On Sun, 2020-08-09 at 20:49 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 8/9/20 8:02 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Fedora 32 (Workstation Edition)
> > Kernel 5.7.12-200.fc32.x86_64 on an x86_64 (tty3)
> > mull login: braden
> > Password:
> > Last l
on this machine via autofs.
$ cat /etc/auto.master.d/home.autofs
/home/etc/auto.home
$ cat /etc/auto.home
*-fstype=nfs4hinge:/endoframe-store/home/&
--
Braden McDaniel
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedorapr
On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 10:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-07-15 22:20, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > I'd like to support a CentOS 7 client from a Fedora 32 NFS4 server.
> > Other Fedora 32 clients can mount the volume just fine using:
> >
> >$ mount -t nf
it of configuration I can do on the client and/or server
to make this work, short of allowing fallback to pre-4 NFS versions?
--
Braden McDaniel
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to use
On 2020-07-02 19:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/2/20 2:52 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
For the record, *I* didn’t add “nomodeset” to the kernel command line;
the Fedora install did that. Maybe you get that when installing with
the “basic graphics” installer?
Yes.
…And it turns out that though
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 7:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 7/2/20 2:52 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> For the record, *I* didn’t add “nomodeset” to the kernel command line; the
>> Fedora install did that. Maybe you get that when installing with the “basic
>> graphics”
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 1:55 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:14 PM Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
> # cat /proc/cmdline
> BOOT_IMAGE=(hd1,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.7.6-201.fc32.x86_64
> root=UUID=cbcfb536-a8c8-4f79-8efd-60bec46d8a39 ro
> resume=UUID=9c3b9288-3be
that and install it; but that did not seem to improve my situation.
--
Braden McDaniel
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fe
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 2:09 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 7/1/20 10:44 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>>> $ lspci -k | grep -EA3 'VGA|3D|Display'
>>> 09:00.0 **VGA** compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>>> [AMD/ATI] Navi 10 [Rade
deon driver; and
when that fails, I get the generic framebuffer fallback.
Any suggestions for next steps to take?
--
Braden McDaniel
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fed
his system was upgraded from F28 to F29 via "dnf system-upgrade",
FWIW. (Graphical upgrade refused to work.)
Am I misunderstanding what "dnf mark install" does?
--
Braden McDaniel
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproj
This machine has a single user account and that account does not use a
password. In this scenario, there is no “Sign In” button.
Is the widget you’re referring to positioned elsewhere in this use case?
--
Braden McDaniel
___
users mail
ng the line “WaylandEnable=false” in /etc/gdm/custom.conf had no
impact on either problem.
And while it seems entirely possible to me that the touchpad issue is related
to Wayland, that seems less likely for the problem rebooting.
--
Braden McDaniel
__
use Wayland from the outset?
I will try X.org to see if that improves the situation; but, unless an F26
update changed things to use Wayland, I don’t see how that gets closer to
isolating the problem (and which component(s) has(have) regressed).
--
Braden McDaniel
_
, both problems persist.
I would be happy to file bugs for these issues; but I am uncertain what
component they should be filed against. Please advise.
--
Braden McDaniel
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 17:52 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 05:24 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 31 Mar 2016 00:52, "Braden McDaniel" > <mailto:bra...@endoframe.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at
On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 13:21 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 03/30/2016 12:06 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > I have a fresh, updated install of Fedora 23 Server. After
> > installation, I installed the "Basic Desktop" group. Now, when I try to
> > r
solve this? Could this be related to
the fact that my home directories are NFS mounted? (I have set the
use_nfs_home_dirs SELinux setting to "on".)
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedor
On 2014-12-17 09:37, fedora wrote:
selinux?
It's set to "permissive" on the F21 (server) box; shouldn't that be
sufficient? Or do I need to disable it completely to make sure it isn't
interfering?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproj
net for
krbtgt/endoframe@endoframe.net
Where should I be looking?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/c
problem be resolved as simply as telling abrt not to make a
copy? I'd be fine with just having the core files in /var/spool/abrt.
Otherwise, I imagine I'd like them somewhere named /var/users/$USER/dump
(or similar). How do I do that and continue to play nicely with abrt?
--
Braden
lobal]
security = ADS
realm = ENDOFRAME.NET
kerberos method = secrets and system keytab
encrypt passwords = yes
I added the keytab as follows:
kadmin: ktadd -e rc4-hmac:normal cifs/rail.endoframe.net
Any suggestions?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing
On Mar 15, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Brian Millett wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:35:10 -0400
> Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
>> root root 10485760 Mar 15 15:20 log.02
>
> Fix this and all other files to be ldap:ldap
Success!
That file was owned by root the first time I
Quoting Brian Millett :
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:14:40 + (UTC)
Braden McDaniel wrote:
Brian Millett gmail.com> writes:
[snip]
> what you want to do is to 'recover' the db, so in /var/lib/ldap, do
>
> db_recover
>
> then make sure that all files are owned lda
Brian Millett gmail.com> writes:
[snip]
> what you want to do is to 'recover' the db, so in /var/lib/ldap, do
>
> db_recover
>
> then make sure that all files are owned ldap:ldap
Hm... When I do that, I get:
# db_recover
db_recover: BDB1538 Program version 5.3 doesn't match environment
db_upgrade: BDB1538 Program version 5.3 doesn't match environment version 5.2
db_upgrade: DB_ENV->open: BDB0091 DB_VERSION_MISMATCH: Database
environment version mismatch
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail:
<http://endoframe.com>Jabber:
But, why
should this be required for NFS4? Automounting in Fedora 16 clients
certainly doesn't require it.
I've filed bug 845313, which hopefully will yield a definitive answer.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or c
On 4/19/12 9:16 AM, Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:37 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 06:09 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 22:03 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Can system-config-users be made to use ldapi (i.e., a socket connection
to an LDAP
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 08:27 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
[snip]
> Yes, It certainly looks like we should allow sambagui_t to access the ldap
> server without turning on the boolean.
Filed bug 813974: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813974
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users m
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 06:09 -0700, Craig White wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 22:03 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Can system-config-users be made to use ldapi (i.e., a socket connection
> > to an LDAP server)?
> >
> > According to "man 5 libuser.conf"
bagui_t urandom_device_t:chr_file open;
audit2allow -R
#= sambagui_t ==
# This avc can be allowed using one of the these booleans:
# authlogin_nsswitch_use_ldap, global_ssp
allow sambagui_t urandom_devic
, as I understand it).
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
do with IPv6 support; but I'm not sure whether I need
to enable IPv6 support somewhere, disable IPv6 support somewhere, or
where I should be doing either of those things.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:31 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 01:06 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 22:55 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
[snip]
> >> Anyways do you still believe you are having SELinux issues?
> >
> > Since I haven
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 22:55 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 08:47 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
[snip]
> > I am using Kerberos for authentication; but I'm using LDAP for user
> > information.
> >
> > (Though I get the impression that login is
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 16:10 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 10:27 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 17:27 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:37:45PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-04-11
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 17:27 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:37:45PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 15:25 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > > Are you booted with SELinux in permissive mode of disabled?
> >
> &g
arch -m avc
That's long; I'll attach it.
--
Braden McDaniel
ausearch-output.txt.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/u
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:45 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 12:01 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > I have a Fedora 16 box where something seems to have gone sideways with
> > SELinux. I am unable to log into the box with SELinux enabled. I see
> > messages in /
imeout)
DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ChildExited: Launch
helper exited with unknown return code 3
Any idea what happened here and how I might actually fix it?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription optio
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 19:49 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > I've had an rpm upgrade from Fedora 15 tio 16 go slightly sideways and I've
> > wound up with a grub prompt upon boot. I found
> > <htt
e.
Do I need a Live CD to recover at this point?
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail:
<http://endoframe.com>Jabber:
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
Quoting Ed Greshko :
On 03/27/2012 05:12 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Quoting Ed Greshko :
What do you get when from "netstat -nap | grep 143"?
# netstat -nap | grep 143
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:143 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 1055/dovecot
tcp0
LISTEN 1055/dovecot
[and some irrelevant stuff that happened to have "143" in it]
Assuming this confirms your suspicion, what do I need to do to fix it?
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail:
<http://endoframe.com>Jabber:
-
-0500; 13 years and 0 months ago
CGroup: name=systemd:/system/ip6tables.service
? yet I still get "connection refused" as above.
If not the firewall, what's the culprit here?
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail:
<http://endoframe.com>
sclient to work this way?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
: [slappasswd output]
However, I haven't had any luck using this password:
# ldapadd -x -D "cn=Manager,dc=endoframe,dc=net" -W -f Manager.ldif
Enter LDAP Password:
ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49)
Is there some other way I should be specifying the passwor
core_pattern contains a stale value, consider
resetting it to 'core'
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern just contains:
|/usr/libexec/abrt-hook-ccpp /var/cache/abrt %p %s %u %c
As I'm not able to edit this file, I'm not entirely clear on what
"resetting it to 'core
our" does not.
Evolution, notably, does *not* exhibit the problem.
Is anyone else seeing this? What package should a bug like this get
filed against?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedo
49 matches
Mail list logo