> On 03/30/2011 10:58 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>>> On 03/25/2011 07:12 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>>
>>>> Should the 389ds be able to understand "usercertificate;binary", and
>>>> is
>>>> this a misconfiguration on my part in the
> On 03/25/2011 07:12 AM, Luke Schierer wrote:
>> Should the 389ds be able to understand "usercertificate;binary", and is
>> this a misconfiguration on my part in the directory server, or is that
>> not
>> something I should be expecting the directory to
We have a java application that is attempting to pull the userCertificate
attribute from our 389ds ldap server. Looking at the ldap logs, I see its
request, and it looks like it should be working, except for one oddity, it
is asking for the attribute "usercertificate;binary". By attaching
eclipse
Hi all,
I have been using fedora directory server/389 directory server for a
couple years now with out any real issues, so I want to start off by
thanking all of the developers for the hours they put into making it
available to us.
Lately I have had the need to look at storeing x509 certificates
Has anyone put the dsgw behind linux virtual server successfully? I am
trying to set it up using lvs-dr, and while I can connect to each real
server directly, I cannot connect if I go through the lvs vip. If someone
has a working lvs.cf that they could share, or tips on making this work,
that wou
