Todd,
Thanks very much again!
> >
> > Oh, I see. I put in the BuildRequires now, but also made
> > the changes below. I am not sure I needed to put in the
> > BuildRequires but I did it anyway. Btw, it appears to me
> > that the Requires should no longer be needed, since the
> > image that is th
Hi,
Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> On Sun Jun01'25 09:09:55PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> 'ln -s' works because it doesn't actually need the target to
>> create the link. If you did a build in mock and then looked
>> for the target file in the chroot, it's not there because
>> there's no BuildReq
Todd,
Thanks very much for this!
On Sun Jun01'25 09:09:55PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> From: Todd Zullinger
> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:09:55 -0400
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)
>
Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> [As a note, upstream is in trouble because the maintainer
> is quite unwell, judging by the ticket responses on the
> slimfork site. I hope he recovers well and soon, at least
> for his sake.]
Yes, I hope they get well soon.
> So, I think that there are two option
Thanks again!
On Sun Jun01'25 10:11:16AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> From: Todd Zullinger
> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 10:11:16 -0400
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)
>
> francis.montag...
On Sun Jun01'25 04:04:38PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> From: Todd Zullinger
> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 16:04:38 -0400
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: F41 -> F42 (openbox+slim: X does not get started)
>
> Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> Thank you to both!
>
> OK, dealing with the pam first, here is the problem.
>
>>
>>> Another point: /etc/pam.d/slim uses pam_console.so that is not
>>> provided (any more ?) on F42.
>>
>> The pam_console.so was removed from pam in Fedora 39:
>>
>> https://fedor
Thank you to both!
OK, dealing with the pam first, here is the problem.
>
> > Another point: /etc/pam.d/slim uses pam_console.so that is not
> > provided (any more ?) on F42.
>
> The pam_console.so was removed from pam in Fedora 39:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemovePamConsole
>
francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jun 2025 07:48:16 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
>
>> I don't know slim, but being a display manager, it's him that starts
>> Xorg. Look thus for slim traces in the journal, and also in it's
>> logfiles: /var/log/slim.log
>
> I installed sli
Le 01/06/2025 à 11:02, François Patte a écrit :
Bonjour,
I have made a great error installing "lightdm-settings" : it is
supposed to help to configure the startup screenof lightdm...
Not only does it not do what is requested, but it is also impossible
to get rid of what it has done.
I rem
Hi,
Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> Btw, I noticed that 1.4.1 has the following as changelog:
>
> * Adjusted how/when the pseudo-root window is created and removed, in
> preparation for handling multiple monitors in SLiM
> * Adjusted slimlock to use the panel class in the way it was
Bonjour,
I have made a great error installing "lightdm-settings" : it is supposed
to help to configure the startup screenof lightdm...
Not only does it not do what is requested, but it is also impossible to
get rid of what it has done.
I remove that package and erased the slick-greeter.conf
On Sun, 01 Jun 2025 07:48:16 +0200 francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> I don't know slim, but being a display manager, it's him that starts
> Xorg. Look thus for slim traces in the journal, and also in it's
> logfiles: /var/log/slim.log
I installed slim on a test machine. /var/log/slim.log says:
13 matches
Mail list logo
