On 4/13/25 8:18 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/9/25 1:16 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/9/25 12:06 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/8/25 10:43 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2025 at 8:10 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 41
dump-0.4-0.57.b47.fc41.x86_64
On 5/4/25 3:53 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
I have two servers affected by:
restore: : ftruncate: Invalid argument
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359295
This is pretty critical to me. And pretty much anyone
using dump/restore. The maintainer seems to be ignoring
t
On 5/8/25 5:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/8/25 5:22 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/8/25 4:57 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/8/25 4:54 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 41
borgbackup-1.4.1-1.fc41.x86_64
In my testing an hot to write up I made myself of borg
backup, I found somethi
On 5/8/2025 5:32 AM, George N. White III wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 7:59 PM home user via users
wrote:
On 5/7/25 6:35 AM, George N. White III wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:49 PM home user via users
> mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> wrote:
[...]
So I hav
On 5/8/25 5:22 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/8/25 4:57 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/8/25 4:54 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 41
borgbackup-1.4.1-1.fc41.x86_64
In my testing an hot to write up I made myself of borg
backup, I found something confusing.
I backed up three file a
On 5/8/25 4:57 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/8/25 4:54 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 41
borgbackup-1.4.1-1.fc41.x86_64
In my testing an hot to write up I made myself of borg
backup, I found something confusing.
I backed up three file and restored them (somewhere else).
The sha256sum m
On 5/8/25 4:54 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 41
borgbackup-1.4.1-1.fc41.x86_64
In my testing an hot to write up I made myself of borg
backup, I found something confusing.
I backed up three file and restored them (somewhere else).
The sha256sum matched the originals but the du's did n
Hi All,
Fedora 41
borgbackup-1.4.1-1.fc41.x86_64
In my testing an hot to write up I made myself of borg
backup, I found something confusing.
I backed up three file and restored them (somewhere else).
The sha256sum matched the originals but the du's did not.
What am I missing?
Many thanks,
-T
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 7:59 PM home user via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 5/7/25 6:35 AM, George N. White III wrote:
> > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 9:49 PM home user via users
> > mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> > wrote:
> [...]
> So I have people saying I should use ddr
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 00:20 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> "avoid all these problems"?? Note, I said "Unlike many reports I've
> never had problems or reasons to switch."
>
> There may be some advantage to the downloading packages provided by
> the distribution rather than by rpmfusion but my rose
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 16:00 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> (I am allergic to incremental backups -- they make me swear when it comes
> time to recover things.)
That's why I use mirrored drives. Belt and braces. Plus I can store a
*lot* of history because of dedupes and compression:
# bor
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 16:47 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > My concern with Borg is that by telling it to backup
> > "/", it will also catch everything in /lin-bak, which
> > is considerable and not exclusive to only my dump archives.
> >
> > How do you handle the issue?
> >
> > -T
>
>
On 5/8/25 12:26 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
-b, --bytes
equivalent to '--apparent-size --block-size=1'
I read that in the man page. I did not realize what
it meant. And it is "obvious". Mumble Mumble.
--
___
users mailing
On 5/8/25 12:08 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/7/25 11:37 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/7/25 9:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/7/25 8:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
So bytes or KB? If I specify --bytes on the line, I
get the apparent file size. I am after the sparse size.
Apparent
On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 16:05 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> I am still trying to figure out a way to get customers to
> actually read their backup report. I put the freakin'
> statues in their eMail's subject line. They don't ever
> have to read the body. But no. Can't be bother
On 5/7/25 11:37 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/7/25 9:43 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/7/25 8:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
So bytes or KB? If I specify --bytes on the line, I
get the apparent file size. I am after the sparse size.
Apparent size defaults to KB.
If you don't spe
16 matches
Mail list logo
