in the current Fedora 40. I ran "dnf update" successfully and it installed many updates including a new kernel. After a reboot, much to my surprise dnfdragora reported 18 updates available. Running "dnf update"