Re: Working with secureboot

On 7/21/25 5:05 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 7/18/25 5:54 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: following command, run as root: mokutil --sb-state Secure boot is enabled in the bios. Yes fedora recognizes that. If it says only "SecureBoot enabled" then t

Re: Working with secureboot

On 7/18/25 5:54 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Robert McBroom via users wrote: The drivers work for two other installed fedora systems but the new system just goes to nouveau. Leary of doing something that would break the working systems. Would think there would be a way to connect to existing

Re: Working with secureboot

On 7/17/25 10:02 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Tim via users wrote: On Wed, 2025-07-16 at 13:39 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: My understanding was that it was a new password entry Todd Zullinger's earlier post said: You should already have the key, which is stored at /etc/pki/a

Re: Problem accessing lvm on nvme drive

On 7/15/25 1:22 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 7/13/25 1:31 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: During boot I get the message block nvme0n1: No UUID available providing old NGUID When I try to mount the lvm I get the message ~# mount /dev/mapper/fedora /sd1 mount: /sd1: fsconfig system call

Re: Problem accessing lvm on nvme drive

On 7/16/25 11:05 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 15 Jul 2025, at 05:51, Robert McBroom via users wrote: ├─nvme0n1p5 │ LVM2_mem LVM2 001 v1gXoi-sKLO-fS0t-oKxo-en1J-7vOu-BH8Hal └─nvme0n1p6 LVM2_mem LVM2 001 lQ45eA-ARYv-JiVX-JRjR-eyHl-NCXO-vkB2m0 Why are there two LVM2 partitions? That is

Re: Working with secureboot

On 7/15/25 4:32 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Tue, 2025-07-15 at 01:00 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Didn't get very far :~# mokutil --import /etc/pki/akmods/certs/public_key.der input password: input password again: Failed to enroll new keys Just in general, and WITHOUT (!) telli

Re: Working with secureboot

On 7/15/25 1:48 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Robert McBroom via users wrote: Didn't get very far :~# mokutil --import /etc/pki/akmods/certs/public_key.der input password: input password again: Failed to enroll new keys What does `mokutil --sb-state` (with root privileges) report? It shoul

Re: Problem accessing lvm on nvme drive

On 7/15/25 8:24 AM, Roger Heflin wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 11:51 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: and /dev/nvme0n1p6 while pasting got a line feed in the text LVM2_mem LVM2 001 lQ45eA-ARYv-JiVX-JRjR-eyHl-NCXO-vkB2m0 ~# lvmdiskscan -l WARNING: only

Re: Working with secureboot

On 7/14/25 8:18 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Robert McBroom via users wrote: Need to get my NVIDIA DRIVERS  registered. Gnome tells me they are ready and gives me a code. A window opens telling me to restart and enter the code when prompted. Selecting the button brings up a new window telling me

Re: Problem accessing lvm on nvme drive

On 7/13/25 5:08 PM, Barry wrote: On 13 Jul 2025, at 21:32, Robert McBroom via users wrote:  During boot I get the message block nvme0n1: No UUID available providing old NGUID When I try to mount the lvm I get the message ~# mount /dev/mapper/fedora /sd1 mount: /sd1: fsconfig system

Working with secureboot

Need to get my NVIDIA DRIVERS  registered. Gnome tells me they are ready and gives me a code. A window opens telling me to restart and enter the code when prompted. Selecting the button brings up a new window telling me "mokutil --import" has failed and to re-enter the code. It didn't do anyth

Problem accessing lvm on nvme drive

During boot I get the message block nvme0n1: No UUID available providing old NGUID When I try to mount the lvm I get the message ~# mount /dev/mapper/fedora /sd1 mount: /sd1: fsconfig system call failed: /dev/mapper/fedora Can't lookup blockdev.   dmesg(1) may have more information after

secure boot questions

With secure boot enabled putting a 3 in the grub boot line to get a command session just gives a black screen. Fom a desktop session the ctrl,alt fn4 sequence just gives the efi heading on a blank screen. Is there a way to get a command session? -- _

lxde desktop problem

Trying to change the wallpaper on new f42 lxde session. pcmanfm --set-wallpaper="/usr/share/lxde/wallpapers/lxde_blue.jpg" pops up message window saying error desktop manager is not active Where can the desktop manager be found? -- ___ users mailin

Lost menu bar on konsole

Installed a new f42 system on a new computer. When using konsole it has toolbars but the menu bar with the drop down menus is not there. Used it forever and greatly prefer it to the toolbars. Looked for a .conf file that might set things but don't find any in the places I would expect. How can

Re: Strange problem with chroot

On 6/16/25 10:16 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Robert McBroom via users wrote: From the Fedora 41 installation ~]# ld.so --help [...] Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order:  x86-64-v4  x86-64-v3  x86-64-v2 None of those say "supported, searched" which in

Re: Strange problem with chroot

On 6/14/25 6:01 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 14 Jun 2025, at 04:35, Robert McBroom via users wrote: CentOs 9.4 installation is going into kernel panic. Trying to get access to the system from a running Fedora 41 installation. ~]# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sysimage ~]# for dir in /dev /proc /sys

Re: waterfox rpms?

On 6/13/25 5:19 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 6/13/25 2:08 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2025-06-13 at 13:55 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, It is time for me to upgrade my waterfox and waterfox classic. Problem:  I installed them so long ago I forgot where I got

Strange problem with chroot

CentOs 9.4 installation is going into kernel panic. Trying to get access to the system from a running Fedora 41 installation. ~]# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sysimage ~]# for dir in /dev /proc /sys;do mount --bind $dir /mnt/sysimage/$dir;done ~]# chroot /mnt/sysimage Fatal glibc error: CPU does not sup

Re: NVIDIA Again

On 6/11/25 3:22 AM, Barry wrote: On 9 Jun 2025, at 19:24, Robert McBroom via users wrote:  System has  a Geforce GT710 graphics card. When Fedora was installed it tried to load the 575 series drivers. Fedora does not install nvidia drivers. It was something you would have done. With

NVIDIA Again

System has  a Geforce GT710 graphics card. When Fedora was installed it tried to load the 575 series drivers. Was able to force the 470xx driver files which are the ones for the card. Now I'm getting a conflict as update wants to install libnvidia-cfg-3:575.57.08-1.fc41.x86_64 and fails with

User setting problem

When starting emacs I get the following message :~# (emacs-gtk_x11:52661): dbind-WARNING**: 12:32:07.584: Couldn't connect to accessibility bus: Failed to connect to socket /run/user/1000/at-spi/bus_0: Connection refused What needs to be done to get the permissions correct? user xpq2 gid is 1

Re: Access qcow2 vm file from host problem

On 5/15/25 9:27 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Have a Fc39 server qemu/kvm virtual machine. Trying to access the filesystem from the host machine.  The following commands--- :~# modprobe nbd max_part=8 :~# qemu-nbd --connect=/dev/nbd0 /var/lib/libvirt/images/Fed39.qcow2 :~# fdisk

Access qcow2 vm file from host problem

Have a Fc39 server qemu/kvm virtual machine. Trying to access the filesystem from the host machine.  The following commands--- :~# modprobe nbd max_part=8 :~# qemu-nbd --connect=/dev/nbd0 /var/lib/libvirt/images/Fed39.qcow2 :~# fdisk /dev/nbd0 -l Disk /dev/nbd0: 60 GiB, 64424509440 bytes, 1258

Re: F42 Server Installer problems

On 5/12/25 9:02 AM, Tim via users wrote: On Mon, 2025-05-12 at 08:01 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: New system with 1.2T drive. Has Windows 11 on it. Split the drive with the windows manager for 1.2T free space. Trying to put f42 server on the free space. The installer options for

F42 Server Installer problems

New system with 1.2T drive. Has Windows 11 on it. Split the drive with the windows manager for 1.2T free space. Trying to put f42 server on the free space. The installer options for custom install won't enable. Only the automatic choice. Would typically make three partitions boot,root and home

Re: Managing dual boot

On 3/29/25 12:01 AM, Felix Miata wrote: Robert McBroom composed on 2025-03-28 22:48 (UTC-0400): Felix Miata wrote: ... menuentry "Fedora 40 defkernel 3 on P18" { load_video set gfxpayload=keep search --no-floppy --set=root --hint-baremetal=ahci0,gpt18 --label

Curious messages from dnf

Get the following at the end of "dnf update" of f41 - >>> Running trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.12-1.fc41.x86_64 >>> Finished trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.12-1.fc41.x86_64 >>> Scriptlet output: >>> Failed to connect to user scope bus via machine transport: No medium f

Some kind of loop at the end of "dnf5 update"

looping output to window -- [174/174] Removing openvpn-0:2.6.13-1.fc41.x86_64   100% [==] |   1.0   B/s |  92.0   B |  00m00s Running post-transaction scriptlet: kernel-core-0:6.13.10-200.fc41.x86_64 Finished post-transact

Managing dual boot

On 3/27/25 12:37 AM, Felix Miata wrote: Robert McBroom composed on 2025-03-27 00:02 (UTC-0400): Felix Miata wrote: Simplest: remove Grub from B, or disable Grub on B. Only one Grub per PC is needed. After each new kernel is installed to B, update Grub on A with os-prober enabled and with GR

Re: Managing dual boot

On 3/23/25 7:36 AM, Felix Miata wrote: Simplest: remove Grub from B, or disable Grub on B. Only one Grub per PC is needed. After each new kernel is installed to B, update Grub on A with os-prober enabled and with GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU="y" in /etc/default/grub. Even that frequent Grub maintenanc

Re: Managing dual boot

On 3/23/25 4:46 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: Hello, I have a machine with a dual fedora boot on 2 drives (with grub2) I daily maintain one (say A on /dev/sda4), and occasionally the other one (say B on /dev/sdc5). The problem is when I update B, grub is not update properly, i.e., I canno

Re: kernel 6.13.x usb wifi problems

On 3/22/25 7:31 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 1:22 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: Have two usb wifi adapters using Realtek chips that were noted to be supported in the recent kernels. One is now seen but the other is not. Both show in the list from lsusb Bus

kernel 6.13.x usb wifi problems

Have two usb wifi adapters using Realtek chips that were noted to be supported in the recent kernels. One is now seen but the other is not. Both show in the list from lsusb Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0bda:8812 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. RTL8812AU 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2T2R DB WLAN Adapter Bus 001 D

Re: Systemd Craziness

On 3/12/25 10:51 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 3/10/25 4:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 04:34:35PM -0400, Robert McBroom wrote: On 3/9/25 2:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 06:45:24PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote

Re: Systemd Craziness

On 3/10/25 4:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 04:34:35PM -0400, Robert McBroom wrote: On 3/9/25 2:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 06:45:24PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: Hi, this seems like a series of standalone issues caused

Re: Systemd Craziness

On 3/9/25 2:06 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 06:45:24PM +0100, Michal Schorm wrote: Hi, this seems like a series of standalone issues caused by implementation of this F42 Change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers Specificall

Re: internal network

On 3/2/25 8:10 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 2 Mar 2025, at 12:25, Will McDonald wrote: Your life would be made a lot simpler if you had a small switch or router, as Tim suggested. You can even get USB-powered devices. All the ISP modems I have ever seen have a 3 or 4 port switch built in.

Systemd Craziness

Updating f41 ends with messages. Running trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.12-1.fc41.x86_64 Finished trigger-install scriptlet: systemd-0:256.12-1.fc41.x86_64 Scriptlet output: Creating group 'passim' with GID 990. Creating user 'passim' (Local Caching Server) with UID 990 and GID 990. Fa

Re: Quickemu

On 2/26/25 3:57 PM, Slade Watkins wrote: On 2/26/2025 7:07 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: This is neat. Have you tried it out yet? I'm adding it to my to-do list as we speak. Yes, I've tried a few VMs and it seems to work, though the MacOS ones have trouble starting (blank screen and no kb

Re: questions: file systems (was: /var/lib/flatpak/repo/objects...)

On 1/20/25 1:04 PM, home user via users wrote: On 1/20/25 12:35 AM, Robin Laing wrote: ... I have lost data with LVM's and btrfs at different times in the past and have to regain my trust. ... The Btrfs file system received numerous updates from the upstream in Red Hat Enterprise Linux versi

Re: Implementing Secure Boot

On 1/14/25 2:03 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/13/25 8:52 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 1/13/25 1:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/13/25 10:06 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 1/11/25 2:35 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/10/25 8:53 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: I have a system

Re: Implementing Secure Boot

On 1/13/25 1:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/13/25 10:06 AM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 1/11/25 2:35 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/10/25 8:53 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: I have a system with two installations of F41 and a Windows 10 installation. Interested in moving it to

Re: Implementing Secure Boot

On 1/11/25 2:35 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 1/10/25 8:53 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: I have a system with two installations of F41 and a Windows 10 installation. Interested in moving it to secure boot which is not currently enabled in the bios. It is an HP Z440 Then turn it on

Implementing Secure Boot

I have a system with two installations of F41 and a Windows 10 installation. Interested in moving it to secure boot which is not currently enabled in the bios. It is an HP Z440 -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: qemu/kvm startup

On 12/29/24 4:40 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 29 Dec 2024, at 00:12, Jonathan Billings wrote: libvirtd was changed to use socket activation, so it *should* start if the libvirtd.socket is enabled and activated Running Virtual machine Manager will connect to the socket and every thing will

Re: qemu/kvm startup

On 12/29/24 1:33 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 01:00:18 -0500 Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 12/28/24 2:09 PM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: What gives ? systemctl is-enabled libvirtd Says enabled but still requires the start command to find the

Re: qemu/kvm startup

On 12/28/24 2:09 PM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:00:17 -0500 Robert McBroom via users wrote: What needs to be set to get the virtual machines to initialize on the second installation? Just enable this service I think. What gives ? systemctl is-enabled

qemu/kvm startup

Have two installations of f41 setup to run virtual machines. On one, all that is required to get started is to execute "virt-manager" in a terminal with privilege. On the other, I have to use "systemctl start libvirtd" first or "virt-manager" doesn't find any of the installed machines. Nothing

Re: NTFS partitions automounting

On 12/4/24 4:09 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 5/12/24 08:03, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on booting. They are not in fstab. Is there a flag that causes the automount? Would really like the mount to be on demand. If you

NTFS partitions automounting

Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on booting. They are not in fstab. Is there a flag that causes the automount? Would really like the mount to be on demand. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Problem on gnome-disks on f41

Whenever I try to mount some additional partitions on the system drives the message box comes up saying that "Error mounting filesystem 'Not authorized to perform operation (udisks-error-quark, 4)'". Previously a box would open allowing a password to be entered. How can the earlier behavior be

Re: Strange loss of graphic display

On 11/16/24 08:15, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 5:53 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: similar to earlier thread. System goes blank and does not resume from wherever.  Using LXDE and have set all the suspend, etc. options I can find to never. I can

Re: Strange loss of graphic display

On 11/16/24 08:15, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 5:53 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: similar to earlier thread. System goes blank and does not resume from wherever.  Using LXDE and have set all the suspend, etc. options I can find to never. I can

Re: Strange loss of graphic display

On 11/15/24 18:53, Stephen Morris wrote: On 16/11/24 09:14, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2024-11-15 at 16:52 -0500, Robert McBroom via users wrote: similar to earlier thread. System goes blank and does not resume from wherever.  Using LXDE and have set all the suspend, etc. options

Strange loss of graphic display

similar to earlier thread. System goes blank and does not resume from wherever.  Using LXDE and have set all the suspend, etc. options I can find to never. I can access the system from firefox on another machine and open a terminal. Is there a command that will restart the graphical display?

Re: CentOS - what to use now that CentOS 7 is EOL

On 10/31/24 7:47 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, My personal setup is three Fedora machines (two laptops), a Windows 10 laptop, and an older desktop used for backup/storage. The last has been running a variant of CentOS for the longest time; backup is done hourly on the Fedora machines usin

Re: How do I check to see if my xorg display manager is running?

On 11/1/24 9:02 AM, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: lightdm nor slick-greeter (since January, for F39 and F40). I suspect a change in your account profiles (shell for example). Look in your ~/.xsession-errors or test with a brand new test user. Funny. I liked the version of Thunderbird on

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On 10/30/24 4:39 PM, t_...@tiscali.it wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:17:56 -0700 Dave Close wrote: Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I've made the upgrade from Fedora 39 to 41 (Xfce). E

Re: What replaces --allowerasing in dnf5?

On 10/25/24 15:08, Andre Robatino wrote: Thanks for this. I thought that dnf5 didn't have either the --skip-broken or --skip-unavailable options (despite dnf5 itself recommending those options when a command failed), but after reading this I retried my install command with those options AFTER

Re: KDE not Remaining Active at Startup

On 10/24/24 9:27 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 07:48 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: You can also of course use the execrable HyperKitty web interface, which I cordially detest. poc Test sends a bounce message that my emails have been received but I don&

Re: KDE not Remaining Active at Startup

On 10/24/24 5:46 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 09:12 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: On 24/10/24 09:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 08:50 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: Hi,     I randomly have an issue where having logged in to KDE from SDDM, the KDE

Re: My from address on this list

On 10/22/24 3:08 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/21/24 11:28 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:58 AM Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/21/24 9:09 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Why does my "From:" come out "Community support for Fedora users" when my posts show on this list? Ther

Re: why am I still on 39?

On 10/21/24 08:48, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/21/24 00:07, Felix Miata wrote: Samuel Sieb composed on 2024-10-20 23:11 (UTC-0700): ToddAndMargo wrote: # dnf history list | head -10 ID Command line   Date and time   Action(s) Altered    1 dnf remove mozjs91 2024-10-20 23:43

Re: FEDORA Lists access

On 10/21/24 1:49 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/20/24 8:49 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Can access the test forum on hyperkitty but my old login doesn't give me access. Saw the note to log in using the Fedora access system so I set up a new account. Get  a fancy logo but see no way

FEDORA Lists access

Can access the test forum on hyperkitty but my old login doesn't give me access. Saw the note to log in using the Fedora access system so I set up a new account. Get  a fancy logo but see no way to go to the list. Nothing seems to be getting posted on the mailing list. -- _

Re: Fedora 41 Install: Black Screen

On 10/20/24 7:18 PM, John Mellor wrote: On 2024-10-20 17:23, Barry wrote: On 20 Oct 2024, at 13:53, John Mellor wrote: I have an older Fedora 40 machine that I tried to install Fedora 41 on, and got a surprise. For a first attempt, I tried the as-documented dnf system-upgrade steps on a fu

Re: urgent major problem after f39 to f40 upgrade.

On 10/10/24 10:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 10/10/24 6:48 PM, home user via users wrote: I had to dnf remove jgit for the system-upgrade to work.  That was true both this morning and this evening.  I assume this is not relevant. The system-upgrade seemed to run to completion, but I could not

systemd

As more and more things get fed into systemd, is there a resource to actually follow using it? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Fresh install Fedora 40.

On 8/27/24 4:38 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote: Hi All, I had a total crash on my PC and had to restore Windows 10 Professionel by using Veeam Recorvery. This was succesfull , but the bootloader was gone and Fedora 40 also . I did install a 1 Terra SSD drive . I burned a netinstall DVD Fedora 40 a

Re: smartd configuration problem

On 8/17/24 9:20 AM, David King wrote: On 8/17/24 00:37, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 8/16/24 11:00 PM, David King wrote: On 8/16/24 11:32, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Boot process f40 system stops for a long time with a problem with smartd. Seems to access the system drives and

Re: Fedora 40: the last three kernels fail

On 8/24/24 9:46 AM, Walter H. via users wrote: On 24.08.2024 13:40, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 8/23/24 1:52 PM, Walter H. via users wrote: These three kernels kernel-6.10.4-200.fc40.x86_64 kernel-6.10.5-200.fc40.x86_64 kernel-6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64 won't start my VM properly,

Re: Fedora 40: the last three kernels fail

On 8/23/24 1:52 PM, Walter H. via users wrote: These three kernels kernel-6.10.4-200.fc40.x86_64 kernel-6.10.5-200.fc40.x86_64 kernel-6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64 won't start my VM properly, ends in a black screen, where I can see mouse moventments, and that was it ... no login, nothing; kernel-6.1

Re: boot stops before startx....

On 8/19/24 4:51 AM, François Patte wrote: Le 2024-08-18 16:05, francis.montag...@inria.fr a écrit : Hi. On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:59:09 +0200 François Patte wrote: Le 2024-08-17 06:07, Robert McBroom via users a écrit: The 6.10.x kernels are not yet supported for nvidia. I checked past

Re: smartd configuration problem

On 8/16/24 11:00 PM, David King wrote: On 8/16/24 11:32, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Boot process f40 system stops for a long time with a problem with smartd. Seems to access the system drives and note that they are SMART capable. The following entries are in the journal smartd[977

Re: boot stops before startx....

On 8/16/24 10:32 AM, François Patte wrote: Bonjour, Yesterday I updated my fc40 installation. I have an nvidia GPU with nvidia driver from rpm-fusion. I think that the akmod compilation of the driver went wrong and I could not boot until the graphical login screen: the screen remains black

smartd configuration problem

Boot process f40 system stops for a long time with a problem with smartd. Seems to access the system drives and note that they are SMART capable. The following entries are in the journal smartd[977]: Warning via /usr/libexec/smartmontools/smartdnotify to root produced>> smartd[977]: No conf

xscreensaver-gl

Fedora 40 system with X!! and icewm. The xscreensaver defaults to a message saying that it needs xscreensaver-gl packages. dnf shows the packages to be installed. Why doesn't xscreensaver find them? -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproje

graphical user login fails but root works

The display manager shows the standard user but entering the password just recycles back to the display manager. Switching to root logs in. A terminal boot lets the user log in but the graphical session fails to connect to the display. Creating an new user can log in from the display manager.

bug report fails

Trying to send a report to bugzilla. It fails. Don't know what this message implies --- Running report_Bugzilla --- Checking for duplicates Bug search failed. Server says: 400 Bad Request Creating a new bug... Failed to create bug. Server says: 400 Bad Request {"message":"The API key you specif

NetworkManager fights selinux

Fedora 40 system cold boot shows 10 selinux errors from NeworkManager on files in /run/NeworkManager.  The contents of this directory seem to be created during the boot process. They are owned by root and writeable, but apparently not in the correct selinux context. My attempt to submit a bug t

Re: Need system to run 24/7

On 5/25/24 11:25, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/25/24 8:39 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 07:51 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/25/24 4:01 AM, Barry wrote: On 24 May 2024, at 22:47, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: Seems it was relat

Re: Need system to run 24/7

On 5/25/24 8:39 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 07:51 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 5/25/24 4:01 AM, Barry wrote: On 24 May 2024, at 22:47, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: Seems it was related to Lenova wanting to get some kind of higher power s

Re: Need system to run 24/7

On 5/25/24 4:01 AM, Barry wrote: On 24 May 2024, at 22:47, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: Seems it was related to Lenova wanting to get some kind of higher power saving rating with Linux?? Don't know why they made it the default settings. I recall the default of suspend after 15 min

Re: Need system to run 24/7

On 5/24/24 11:57 PM, Tim via users wrote: On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 18:37 -0400, Robert McBroom via users wrote: This thread has been on before but I lost it. I need my system to run long simulations without my intervention. It keeps going to a reboot intermittently. The program has recovery that

Re: Need system to run 24/7

Thanks Michael, those changes to sleep.conf seem to have done the trick -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org

Re: 2 installations on the same PC - Add partition in Ftab

On 5/24/24 5:23 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2024-05-23 at 19:43 -0300, soles.g wrote: I did two installations of Fedora40 on the same hard drive. ¿Esto fue a propósito o por error? No está claro para qué necesitas dos instalaciones de F40. Was this on purpose or by mistake? It

Need system to run 24/7

This thread has been on before but I lost it. I need my system to run long simulations without my intervention. It keeps going to a reboot intermittently.  The program has recovery that all is not lost with a shutdown but the time getting back to check on the system.  Don't remember the setting

Re: MS Bitlocker Blue Screen on Reboot

On 5/21/24 8:38 AM, George N. White III wrote: On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 6:47 PM Tim Evans wrote: [...] .Does Fedora re-package vendor firmware updates? Will give your suggestion a try when I have a chance. Fedora has `fwdupd` to install vendor firmware updates. Use fwupdt

Re: What is Castor ? Att.Jonathan Billings.

On 5/11/24 08:36, John Pilkington wrote: On 10/05/2024 15:51, John Pilkington wrote: On 10/05/2024 15:00, George N. White III wrote: On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 5:13 PM John Pilkington mailto:johnpilk...@gmail.com>> wrote:     On 08/05/2024 20:13, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 5/8/24 10:50 AM, John

Re: Any clue what I did to nouveau?

On 5/6/24 1:14 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: This is just curiosity since I fixed it by installing nvidia drivers from rpmfusion, but here's what happened: When I installed fedora 40 workstation, I saw that the nouveau drivers (for the first time in years) had correctly decided to run at the native 38

Strange messages from DNF

The last update had something happen.  What is happening with dracut? Anyone see such? 88x2bu.ko.xz: Running module version sanity check.  - Original module    - No original module exists within this kernel  - Installation    - Installing to /lib/modules/6.8.8-300.fc40.x86_64/extra/ depmod.

Re: Fedora 40 - KeePass fails to run

On 4/28/24 10:41 PM, John List wrote: Thanks.  I just looked at the other versions to see how they differ.  They are forks off the original.  I prefer to stay with the main one.  I did open a bug and they traced it to "Confirmed this is caused by zlib-ng migration.".  I am not sure when it wil

Re: Fedora 40 - KeePass fails to run

On 4/25/24 10:11, John List wrote: Hi, Just an FYI that KeePass is failing to run on my recently upgraded Fedora 40 machine.  I'm not sure of the correct place to report the issue. image.png Run the zipped keepass with mono with no problems.-- __

Re: how long does dnf system-upgrade take?

On 4/14/24 14:20, Tim via users wrote: On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 09:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: Then in corporate life, I needed to ensure a stable development environment. This is one of the big problems with computers in the work place. You may have single-task computers which you want to work,

Re: Fedora 40 is available

On 4/24/24 22:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote: It looks like Fedora 40 just dropped! Upgrade instructions at . RPMFushion folks should wait about a month before upgrading. There always seems to be a lot of video problems afte

Re: Failed to find a suitable stage1 device

On 4/3/24 5:45 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 4/4/24 00:50, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Tue, 2 Apr 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote: The efi partition probably needs to be bigger than that, but it also has to be mounted at /boot/efi as indicated. Ah!  With custom partitioning, anaconda needs to be expl

Re: libvirtd.service start

On 3/22/24 6:30 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 22 Mar 2024, at 00:54, Robert McBroom via users wrote: looking at the status it shows preset:disabled As I understand it preset is used somewhere in the initial installation of fedora to figure out which services should be enabled by default

Re: libvirtd.service start

On 3/21/24 4:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/21/24 12:20, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 3/20/24 10:32 AM, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:49 AM Robert McBroom via users   wrote: Recently libvirtd.service is not starting on boot. I have to manually start it with systemctl

Re: libvirtd.service start

On 3/21/24 4:29 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:20 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: virt- manager starts but says it cannot connect to anything. I have six virtual machines I use for various purposes. In virt-manager, if you select the Edit menu and then "Conne

  1   2   3   4   >