> On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> >>> OK,
> >>>
> >>> Now it is working with
> >>> Kernel IP routing table
> >>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> >>> Iface
> >>> 0.0.0.0
On 6/16/25 10:43 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Mon, 2025-06-16 at 09:55 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
What format do you prfefer?
Re: SOLVED - waterfox rpms?
SOLVED Re: - waterfox rpms?
Re: waterfox rpms? = SOLVED
Or just anywhere?
Don't type things in front of RE: you ge
On Mon, 2025-06-16 at 09:55 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> What format do you prfefer?
>
> Re: SOLVED - waterfox rpms?
> SOLVED Re: - waterfox rpms?
> Re: waterfox rpms? = SOLVED
>
> Or just anywhere?
Don't type things in front of RE: you get weird behaviour with some
mail cl
On 6/16/25 7:37 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Although the network manager is "suppose" to do this
(or something similar), I discovered the following
corrected the problem:
"#" means as "root"
# systemctl restart NetworkManager.service
If you run it as a user, systemctl will promp
On 6/16/25 3:24 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.1
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
enp0s20f0u11
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1
I saw RedHat with RHEL8 cut off hardware that first release was just 7
years earlier(2012) than RHEL8's release(2019) (so some of the
hardware was only 4-5 years old).
I always suspected it was the OEM (the board was a version of raid
card only used in their hw and in that age of hardware) that wa
On 6/16/25 2:38 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0
>
> On 6/16/25 2:11 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > OK,
> >
> > Now it is working with
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> > Iface
> > 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
> > enp0s2
> On 16 Jun 2025, at 18:11, Robert McBroom via users
> wrote:
>
> System dates from 2007. With f41 running would think the Alma OS would also
That’s a very old system, which I assume Alma does not support.
Fedora and Alma do not make matching choices on CPU support.
Fedora deliberately suppor
On Mon, 2025-06-16 at 09:55 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 6/16/25 3:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > A widespread convention is to add "- SOLVED" to the subject
> > line when the solution has been found.
>
> What format do you prfefer?
>
> Re: SOLVED - waterfox rpms?
> SO
OK,
Now it is working with
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0
enp0s20f0u11
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 bridge0
On 6/16/25 12:25 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
Both interface are in shared to o
>
> On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
> > PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
> > This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
> > Both interface are in shared to other computers
> >
> > The p
On 6/14/25 11:28 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
Hello,
I tried to fix a small issue that I have.
PC A is connected to internet through a USB port.
This PC A has 2 RJ45 cards, connected to 2 PC: B and C.
Both interface are in shared to other computers
The problem is this one.
I use /etc/host
On 6/16/25 10:16 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Robert McBroom via users wrote:
From the Fedora 41 installation
~]# ld.so --help
[...]
Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order:
x86-64-v4
x86-64-v3
x86-64-v2
None of those say "supported, searched" which indicates it
does
On 6/16/25 3:59 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
A widespread convention is to add "- SOLVED" to the subject
line when the solution has been found.
What format do you prfefer?
Re: SOLVED - waterfox rpms?
SOLVED Re: - waterfox rpms?
Re: waterfox rpms? = SOLVED
Or just anywhere?
-T
--
_
Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> However, trying to eliminate all possibilities led me to
> the answer. And that is, it likely was the case that the
> tarball that was created and I was using had this outdated
> libssl.so.1.1 included inside it. So, I created a new
> tarball (with the code that was
Robert McBroom via users wrote:
> From the Fedora 41 installation
> ~]# ld.so --help
[...]
> Subdirectories of glibc-hwcaps directories, in priority order:
> x86-64-v4
> x86-64-v3
> x86-64-v2
None of those say "supported, searched" which indicates it
doesn't support x86-64-v2 or newer.
Here is
On 6/14/25 6:01 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
On 14 Jun 2025, at 04:35, Robert McBroom via users
wrote:
CentOs 9.4 installation is going into kernel panic. Trying to get
access to the system from a running Fedora 41 installation.
~]# mount /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sysimage
~]# for dir in /dev /proc /sys;
On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 19:22 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> This is a mailing list that is archived. It would be helpful to future
> readers stumped at a similar issue later on, to be specific in what the
> problem was, and what worked. Just summarize what helped, or be specific in
> you
21 matches
Mail list logo
