On 09/02/2013 04:42 PM, Bill Oliver wrote:
> My wife turned to me and said, "If I were the bad guy, I'd just have the
> computer delete everything if someone entered the boat name, or at least
> send me a text. The boat was an obvious guess, and I would never
> accidentally type it in."
This is p
On 08/14/2013 04:53 PM, Alan Evans wrote:
> Now I do remember years back that there was some sort of wrapper I could
> execute
> old programs in that would allow them to work with the latest (at the time)
> sound architecture. But I don't remember what it was called. And in any case,
> it
> pr
On 07/17/2013 04:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Again, nope, at least for common log files. logrotate copies the
> current ownership/permissions to the new files, unless otherwise
> configured (and only a few files have that set in the default config;
> they probably shouldn't either).
*if the conf
On 07/17/2013 03:47 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:29:04AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Timothy Murphy said:
>>> Will it cause any problems if I change the permissions on these files?
>>
>> Nope, been doing it for years.
>
> I thought changing the permission
On 07/17/2013 12:50 PM, Roger wrote:
> I would like to know too.
> I get it in my Rails4 development sites. It is always empty but
> frequently triggers a SELinux denial.
> Roger
Chrom{e,ium} according to various hits for 'libpeerconnection.log' on
google:
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=libpee
On 06/18/2013 04:37 AM, lee wrote:
What does that mean? When I look at [2], all it does seems to do is to
allow to know when power sources are added or removed --- which is
something that never happens. I don't have any hot pluggable PSUs.
It's an abstraction for finding the power devices con
On 05/08/2013 05:44 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Tony Su wrote:
In the "old days" edits were made directly to the appropriate file
/proc/net/ipv4/...
Are you looking for /proc/sys/net/ip4? AFAICT /proc/net hasn't
existed since everyone switched over to the 2.
On 04/25/2013 12:31 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/24/2013 04:11 PM, Roger wrote:
Continuing to educate the masses is the only way that people will learn
the real meaning.
As you can see here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geezer, the original
meaning of the term Geezer, as still used in the UK, is
On 04/24/2013 03:42 AM, Richard Vickery wrote:
Of course, the media are infamous for abusing scientific terms, such as
calling the Higgs boson the god particle - a term scientists loathe - so
I out not lose too much sleep over it.
Actually the scientists (inc. prof. Higgs) are not so happy with
On 03/15/2013 04:28 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
I have noticed lately on my F18 installation that this file:
C:\nppdf32Log\debuglog.txt
Ask Ubuntu :)
http://askubuntu.com/questions/144408/what-is-the-file-c-nppdf32log-debuglog-txt
keeps popping up in my HOME.
Anybody know the explanation or
On 03/14/2013 06:27 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
Interesting, I'll have a look. But the downside you mention is exactly
the one I want to avoid. Having to handle a mapping between
distributions and packaging systems. See the other message I just
posted...
I think that's the crux of this prob
On 03/14/2013 04:43 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:09:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
presence of /var/lib/rpm
/etc/os-release
/etc/redhat-release
And perhaps a run-time check, such as an RPM based query, which would
only work if the RPM database is filled with details about
On 03/11/2013 01:28 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Quoting lun, 11 mar 2013 Reindl Harald :
Am 11.03.2013 14:18, schrieb Patrick Dupre:
I made a BIG mistake,
I removed /var/lib.
the machine is done
How can I reinstall it?
what do you imagine to "reinstall"
no way - /var/lib contains as examp
On 02/06/2013 06:33 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
Should I be root to be
able to create/remove files/folder in my external hd??
No. Create a scratch dir on the hd (as root) and do
chmod 1777
This will create a directory that any user can write to.
Or you could chown the root directory of the ex
On 02/06/2013 11:04 AM, Jean Jacques wrote:
Has any one encountered the problem that the screen cannot back from
lock? The new lock screen does not unlock after the password has been
entered.
I've seen similar behaviour in a few situations: when the load on the
box is extremely high it may
On 01/31/2013 09:53 AM, Raf Roger wrote:
i'm looking for a good system monitoring for fedora 18.
i found something about standard applet package called
"gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet rpm"
I quite like this one and used it quite a bit.
but i was think is the one displayed on the
On 01/29/2013 04:45 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
If the Fedora team saw this as a problem, they would arrange to have
rpmfusion keep drivers available for the obsolete kernels in the media
as well as the current kernels you get with upgrade. At least for
Broadcom and Ralink (net) and Radeon and Nvidi
On 01/28/2013 04:49 PM, JOYCE POLZIN wrote:
Autofs in F18 won't work without it.
Presumably you meant NTLMv2 (NT LAN Manager Version 2, aka NTLM2).
It's an ancient Microsoft authentication protocol used with Windows file
and print sharing and other Windows network services.
Sharing more det
On 01/15/2013 05:29 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
Gentle People:
My suggestion: Use Fedora 14 and immediately load all updates.
Results from my testing:
Fedora 17 x64 - Not usable way to many bugs.
Not sure what this has to do with F18 install methods but I'm using F17
x86
On 01/15/2013 11:57 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
http://fpaste.org/jijW/ ctrl-f : "this line"
does this mean my board can take 16gb ram?
Their website says 8gb
http://www.msi.com/product/mb/P35-Platinum.html#/?div=Basic
It means your memory controller has enough pins to drive 16GiB of
memory. Un
On 01/09/2013 06:18 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I would try this on something you can afford to lose... I just don't see
any more info on this than you did before asking. I am curious, since I
Changing hash_alg on an existing file system sets the default hash
algorithm for newly created directori
On 28/11/12 18:52, Rick Stevens wrote:
> I reiterate:
>
> 1. Install the kernel source RPM.
>
> 2. Navigate to your ~/rpmbuild/SPECS directory.
>
> 3. Do "rpmbuild -bp --target=x86_64 kernel.spec" or
> "rpmbuild -bp --target=i686 kernel.spec" depending on your
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/28/2012 05:07 PM, JD wrote:
> The main point is that the build takes too darned long. On my
> unicore cpu, it takes almost 2 days. Building bazillions of useless
> modules is a great waste of time and machine.
If you want to change the set of mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/26/2012 12:49 PM, Ian Chapman wrote:
> On 26/10/12 19:44, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> How can I manage such an issue?
>>
>>
>> WARNING: Duplicate VG name VolGrpSys0:
>> s4LnbI-FRjU-fsPt-2W3d-XIIL-LT7o-uPsVfo (created here) takes
>> p
On 10/17/2012 12:06 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 10/16/2012 02:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
>> Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
>> can't see their commands.
>> Can I disable the command "unset history"?
>> If it is not possible, what can I do?
>>
>> Thanks in
On 10/16/2012 05:21 PM, Jack Craig wrote:
> Thx! I knew there had to be a solution, ...
I'm also a big fan of ps ax --forest - it retains the ps fields while
still giving you an asciigram of the process tree:
$ ps ax --forest
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
2 ?S 0:00 [kthreadd
On 10/16/2012 07:52 AM, Tiziana Manfroni wrote:
> Hi, I have some users that delete .history file (in tcsh shell), so I
> can't see their commands.
> Can I disable the command "unset history"?
> If it is not possible, what can I do?
You can't really prevent a user from altering their environment
On 10/15/2012 03:46 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Ian Pilcher wrote:
>> I'm sure that this information is somewhere on the Fedora Wiki,
>> but my search-fu apparently isn't up to the task of finding it.
>>
>> What are the plans for LVM and/or software RAID support?
>>
>> Currently (F18 Beta TC2), it
On 09/18/2012 05:37 AM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> namely ones that don't even functionsome title are: "Tetravex" -
> Some sort of mutated Sudoku game, "Nibbles" some form of worm game and a
> few others. I have tried going to the "Add / Remove Software" module but
> it doesn't even find
On 09/14/2012 02:57 PM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> Gimp and "single window interface"? What Fedora are you actually on??
> I'm on a fully updated F17, and I don't have a single window interface
> in Gimp (wish I had)..
F17 as I've said more than once.
Look in the Windows menu perhaps? It should be the
On 09/14/2012 01:41 PM, Claude Jones wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 06:26 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> What is it that you don't like in the new GIMP? For me the single window
>> interface is far preferable to the old lets-hunt-around-the-workspace
>> mode and it's opt
On 09/14/2012 11:34 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> On 14 September 2012 11:26, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> On 09/13/2012 08:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>
>>> And, while I'm at it, when did it stop
>>> being The GIMP[2]?
>>
>> I don't recall the splash
On 09/13/2012 08:57 PM, Fedora User wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:41 -0400, Fedora User wrote:
>> People must have too much time on their hands. Add some features; maybe
>> clean up some code. But why on earth make major UI changes to a program
>> that consistently did exactly what it was suppo
On 09/13/2012 08:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 09/13/2012 12:41 PM, Fedora User wrote:
>> People must have too much time on their hands. Add some features; maybe
>> clean up some code. But why on earth make major UI changes to a program
>> that consistently did exactly what it was supposed to do exac
On 09/10/2012 01:31 PM, Dave Ulrick wrote:
> Is there any possible way I could configure ABRT to stop nagging me about
> this particular bug? Note this "bug" is really just a WARN()/assertion in
> a kernel module (i915). Other than the annoyance caused by the frequent
> bug reports, it causes no
On 08/31/2012 01:41 PM, NOSpaze wrote:
> But if I use nc and do...
>
> # nc 127.0.0.1 5038 << EOF
> > Action: Login
> > ActionID: 1
> > Username: youwanna
> > Secret: uwanna
> >
> > EOF
> Asterisk Call Manager/1.0
Does the behaviour
On 08/19/2012 08:57 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> My sister uses Linux, and has Thunderbird installed. However, her
> primary email address is at gmail. She'd like to be able to click on
> mailto: links and have gmail come up instead of Thunderbird. AFAICT,
> there's no obvious way to do it. Does an
On 08/05/2012 03:30 AM, Javier Perez wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there any list of Cargo cult sysadmin practices for Fedora?
A perennial favourite:
* disable, remove and BURN WITH FIRE pulseaudio at the first sign of any
sound playback trouble. It doesn't matter if it caused it. It must be
purged and pun
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 05:55 -0700, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:44:24AM +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 20:13 -0700, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > That's not a disk problem. That's the disk failing to remount itself
>
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:05 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I find the output of lspci a bit odd. I thought that it would indicate the
> card type. Mine, for example, is ...
>
> 1:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G92 [GeForce GT 230]
> (rev a2)
Getting numeric output indicates t
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 18:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 06:29 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > Do you have a card reader device?
>
> Yes And that is sde.
I would guess it's a multi-card reader device and those additional SCSI
device nodes correspond to em
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 18:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 06:16 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > In this case a suggestion that for whatever reason the kernel hasn't
> > properly dealt with the removal of the device that had been assigned to
> > sdd (it presumably
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 18:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 05:59 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 17:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 07/30/2012 04:44 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> >>> What state is the device in following a resume?
>
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 12:09 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 30/07/12 11:51, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 11:42 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> >> On 30/07/12 10:44, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> >>> What state is the device in following a resume?
>
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 10:50 +0100, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> Interesting, I've never come across such a beast. Could you supply a URL
> to one that you'd recommend as I'd be fascinated to check one out?
Embedded systems may use considerably less GNU bits than we're used to
in a general purpose distribu
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 06:48 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > Do you see that happen a lot?
>
> Do you mean the error, or the sharing of scripts?
The error: it's an abnormal condition so if you are seeing that,
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 17:47 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 04:44 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > What state is the device in following a resume?
> > (/sys/block/sd*/device/state).
>
> I am not so sure that is a "good" indication of anything. I have 2 driv
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 11:42 +0200, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> On 30/07/12 10:44, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > What state is the device in following a resume?
> > (/sys/block/sd*/device/state).
>
> What is that? I don't see anything near this path on my system. You probably
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 06:29 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:13 AM, wrote:
> > This is very common. In fact, I wrote a script
> > (in Gentoo) to unmount external drives before a suspend operation, so that
> > the numbering of disks in /dev don't become littered with 'zom
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 20:13 -0700, ny6...@gmail.com wrote:
> That's not a disk problem. That's the disk failing to remount itself
> properly after the suspend. This is very common. In fact, I wrote a script
> (in Gentoo) to unmount external drives before a suspend operation, so that
> the numbering
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:50 +0300, Veli-Pekka Kestilä wrote:
> On 28.7.2012 15:07, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > My idea what to repair the installation from another installation.
> > So, I mounted the defectuous installation, and I did a chroot to it.
> > It works except that I have an error message:
>
Attempting to install the "put windows" extension for gnome3:
https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/39/put-windows/
I get the "Download and install 'Put Window' from extensions.gnome.org?"
dialog and OK it and the extension apparently fails to install
somewhere.
Couldn't find anything obvious (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/2012 03:29 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Bryn,
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 03:17:01PM +0100, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>>
>> That would normally also be reflected to some extent in CPU usage
>> and process activity
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/12/2012 02:36 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 06:00 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: rottled down and are at
> about 1%.
>>
>> So my question is since CPU usage is already so low, what could
>> be driving up the system load? This is bugging me sinc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2012 02:31 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
> On 10.07.2012 11:26, Dave Cross wrote:
>> On 10 July 2012 10:15, Mateusz Marzantowicz
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible that broken kernel which won't boot or cause any
>>> other serious problems is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2012 12:52 PM, Gergely Buday wrote:
> Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04b0:031d Nikon Corp. [gergoe@oldship
> regio_et_religio]$ lsusb -vs 001:004
>
> Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType
> 4 bInterfaceNumber0 bAlter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2012 12:18 PM, Gergely Buday wrote:
> fedora did not automount my camera. So I tried lsusb, which has
> found it, but even in verbose mode it did not tell me any data that
> can be fed to mount. How can I mount then my camera?
>
> Bus 001 Dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2012 05:35 PM, Jim wrote:
> Thanks Rick I have done all that you have said but now I'm running
> into read-only file systems, what command would I use to change the
> ro to rw on external hard drive sdb1 ?
>
Since the original dd command:
d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2012 05:35 PM, Jim wrote:
> Thanks Rick I have done all that you have said but now I'm running
> into read-only file systems, what command would I use to change the
> ro to rw on external hard drive sdb1 ?
>
It was probably still mounted fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2012 03:11 PM, Jim wrote:
> I run dd if=/dev/sda2 of=/dev/sdb1 to copy, supposely a 26gb
> image to sdb1 but i do not see a image on sdb1 .
>
> Confused ???
That writes a block-for-block image of the content of sda2 to the
device sdb1. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2012 05:43 PM, Greg Woods wrote:
> What ajax seems to be saying is that it is not realistic to
> include every possible choice in a given distribution. I agree.
> There are desktop environments available for Linux that are not
> shipped with F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2012 03:09 PM, David wrote:
> On 6/20/2012 9:53 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
>> Since I am responsible for initiating the attacks on Fedora for
>> using Gnome 3, I feel I should clarify with some kind of apology.
>> I did not say nor do I mean tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/2012 04:03 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
Use an offset, e.g.
# mount -o loop,offset=4
>>>
>>> Thanks, I should have thought of that. Alas, it didn't work.
>>>
>>> # mount -o loop,offset=4 -t vfat myusb_sdb.dd /media/desktop/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/06/2012 04:19 AM, Doug Wyatt wrote:
> I have a 2TB HD with 1463 pending bad blocks, 0 reallocated so
> far. All the data has been moved to another HD, the problem HD
> unmounted. Full SMART scan verified the pending bad blocks.
>
> However, I ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 10:06 PM, Thibault Nélis wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 04:45 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> Or is the ext4 code able to mount ext3 now (I didn't think so)?
>
> I'm pretty sure it is fully backward compatible yes, eve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 04:24 PM, Lutz Griesbach wrote:
> as you described but the parse error still appears.
>
> [root@fed17-2 drbd.d]# drbdadm create-md cos62 drbd.d/cos62.res:8:
> Parse error: '[' expected, but got ';' (TK 59)
>
> Also i am not sure, if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 03:55 PM, Lutz Griesbach wrote:
> Hi there
>
> Fedora17 with drbd 8.3.11 an i am trying to create a resource with
> external meta-disk:
>
> resource cos62 { #meta-disk internal; meta-disk
> /dev/vg_drbd/lv-cos62-drbd-meta;
- From the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 01:14 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Aside from some clear performance wins for not-that-uncommon
>> workloads (deleting lots of large files, storing large images
>> etc) there's the fact that most of the attention upstream these
>> days is go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 12:18 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Who gets to make a call what is "trusted", and what even "trusted"
> means.
Slightly off-topic but a favourite Ken Thomson talk/paper of mine that
is very relevant to the discussion of "trust" in softwa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 12:15 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:59:42 +0100 "Bryn M. Reeves"
> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 06/01/2012 04:56 AM, JD wrote:
>>> FWI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2012 04:56 AM, JD wrote:
> FWIW, perhaps - just perhaps - this is an attempt by MS and redhat
> (and perhaps others like Oracle), to try an convince government
> customers that a system with a signed bootloader and kernel and
> modules, provi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 06:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 03:31 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> That will generally speaking exceed their profit margin on the
>> board by quite a bit so will make them very keen to document it
>> clearly for future users.
>
> Dem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 04:01 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
>
>> I have already an external disk formatted with ext3, but for
>> safety reasons I am now wanting to have two external disks with
>> the same backups. When I formatted the first external disk, I did
>> not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 03:58 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
> That's a good point. I guess now would be a good time to mention
> that a volume snapshot != backup (see below), however, I've heard
> of snapshots sometimes being used to create a "still" or
> "point-in-tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 02:35 PM, Jeff Gipson wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:15:58PM +0100, Paul Smith wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have got a new external hard disk, which I would like to use as
>> a mirror of my home directory (for backup purpose). What f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 12:15 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> I have got a new external hard disk, which I would like to use as
> a mirror of my home directory (for backup purpose). What format for
> the external disk filesystem do you recommend? And what the proper
> c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/31/2012 07:04 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 08:01 PM, Tim wrote:
>> On the one hand, it says calls do not pass through it (it just
>> organises the two parties to connect to each other). And, on the
>> other hand, it talks about not exposi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2012 05:31 PM, jdow wrote:
> It's been covered as a problem in that it is not a problem - at
> least
Who said it was a problem? It's just how it works..
> on the RHEL trees. SL2 has this sequence of links: $ ll
> /usr/sbin/sendmail lrwxrwxrw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2012 05:19 PM, Jim wrote:
> I'm sorry that I may have posted this to the wrong location, but
> the Linux world has got to see this.
If it's the end of the world as we know it I feel fine. :-)
> Won't Microsoft have a run in, with the GPL-3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2012 04:06 PM, jdow wrote:
> On 2012/05/30 07:51, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>
>> On 05/30/2012 03:23 PM, sergiocmailbox-fedoraus...@yahoo.com.br
>> wrote:
>>> ..and I also figured it's required for some basic pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2012 03:23 PM, sergiocmailbox-fedoraus...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
> ..and I also figured it's required for some basic packages, so I'll
> just disable its service. Thanks.
I think things should depend on "MTA" or "smtpdaemon" rather than
sendmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2012 07:50 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> # udevadm monitor monitor will print the received events for: UDEV
> - the event which udev sends out after rule processing KERNEL - the
> kernel uevent <> KERNEL[183.649491] change
> /devices/pci:00/000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2012 05:15 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 04:15 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
>> I have never used udevadm before. If I have read the man page
>> correctly, all I need to do is to initiate "udevadm monitor" and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2012 04:15 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> I have never used udevadm before. If I have read the man page
> correctly, all I need to do is to initiate "udevadm monitor" and
> then plug in the card, is that right?
Yes - just run the command as root an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2012 03:46 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root
> hub Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2012 03:26 PM, Arthur Dent wrote:
> So then I looked at lspci (see below). I may be wrong but I can't
> see anything which might be a card reader listed there. It's as if
> I don't actually have a card reader.
Most internal card readers are U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/27/2012 09:04 PM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 12:45:45 PM, Phil Dobbin wrote: I went around that
> tree a few months back, and as far as I could discover there is no
> was to resize a partition. The parted documentation seemed to imply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/09/2012 03:33 PM, JD wrote:
> May 8 22:07:44 localhost pulseaudio[31173]: bluetooth-util.c:
> Error from ListAdapters reply: org.freedesktop.systemd1.LoadFailed
> May 8 22:07:44 localhost pulseaudio[31173]: module-ladspa-sink.c:
> Master sink
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/2012 09:20 PM, Hal wrote:
> On 4/16/2012 2:37 PM, jdow wrote:
>> On 2012/04/16 07:28, fred smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:04:45AM +0100, Bryn M. Reeves
>>> wrote:
>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/2012 08:36 AM, Hal wrote:
> Roger had the answer. The Romans used stale human URINE(Uric Acid)
> to was their togas and other things. No movies my friend.
More likely they were using stale urine for its high ammonia content.
Dried-on uric aci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/2012 06:40 PM, jdow wrote:
> It might help if you washed them once and awhile.
>
> {O.O} (You should know by not I lurk here and NO good
> straight-line is safe.)
Washing tends to make them fall apart faster, not slower (intense
mechanical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/2012 02:47 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 03:17 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> with one single command you can protect processes from get
>> killed i started to run this every 15 minutes to make sure it is
>> also active after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/2012 11:30 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> nono a physical wool felt hat I can put on my head to keep warm.
>
> Probably you have to buy a subscription to a hat nowdays ;-)
>
> Alan
I would gladly buy clothes by subscription if it was a good service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/2012 10:19 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/04/12 10:08, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>> Red Hat Linux 10.3
>>
>> Bryn.
>>
>
> "The Unnamed One"
>
>
Well, we can't call it "Yarrow&quo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 07:21 PM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:07:28PM -0400, nu...@gmx.com wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:13:33PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
I think Fedora 18 should take a radical approach to code
na
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/2012 08:10 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Tim
> wrote: s/some/a lot of/
>
> if you set it up right.
It can still do a fair amount of nasty stuff.
> "xhost local:; sudo -u " does pretty well
> with current applicatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2012 04:13 AM, Vaclav Mocek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a cloned GCC git repository, on PC with 1.5GB of RAM and 3GB
> swap.
>
> When I run "$git gc --aggressive", I will get after few hours an
> error:
>
> $ git gc --aggressive Counting ob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2012 12:12 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote:
> That is not optimization, that is interface design. The two are
> entirely different. The "premature optimization" bit is about
> choosing implementation clarity (expression) at the expense of
> execution speed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/23/2012 07:38 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> "systemctl restart httpd.service" is a joke compared with "service
> httpd restart" - a msart developer would have made .service as
> default-fallback and only "httpd.socket" as example would need full
> q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/22/2012 10:30 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote:
> Bryn, thanks for info. http://www.freedesktop.org/ seems totally
> inaccessible yet, what is suspicious too. I will waiting when this
> site will be up.
It's working fine here (I get the redirect to
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
