Thanks, Jeff!
On Sun Jun15'25 09:01:16PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> From: Jeffrey Walton
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:01:16 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> CC: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users
>
> Subject: Re: is there a way to dis
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 9:48 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
wrote:
>
> Thanks for this!
>
> On Sun Jun15'25 08:45:38PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I see libPropList is listed as a BuildRequires. Is it
> > needed at build or install time? Typically, I'd expect the
> > BuildRequires to be m
Hi Todd,
Thanks for this!
On Sun Jun15'25 08:45:38PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> From: Todd Zullinger
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 20:45:38 -0400
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: is there a way to disable dnf from ignoring conflicting
>
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 8:44 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
wrote:
>
> On Sun Jun15'25 08:26:29PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > From: Jeffrey Walton
> > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 20:26:29 -0400
> > To: Community support for Fedora users
> > CC: Ranjan Maitra
> > Reply-To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community su
On 6/15/25 4:27 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
1) I cannot configure properly manually my interfaces on PC A, ie. enp1s0 and
enp2s0
I do not know why.
I tried 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.0.2
They can't be in the same subnet unless they are bridged somewhere. And
you won't have the forwarding and
Hi,
Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I have a program called gbuffy which is very old, but used to compile fine in
> F41 (and even in F42).
>
> I am able to create a RPM but I have a strange problem in that while
> installing it, I get:
>
> $ sudo dnf install ../RPMS/x86_64/gbuffy-0.2.8-3.fc4
Hi Jeff!
Thanks!
On Sun Jun15'25 08:26:29PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> From: Jeffrey Walton
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 20:26:29 -0400
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> CC: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: noloa...@gmail.com, Community support for Fedora users
>
> Subject: Re: is there a way to
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 7:15 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
wrote:
>
> On Sun Jun15'25 09:30:27PM, Marco Moock wrote:
> > From: Marco Moock
> > Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:30:27 +0200
> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> > Subject: Re: is there a way
I will just top-post here because I am not really responding to any part of the
message.
This is a mailing list that is archived. It would be helpful to future readers
stumped at a similar issue later on, to be specific in what the problem was,
and what worked. Just summarize what helped, or be
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 7:31 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> On 6/15/25 3:33 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 4:51 PM ToddAndMargo via users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/14/25 11:43 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 2:12 PM ToddAndMargo via users
> >>>
On 6/15/25 3:33 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 4:51 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 6/14/25 11:43 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 2:12 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 6/13/25 6:55 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
[...]
Hi Todd,
And thank you for
This is what I have done.
1) I cannot configure properly manually my interfaces on PC A, ie. enp1s0 and
enp2s0
I do not know why.
I tried 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.0.2
Thenk I played with Gateway and DNS.
Hence, I switched to shared to other computer.
it turned to 10.42.0.1 and 10.42.1.1
Then, I can m
On Sun Jun15'25 09:30:27PM, Marco Moock wrote:
> From: Marco Moock
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:30:27 +0200
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: is there a way to disable dnf from ignoring conflicting
> requests
>
> Am 15.06.2025 um 14
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 4:51 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> On 6/14/25 11:43 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 2:12 PM ToddAndMargo via users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/13/25 6:55 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >> Hi Todd,
> >>
> >> And thank you for all y
On 6/14/25 12:22 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
All the information necessary to assist me with my question
was provided in my initial post and subsequent posts.
Somewhere you got lost or confused. Would you like me
to go over each of your points above and explain what
On 6/14/25 11:43 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 2:12 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 6/13/25 6:55 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
[...]
Hi Todd,
And thank you for all your assistance.
All the information necessary to assist me with my question
was provided in my initial
On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 2:52 PM Ranjan Maitra via users
wrote:
>
> I have a program called gbuffy which is very old, but used to compile fine in
> F41 (and even in F42).
>
> I am able to create a RPM but I have a strange problem in that while
> installing it, I get:
>
> $ sudo dnf install ../RPM
On 6/15/25 12:32 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/15/25 1:42 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
PC A is connected to internet and it is fine. device enp0s20f0u11
It is in automatic setting.
This PC has 2 ethernet cards
By default
enp1s0 (connected to PC B) and enp2s0 (connected to PC C)
If I unders
On 6/15/25 1:42 AM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote:
PC A is connected to internet and it is fine. device enp0s20f0u11
It is in automatic setting.
This PC has 2 ethernet cards
By default
enp1s0 (connected to PC B) and enp2s0 (connected to PC C)
If I understand PC A run as a router.
By default (sh
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 at 19:52, Ranjan Maitra via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I have a program called gbuffy which is very old, but used to compile fine
> in F41 (and even in F42).
>
> I am able to create a RPM but I have a strange problem in that while
> installing it, I get:
>
Am 15.06.2025 um 14:25:06 Uhr schrieb Ranjan Maitra via users:
> BUt I wonder where this different version comes in? Can I specify the
> updated ssl version through the spec file or something else?
Do more binaries exist that might be the issue?
--
Gruß
Marco
Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1749
On Sun Jun15'25 09:15:10PM, Marco Moock wrote:
> From: Marco Moock
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 21:15:10 +0200
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: is there a way to disable dnf from ignoring conflicting
> requests
>
> Am 15.06.2025 um 13
Am 15.06.2025 um 13:51:35 Uhr schrieb Ranjan Maitra via users:
> $ sudo dnf install ../RPMS/x86_64/gbuffy-0.2.8-3.fc42.x86_64.rpm
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Failed to resolve the transaction:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides libcrypto.so
Hi,
I have a program called gbuffy which is very old, but used to compile fine in
F41 (and even in F42).
I am able to create a RPM but I have a strange problem in that while installing
it, I get:
$ sudo dnf install ../RPMS/x86_64/gbuffy-0.2.8-3.fc42.x86_64.rpm
Updating and loading repositori
I tried to set up manually which only one PC, using the network manager.
nm-connection-editor
offers very similar options to my understanding.
I configured manually the interface on PC A and on PB C.
I works, except the DNS does not work.
I did not find the right setting.
>
> On Sun, 2025-06-15 a
On Sun, 2025-06-15 at 01:37 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> The internet is connected through the USB interface. Then there are two
> RJ45 ports, one for each of B and C.
Yes, I know. I think *you* have failed to comprehend my responses,
initial and subsequent. Read through them again, carefully.
Hello,
Thank for the feedback.
I am sorry for the confusion.
PC A is connected to internet and it is fine. device enp0s20f0u11
It is in automatic setting.
This PC has 2 ethernet cards
By default
enp1s0 (connected to PC B) and enp2s0 (connected to PC C)
If I understand PC A run as a router.
By d
On 6/15/25 1:11 AM, Tim via users wrote:
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
USB device
10.42.0.254
| <-- Top half in same IP range
| as themselves (first three
10.42.0.1
On 6/14/25 10:04 PM, Tim via users wrote:
> > USB device
> > 10.42.0.254
> > | <-- Top half in same IP range
> > | as themselves (first three
> > 10.42.0.1 quads match each oth
29 matches
Mail list logo
