On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> The Fedora Bugzilla is at http://bugzilla.redhat.com. You can create
>> an account there and then report your bug (and patch) against the
>> logrotate package. If it needs to be reported upstream, the package
>>
t would be more suitable for this patch? Any advice would
be appreciated.
sincerely,
Colin McCabe
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 18:15 -0700, Colin McCabe wrote:
>> This patch fixes a buffer overflow in logrotate. The diff was
This patch fixes a buffer overflow in logrotate. The diff was done
against trunk on http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/logrotate/
Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this. I didn't see a mailing
list mentioned on the project page at
https://fedorahosted.org/logrotate/
Fixed version with proper
This patch fixes a buffer overflow in logrotate. The diff was done
against trunk on http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/logrotate/
Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this. I didn't see a mailing
list mentioned on the project page at
https://fedorahosted.org/logrotate/
Index: config.c
==
nd 'g++'? [N/y]
[cmccabe@highcastle ceph]$ echo $?
0
cheers,
Colin McCabe
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines