Re: securing this workstation.

On 4/28/25 5:26 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Apr 27, 2025, at 23:44, home user via users wrote: # firewall-cmd --list-all FedoraWorkstation (default, active) target: default ingress-priority: 0 egress-priority: 0 icmp-block-inversion: no interfaces: eno1 sources: services: dhc

Re: securing this workstation.

On 4/28/25 3:59 AM, Barry Scott wrote: On 28 Apr 2025, at 04:44, home user wrote: What I get: # firewall-cmd --list-all FedoraWorkstation (default, active)  target: default  ingress-priority: 0  egress-priority: 0  icmp-block-inversion: no  interfaces: eno1  sources:  services: dhcpv6-clien

Re: securing this workstation.

home user via users wrote: > > # firewall-cmd --list-all > > FedoraWorkstation (default, active) > > target: default > > ingress-priority: 0 > > egress-priority: 0 > > icmp-block-inversion: no > > interfaces: eno1 > > sources: > > services: dhcpv6-client samba-client ssh > > ports: 1025-65

Re: Post-F42-Upgrade Error Messages

Jeffrey Walton: > > Maybe related to > > ? Sam Varshavchik: > Yes, that's what that's all about. And by about F50, give or take a release, > I expect that we'll get rid of the rest of ALL thise yucky different > directories altogether

Re: securing this workstation.

> On Apr 28, 2025, at 7:26 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Apr 27, 2025, at 23:44, home user via users > wrote: > Let me get this straight…. > > You’ve posted both your user’s and root’s hashed passwords to a public list, > AND mentioned that you’ve

Re: securing this workstation.

On Apr 27, 2025, at 23:44, home user via users wrote: > # firewall-cmd --list-all > FedoraWorkstation (default, active) > target: default > ingress-priority: 0 > egress-priority: 0 > icmp-block-inversion: no > interfaces: eno1 > sources: > services: dhcpv6-client samba-client ssh > ports:

Re: suspend option

On 4/28/25 5:24 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: On 4/28/25 4:15 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: I do not have the suspend option available in the gnome menu for a while now. How can I recover it ? It's not in the power button menu? What kind of computer is it? What happens if you cli

Re: suspend option

On 4/28/25 5:23 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: ○ sleep.target Loaded: masked (Reason: Unit sleep.target is masked.) Active: inactive (dead) ○ suspend.target Loaded: masked (Reason: Unit suspend.target is masked.) Active: inactive (dead) ○ hibernate.target Loade

Re: suspend option

> > On 4/28/25 4:15 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > > I do not have the suspend option available in the gnome menu > > for a while now. > > How can I recover it ? > > It's not in the power button menu? > What kind of computer is it? > What happens if you click the physical power button?

Re: suspend option

○ sleep.target Loaded: masked (Reason: Unit sleep.target is masked.) Active: inactive (dead) ○ suspend.target Loaded: masked (Reason: Unit suspend.target is masked.) Active: inactive (dead) ○ hibernate.target Loaded: masked (Reason: Unit hibernate.target is masked.)

Re: suspend option

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 7:16 PM Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > > I do not have the suspend option available in the gnome menu > for a while now. > How can I recover it ? Show the output of `systemctl status sleep.target suspend.target hibernate.target hybrid-sleep.target`. Jeff -- ___

Re: suspend option

On 4/28/25 4:15 PM, Patrick Dupre via users wrote: I do not have the suspend option available in the gnome menu for a while now. How can I recover it ? It's not in the power button menu? What kind of computer is it? What happens if you click the physical power button? -- _

suspend option

Hello, I do not have the suspend option available in the gnome menu for a while now. How can I recover it ? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com ===

Re: script(1) missing from fedora42

On Mon, 2025-04-28 at 21:33 +0100, Barry wrote: > > > On 28 Apr 2025, at 20:42, Alex wrote: > > > > Of course, a few minutes after I posted this, I figured it out. > > > > /usr/bin/script is now in util-linux-script. > > A nice trick is that dnf can install given the path to a program. > > d

Re: Post-F42-Upgrade Error Messages

Jeffrey Walton writes: On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 7:58 AM Tim Evans wrote: > > >>> Running trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet: > filesystem-0:3.18-36.fc42.x86_64 /usr/sbin cannot be merged, Found > /usr/sbin/dm_dso_reg_tool Maybe related to

Re: script(1) missing from fedora42

> On 28 Apr 2025, at 20:42, Alex wrote: > > Of course, a few minutes after I posted this, I figured it out. > > /usr/bin/script is now in util-linux-script. A nice trick is that dnf can install given the path to a program. dnf install /usr/bin/script Barry --

Re: script(1) missing from fedora42

> I've just upgraded from f40 to f42 and noticed /usr/bin/script is no > longer part of util-linux. Where can I find it? > > It also seems the typescript package is completely different, so that's > not it, lol. > Of course, a few minutes after I posted this, I figured it out. /usr/bin/script is

script(1) missing from fedora42

Hi, I've just upgraded from f40 to f42 and noticed /usr/bin/script is no longer part of util-linux. Where can I find it? It also seems the typescript package is completely different, so that's not it, lol. Thanks, Alex -- ___ users mailing list -- user

Re: securing this workstation.

Am 27.04.2025 um 20:53:15 Uhr schrieb Barry: > > On 27 Apr 2025, at 18:37, Marco Moock wrote: > > > > I do run additional SPI firewalls > > Is this a commercial or open source SPI firewall? On the Linux systemd I use firewalld, which is free software, the hardware is a cisco router with its

Re: sagemath

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 11:03 AM Patrick Dupre via users wrote: > If I am correct, there was a sagemath package in the past, but it seems > that it is not available anymore. > Could somebody clarifies the situation? The person who originally created the sagemath package just stopped maintaining i

sagemath

Hello, If I am correct, there was a sagemath package in the past, but it seems that it is not available anymore. Could somebody clarifies the situation? Thanks === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pd

Re: Merge /usr/bin & /usr/sbin after upgrade to F42?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025, at 8:50 AM, Doug H. wrote: > The Fedora 42 upgrade merged /usr/bin & /usr/sbin, using a symlink to > combine them. On some upgrades this will not happen due to issues noted > here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin > > It is not a big deal either wa

Re: Merge /usr/bin & /usr/sbin after upgrade to F42?

Hi On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:50:39 -0700 "Doug H." wrote: > Does anybody have an opinion on this? Seeing the postfix bug introduced by that (no sendmail), I wrote the attached script to finish the merge. It already worked on a few machines. -- francis #!/bin/bash -p dont () { if [ "$DONT"

Merge /usr/bin & /usr/sbin after upgrade to F42?

The Fedora 42 upgrade merged /usr/bin & /usr/sbin, using a symlink to combine them. On some upgrades this will not happen due to issues noted here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unify_bin_and_sbin It is not a big deal either way, but I just noticed that it causes the kernel to get marked

Re: securing this workstation.

On 4/28/25 05:51, Tim via users wrote: Samuel Sieb wrote: I am so curious how you installed it to get that. I've never seen root have a name other than "root". Barry Scott: It's the default on a new Fedora install. $ head -n 2 /etc/passwd root:x:0:0:Super User:/root:/bin/bash bin:x:1:1:bin

Re: Post-F42-Upgrade Error Messages

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 7:58 AM Tim Evans wrote: > > Since doing F41->F42 upgrades on a couple of my systems, I'm getting > error messages (on both) like these when doing dnf upgrades. They > reference different specific reasons, however, for the failure to merge. > > >>> Running trigger-post-un

Re: securing this workstation.

Samuel Sieb wrote: > > I am so curious how you installed it to get that. I've never seen > > root have a name other than "root". Barry Scott: > It's the default on a new Fedora install. > > $ head -n 2 /etc/passwd > root:x:0:0:Super User:/root:/bin/bash > bin:x:1:1:bin:/bin:/usr/sbin/nologin

Re: about systemd-resolved

Tim: > > And there are (or were?) various apps that look to Network Manager > > to tell if you're off- or on- line. Felix Miata: > I don't know why apps would care. When I want to know, I look at the > LEDs on my router and/or modem and/or ethernet port Likewise... I found it a problem. If one

Re: Fedora 41->42 hangs at 31% done

On Sat, Apr 26, 2025 at 5:17 PM richard emberson wrote: > Back on 4/20 I tested the top 6.5 Gbs of the 8 Gbs on the system using > /bin/memtester > and that passed. > Not knowing if my system would even come up if I tried to reboot, I > decided to wait > until I had to reboot. I saw post stating

Post-F42-Upgrade Error Messages

Since doing F41->F42 upgrades on a couple of my systems, I'm getting error messages (on both) like these when doing dnf upgrades. They reference different specific reasons, however, for the failure to merge. >>> Running trigger-post-uninstall scriptlet: filesystem-0:3.18-36.fc42.x86_64 /usr/

Re: securing this workstation.

> On 28 Apr 2025, at 04:44, home user wrote: > > What I get: > > # firewall-cmd --list-all > FedoraWorkstation (default, active) > target: default > ingress-priority: 0 > egress-priority: 0 > icmp-block-inversion: no > interfaces: eno1 > sources: > services: dhcpv6-client samba-client s

Re: securing this workstation.

> On 28 Apr 2025, at 06:53, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > I am so curious how you installed it to get that. I've never seen root have > a name other than "root". It's the default on a new Fedora install. $ head -n 2 /etc/passwd root:x:0:0:Super User:/root:/bin/bash bin:x:1:1:bin:/bin:/usr/sbin/nol

Re: Curse the login screen!

On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 20:37 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > There's no need to remove any of them. You can only use one at a time > > so the presence of others is irrelevant. > > > > poc > > Every time I have had two going, it has been an > unpredictable mess.  This not suppose to be the

Re: about systemd-resolved

Tim composed on 2025-04-28 15:16 (UTC+0930): > On Sun, 2025-04-27 at 13:58 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >> Having no mobile computers, and none using wireless networking, I find >> myself to >> be the only network manager needed, and barely so, so have no network manager >> installed > It can stil