Re: Is this proof that systemd is completely broken?

So then tell me where the heck have you have been for the past several weeks? All the time this user has been whining and crying over this 3 or so year old change that he can not comprehend.? On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jul 2014 21:01:35 -0400 > David

Re: Is this proof that systemd is completely broken?

It appears that the entire Linux world hates your guts so perhaps you might consider buying a Mac and using Mac OS X? At the very least might I suggest the you STFU? Since you appear to not be smart enough to deal with this. Gee. Are there no moderators here? On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Sam

Re: mailto links from Chrome w/Thunderbird

Does it work with the "mailto:"; there? On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Steven Stern < subscribed-li...@sterndata.com> wrote: > On 04/05/2013 08:42 AM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > On 04/04/13 20:36, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 04/05/13 09:19, Steven Stern wrote: > >>> It is. It's got to be somethin

Re: Proposal request for ideas on naming Fedora releases.

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Eric Christensen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The Fedora Board is soliciting ideas for how to name Fedora releases > from community members. Proposals should be sent to the Advisory > Board list[0][1] no later than 16:00 UTC on 25

Re: F15 : Flash not working on firefox 12

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Edik Landaveri wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:02:24PM -0400, David wrote: >> On 5/11/2012 8:55 PM, Edik Landaveri wrote: > >> You do understand that the reason Flash gets updates is to patch >> security holes and bugs? >> >> To go 'backwards' to solve a viewi

Re: Google Inc. Could Be Compliant to the Chinese Government in Beijing, People's Republic of China (PRC)

On 9/20/2010 8:35 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 08:04 +0800, "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) 张恩 > 鸣 of Singapore" wrote: >> Article: Google Warns of China Exit Over Hacking >> Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html >> >> I don't think it is that easy

Re: Wine and iexplore.exe

On 9/19/2010 6:53 PM, James McKenzie wrote: > On 9/18/10 5:54 PM, JD wrote: >> >> On 09/18/2010 05:48 PM, James McKenzie wrote: >> Yeah.. I decided to dump it. I uninstalled everything "wine". >> Not worth all the jumping through hoops to make it work right. > There is this saying, if you want t

Re: New install

On 9/18/2010 1:14 PM, JD wrote: > > > On 09/18/2010 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 16:05:11 +, >>JB wrote: >> Fedora doesn't have infinite resources. Not doing things to save resources >> is a good reason. >> >> There is a process by which people can support

Re: Thunderbird 3.1

On 6/20/2010 4:53 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 06/19/10 23:56, Genes MailLists wrote: >> On 06/19/2010 04:35 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> >> yes a little but there's a few 686 libs that need to be installed and >> it works fine thereafter. > > ... but not all addons run correctly, and some run not

Re: Evolution reply header

On 6/17/2010 2:30 PM, JD wrote: > > > On 06/17/2010 10:01 AM, David Boles was caught red-handed while writing:: >> On 6/17/2010 12:27 PM, JD wrote: >> >> >> >> For TB 3.0.4 >> >> Edit> Preferences> Advanced> Config Editor> S

Re: Evolution reply header

On 6/17/2010 12:27 PM, JD wrote: > > > On 06/17/2010 09:26 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 09:11 -0700, JD wrote: >> What does Firefox have to do with mail headers (even supposing the >>> OPs >>> question was actually about mail headers, wh

Re: Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

On 6/16/2010 7:22 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> >> Gene uses 64-bit Firefox, I think, and he was using the 64bit Flash. I >> gave him the link. Naively. The 32-bit Flash

Re: Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

On 6/16/2010 7:18 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > == > As I said, this is the one installed and linked. This listing is from > ~/Downloads, n

Re: Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

On 6/16/2010 5:50 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 17:22 -0400, David Boles wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote: >>>> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flas

Re: Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

On 6/16/2010 4:48 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:20 -0400, David Boles wrote: >> Since there is no longer a 64bit Flash plugin available you will have >> to use a 32bit browser. > > Not so. I use 64-bit Chromium and 32-bit Flash works with

Re: Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

On 6/16/2010 2:28 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 16 June 2010, David Boles wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote: >>>> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: >>>>

Re: Adobe releases 32-bit Flash update for Linux

On 6/16/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 16 June 2010, Steve Underwood wrote: >> On 06/16/2010 09:55 PM, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote: >> >> This is what they released last week, and its by far their buggiest >> effort to date. >> >> Steve >> > I believe this may be a newer build.

Re: Another funny update?

On 6/15/2010 7:18 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 5:05 PM, David Boles <mailto:dgbo...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > > On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > >> On Tue, J

Re: Another funny update?

On 6/15/2010 4:35 PM, Kevin Martin wrote: > On 06/15/2010 02:30 PM, mike cloaked wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> >> I used to use kmod-nvidia(-PAE) and what I used to do was: >> yum check-update >> >> Then if there was a kernel but no kmod update listed then

Re: Another funny update?

On 6/15/2010 4:25 PM, Marcel Rieux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Kevin Martin > wrote: > > > > Shouldn't there be a way for yum/packagekit to understand the > interdependencies when kmod packages are installed such that a new > ker

Re: Extract file from tar home/

On 6/7/2010 5:48 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote: > > I have /home/bobg/ tar'd to "bobg.tar.gz." Can I extract individual > files or directories without unzipping the entire 17 gigs? As a GUI function - I can't speak for KDE. With Gnome. Open the folder that contains the tar.gz. double click t

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/29/2010 1:40 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 01:29 PM, David Boles wrote: >> >> Hi Ed. Peace? >> > I, for one, was never at war. >> Perhaps a problem on my part. If so I stand corrected. >> > I thought I was clear in that it wasn't your

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/29/2010 12:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 11:49 AM, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/28/2010 11:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >>> On 05/29/2010 10:58 AM, David Boles wrote: >>> >>>> I have seen what Raul posted so far. He has not written

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/29/2010 12:01 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 23:38 -0400, David Boles wrote: >> You, as I recall, are one of the part time users that complained about >> the layout of the website. > > Your recollection is faulty. Could be. This crap thread

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 11:38 PM, Craig White wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 22:52 -0400, David Boles wrote: > >> Honest all I was hoping for was no more names and friends united for a >> common cause. > > I'm certain that calling people assholes doesn't convey that

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 11:36 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 10:58 AM, David Boles wrote: >> >> I have seen what Raul posted so far. He has not written anything to me >> about that. I respect him. If he had I would respect his wishes. >> > So, you read what Raul ha

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 11:29 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 22:31 -0400, David Boles wrote: >> And what you said was well said. And you did it WITHOUT attacking >> anyone! How refreshing! >> >> :-) << that smile means that I am smiling. >

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 10:43 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 10:20 AM, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/28/2010 9:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >>> On 05/29/2010 09:25 AM, David Boles wrote: >>> >>>> I apologize to all of the other users of this list for

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 10:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 09:56 AM, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/28/2010 9:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >>> On 05/29/2010 08:56 AM, David Boles wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/28/2010 8:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >&

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 10:21 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 19:10:55 -0700 > Mike Fedyk wrote: > >> So please count to 10, or maybe 20 and realize that there are many >> circles of people outside and within fedora that don't watch all other >> parts of the whole. It just wouldn't scale that w

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 10:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 05/29/2010 04:52 AM, David Boles wrote: >> SHUT UP! >> >> None of you was here when this was talked about? Since October? And now >> you want to bitch becasue the site does NOT fit YOUR needs. REALLY! >> >

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 9:45 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 09:25 AM, David Boles wrote: >> >> I apologize to all of the other users of this list for my language, >> before and now, but... you people are assholes! >> > I hope you do realize that that is a personal

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 10:10 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/28/2010 4:32 PM, Bill Crawford wrote: >>> On 28 May 2010 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:48 +0100, Bill Crawford wrote: >

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 9:35 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 08:56 AM, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/28/2010 8:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: >> >> >> That makes two. You also deserve congratulations for doing your part. >> That makes you part 'two' for two. >

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 8:17 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 19:22 -0400, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/28/2010 4:32 PM, Bill Crawford wrote: >>> On 28 May 2010 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:48 +0100, Bill C

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 7:56 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Friday 28 May 2010 04:22 PM, David Boles wrote: >> Bittorent sucks. Period. >> > > I am replying just to disagree with this part of your email. > >> A question. Bittorent exists because you are supposed to SHARE. Did YOU?

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 8:05 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 05/29/2010 07:56 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: >> On Friday 28 May 2010 04:22 PM, David Boles wrote: >> >>> Bittorent sucks. Period. >>> >>> >> I am replying just to disagree with this part of your

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/28/2010 4:32 PM, Bill Crawford wrote: > On 28 May 2010 18:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 17:48 +0100, Bill Crawford wrote: >> >> Well, we aren't talking about desktop vs netbook vs server but I guess >> it's immaterial. > > Uh, good point. Sorry. More like Ubuntu vs

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/26/2010 4:22 PM, Alan Evans wrote: > 2010/5/26 Máirín Duffy : >> The links you referenced were removed quite explicitly in the design. >> The assumption was that if someone understands how to use bittorrent, >> jigdo, and mirror lists, they are more than capable of making use of a >> search en

Re: Regarding Get Fedora page

On 5/26/2010 4:31 PM, Máirín Duffy wrote: Máirín > Make a decision - contribute, or don't contribute. If you're going to > contribute, then follow the design and development of the distro. If > you're not going to contribute, don't be rude to those who did. No one > is asking you to guess, I am

Re: Finding FC 13 CD isos

On 5/25/2010 5:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > On 05/25/2010 05:25 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote: >> Go to http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/. > > A non-torrent site? http://mirrors.reflected.net/fedora/linux/releases/13/Fedora -- David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: Any difference between F13 RC3 and Final?

On 5/25/2010 1:37 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I have been using the Deltaisos from Andre to keep updating my F13 > x86_64 install DVD but I do not see one for RC3->Final. Are they the > same? If I understood correctly. No. There are however some updates/fixes. The number depends on what you have

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

On 5/13/2010 12:07 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, David Boles wrote: >> On 5/13/2010 11:31 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> >> >> I just have to ask. Why would running Openoffice on Linux impress a >> Windows user enough to convince them to switch to

Re: OpenOffice Should Be Included On Version 13 LiveCD...

On 5/13/2010 11:31 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Tom H wrote: > >> True, but if a Linux distribution wants to attract Windows and OSX >> desktop users (_IF_), OO is an essential package because it is what >> those users expect, an integrated office application suite that

Re: run Fedora 12 (64bit) on Sun Virtual Box issue

On 5/6/2010 9:54 PM, Michael wrote: > I made some progress, but was stuck in the Guest Additions installation. > > Following was what I did: > 1. in console mode as root. > > 2. > dhclient eth0 > *this seems enabling the network adapter, since my VM hasn't connected > to Internet previously.