On 30. 3. 2016 at 06:35:19, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/29/2016 07:36 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote:
> > If I run something like, "dnf -y install ", and is already
> > installed, DNF gives a response like the following.
> >
> > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:02 ago on ...
> > Pack
On 10. 12. 2015 at 22:21:42, Tim wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 09 December 2015, Ralf Corsepius sent:
> > My view: The only thing that was wrong with yum, was it being
> > work-in-progress, when its maintainer passed away.
>
> One hopes that something as central as the updating/installing tool
>
Hey,
> 1. Why does `dnf group remove lxqt` wants to remove everything on my system?
> Most of it is not explicitely installed by me
> https://paste.fedoraproject.org/291300/
That might be the reason. Dnf removes parts of the system that are marked as
"installed only as a dependency" as soon as t
On 3. 11. 2015 at 10:49:43, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> Hi! I am trying that, before f23 is out, to get used with dnf.
> As such i am trying to install dnf but also to install the dnf-yum layer
> (just in case my reflexes will kick in :) ) but i have an conflict with
> yum .. and if i try to remove yu
On 12. 10. 2015 at 12:04:00, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> I built my own .rpm's for a meta package. These packages are only a
> modification of an existing Fedora package. Before I installed my own
> packages, I first removed the original version from Fedora.
>
> Thus now $ dnf list installed return co
On 20. 8. 2015 at 08:42:31, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I used the -v option and saw all these messages for all of my repos
> (Fedora, Fedora-update, Adobe, rpmfusion free and non-free). I kind of
> get the no deltainfo message. I did not download the delta rpms to my
> local repos for Fedora and Fe
On 21. 7. 2015 at 20:33:27, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:10:10AM +0200, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > I'm sorry but "clean all" is not necessary at all! "clean metadata" or
> > "clean expire-cache" should be sufficient.
>
> You don't even need to do that. Just use the --refresh flag
On 20. 7. 2015 at 10:12:35, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 16:02:11 +0200,
>
> Jan Zelený wrote:
> >On 20. 7. 2015 at 08:57:41, kevin martin wrote:
> >> I'm with Jan...Thank God for yum-deprecated. Been trying to get systemd
> >>
On 20. 7. 2015 at 08:57:41, kevin martin wrote:
> I'm with Jan...Thank God for yum-deprecated. Been trying to get systemd
> updated with DNF forever and it's been throwing an error about
> fedora-release..yum-deprecated has it handled. The whole skip-broken part
> of yum makes it so much easier t
On 20. 7. 2015 at 09:43:45, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:00:16AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Javier Perez
wrote:
> > > > This is weird.
> > > > Software Updates on the Control Panel says that there are 39 u
On 18. 7. 2015 at 17:59:49, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I see that dnf, in its infinite wisdom, has classified
> ignoring packages it can't find as a bug, therefore
> if you say
>
> dnf install `cat f22-missing.txt`
>
> to install as much stuff as possible in your new
> f22 as you used to have in f20, i
On 19. 7. 2015 at 20:39:36, Javier Perez wrote:
> Ok, just did a dnf clean all , and the dnf update and the updates showed up
>
> Weird.
>
> JP
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Javier Perez wrote:
> > This is weird.
> > Software Updates on the Control Panel says that there are 39 updates
>
On 27. 5. 2015 at 20:21:08, jd1008 wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 08:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 08:02:55PM -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> >> I had to use
> >> # /bin/yum-deprecated check all
> >> Yum command has been deprecated, use dnf instead.
> >> See 'man dnf' and 'man yum2dnf' f
On 27. 5. 2015 at 12:33:19, antonio montagnani wrote:
> if I issue the command dnf-2 migrate I get:
>
>
> vim-minimal-7.4.475-2.fc20.x86_64 found in DNFDB; skipping
> vlc-2.1.5-1.fc20.x86_64 found in DNFDB; skipping
> vino-3.14.2-1.fc21.x86_64 found in DNFDB; skipping
> vim-common-7.4.027-2.f
On 27. 5. 2015 at 03:56:11, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
> Do I need to do anything more with this Fedora 22 beta system?
>
> # dnf update
> Last metadata expiration check performed 0:18:24 ago on Wed May 27
> 03:30:41 2015.
> Dependencies resolved.
> Nothing to do.
> Complete!
>
> Th
On 7. 4. 2015 at 17:40:06, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:30:21 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > You can remove yum and install dnf-yum package which provides an alias but
> > I wouldn't really recommend that for Fedora 21 yet
>
> Even with Fedora 22 there are explicit dependencie
On 15. 12. 2014 at 22:10:21, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 10:34:30 AM Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Question: why do stuff like createrepo, fedup, livecd-tools, etc still
> > depend on yum? Should they be made to depend on dnf now, in which case,
> > should there be a bug report
On 15. 12. 2014 at 10:34:30, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Because (from what I understood, perhaps incorrectly) yum is going away in
> favor dnf, I was trying to get used to the latter. Because the former is so
> ingrained in me, I was trying to get rid of it from the system so that not
> having it avail
On 15. 12. 2014 at 13:03:54, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Ranjan Maitra
>
> wrote:
> > Because (from what I understood, perhaps incorrectly) yum is going away in
> > favor dnf, I was trying to get used to the latter. Because the former is
> > so ingrained in me, I was tr
On 15. 12. 2014 at 17:23:48, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:46:53 +
>
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 10:34 -0600, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > > Because (from what I understood, perhaps incorrectly) yum is going
> > > away in favor dnf, I was trying to get
On 9. 12. 2014 at 18:52:29, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > I'm sorry, I'm confused.
> > The problem is that it seems with every shell startup, some dnf command is
> > run (perhaps check-update?). I did not run the command. I don't want it
> > to run
On 9. 12. 2014 at 07:06:52, Neal Becker wrote:
> After fedup f20->f21, on every shell startup I see:
>
> Repository google-chrome is listed more than once in the configuration
>
> I don't want this check run on each shell start. For one thing, I believe
> it is causing sometimes long delays. Ho
On 3. 9. 2014 at 10:54:07, Balint Szigeti wrote:
> hello
>
> I don't know where I should send this email but I'd like to ask the DNF
> developer to the DNF application examine the proxy settings and if the
> user run the DNF command with debug option list the all steps instead of
> yum.
>
> I jus
On 16. 7. 2014 at 11:07:06, Neal Becker wrote:
> Sorry, I know this subject has been written about before. But google shows
> mostly 5 year old info.
>
> What are some recommendations for a relatively high performance laptop that
> works well on linux, and without paying windoze tax?
Just yester
On 16. 6. 2014 at 09:19:21, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > ad b) how many times have this feature actually saved you from erasing
the
> > kernel? In 10+ years using Linux I have never managed to do this
> >
On 16. 6. 2014 at 07:49:55, David wrote:
> On 6/16/2014 7:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 06/16/14 19:00, David wrote:
> >> On 6/16/2014 1:05 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >>> On 06/16/14 12:27, Rejy M Cyriac wrote:
> By the way, 'dnf erase kernel' scares me :-O
> >>>
> >>> FWIW, it has been sugges
On 14. 6. 2014 at 11:05:03, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 06/14/2014 12:05 AM, Aleksandar Kostadinov wrote:
> > Tom Horsley wrote, On 06/07/2014 03:57 PM (EEST):
> >> On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 07:47:37 -0500
> >>
> >> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >>> For one thing the depsolving algorithm used by yum is slow.
>
On 16. 6. 2014 at 07:19:45, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 06/15/2014 11:23 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 06/15/14 19:02, Tim wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2014-06-15 at 18:27 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >>> OK I read FAQ.
> >>>
> >>> http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/user_faq.html#why-do-i-get-different-res
On 9. 6. 2014 at 15:28:44, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 09:45 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 6. 6. 2014 at 16:56:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 14:46 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> >
On 9. 6. 2014 at 15:17:47, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > On 06/09/2014 12:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> >> Nope, yumex has only a very little to do with yum, it's a separate
> >> project.
> >> You can us
On 9. 6. 2014 at 17:12:37, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Jonathan Dieter lesbg.com> writes:
> > > The list of missing yum options is both outdated and incomplete. For
> > > example, it's missing "includepkgs" (a repository option), for people
> > > who
> > > need to access specific packages from non-Fed
On 9. 6. 2014 at 16:41:59, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:59:15AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> >>> till October) will give folks plenty of time to hone their dnf skills.
> >>> IMO, for many
On 9. 6. 2014 at 00:58:31, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 06/09/2014 12:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > Nope, yumex has only a very little to do with yum, it's a separate
> > project.
> > You can use PackageKit or the GNOME software center which will both soon
> > use the sa
On 8. 6. 2014 at 09:45:44, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 06/06/14 20:46, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
> > wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
> > have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put
On 7. 6. 2014 at 13:08:42, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> >> The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
> >
> > wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they have
> > got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put together
On 6. 6. 2014 at 09:20:33, Luke Nath wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:46:23 +0200
> > From: akozu...@redhat.com
> > To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org; yum-de...@lists.baseurl.org;
> > users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Save everybody some surprises in
> > Fedora 22!
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
On 6. 6. 2014 at 16:56:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 14:46 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
> > wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
> > have got recently
On 6. 6. 2014 at 09:33:03, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
> > wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
> > have got recently in Yum?
>
> Can we vote for features we want removed, like multilib? (Actually I g
On 13. 3. 2014 at 10:04:04, Mark Haney wrote:
> On 03/13/14 09:52, Tethys wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Jan Zelený
> >
> > wrote:
> >> The metadata are quite large and downloading them every single
> >> time is time consuming.
> >
>
On 13. 3. 2014 at 13:41:48, Tethys wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Mark Haney
wrote:
> > So, let me get this straight, DNF doesn't check the (online?) repo
> > metadata when I call 'sudo dnf update'? That's how I'm reading this.
> >
> > If that's true, why the devil not?
>
> At a gu
On 19. 2. 2014 at 12:57:29, Dan Irwin wrote:
> Hello Joe,
>
> Thanks for the tip. I had forgotten about package-cleanup. However, running
> that shows some more issues:
>
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading packages:
> Running transaction check
> ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
> libvir
On 9. 1. 2014 at 14:31:09, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:26:32 -0500
> "Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA" wrote:
>
> Apologies wrog link
>
> http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/01/02/dnf-update-and-yum-update-produce-differen
> t-output/
Just a note here: if you want the MD to be synced
On 2. 1. 2014 at 13:32:23, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Ales Kozumplik wrote:
> > On behalf of the DNF team I'd like to invite all the interested Fedora
> > users in trying out and testing DNF in Fedora 20. DNF is a tool that
> > aims to fully replace Yum by Fedora 22.
>
> Yum works perfectly well, in
On 2. 11. 2013 at 09:30:56, Les Howell wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I got a few messages during my latest yum update. They indicate that
> some files were not present, since it occurred during the cleanup phase
> I suspect it is not important, but thought I should check just in
> case...
>
> Her
On 29. 9. 2013 at 18:02:57, Özgür wrote:
> And why do hidden groups exist at all? I cannot see any point of hiding
> "Development Libraries". Is it very infrequently used? No. Is it
> dangerous? No. So what is the point?
My guess is that the group is not intended (for whatever reason) to be
insta
On 30. 8. 2013 at 18:18:54, poma wrote:
> On 30.08.2013 10:52, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:48:45 +0200
> >
> > Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> Yum only tells me the sites it has _failed_ to download from.
> >> Wouldn't it be nice if it also told us which sites _succeed_?
> >> I'd li
46 matches
Mail list logo
