Tim:
> > better filtering options [follow and ignore],
Sam Varshavchik:
> Mailing lists do a far better job of weeding out the crap simply by the
> virtue of requiring a subscription to go through, first, then whitelisting
> the subscriber addresses.
While there's that, I was thinking more on
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 5:38 PM Sam Varshavchik
wrote:
> Frank Bures writes:
>
> > On 2025-04-16 15:58, Tim via users wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> This is Linux, we should be on usenet! ;-)
> >
> > I could not agree more.
> >
> > BTW, are you aware of any good and free NNTP servers out there?
>
> Sacri
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 7:48 PM Paolo Galtieri wrote:
>
> Folks,
> under F40 when I login after booting my system all my externally attached
> usb drives are mounted. Today I upgraded that system to F41 and now only a
> subset of the drives are mounted. Here is what I see in the log for one o
On 4/16/25 4:48 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
under F40 when I login after booting my system all my externally
attached usb drives are mounted. Today I upgraded that system to F41
and now only a subset of the drives are mounted. Here is what I see in
the log for one of the drives:
Does it sho
Folks,
under F40 when I login after booting my system all my externally
attached usb drives are mounted. Today I upgraded that system to F41
and now only a subset of the drives are mounted. Here is what I see in
the log for one of the drives:
Apr 16 16:23:47 caseyjones.homenet192-168-10.co
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:22 PM Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> > On an AMD workstation I am unable to update 41->42. When I try (using
>> > recommended
>> > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42
>> > sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot)
>> >
>> > On reboot, I get
>> > Kernel panic! (Attempted to
On 2025-04-16 15:58, Tim via users wrote:
This is Linux, we should be on usenet! ;-)
I could not agree more.
BTW, are you aware of any good and free NNTP servers out there?
Thanks
Frank
--
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraprojec
Frank Bures writes:
On 2025-04-16 15:58, Tim via users wrote:
This is Linux, we should be on usenet! ;-)
I could not agree more.
BTW, are you aware of any good and free NNTP servers out there?
Sacrilege… How can you forget eternal-september.org?
pgpRV5WbSklyN.pgp
Description: PGP si
I run MATE desktop and I followed the instructions listed here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/
and all went well on 3 systems.
Paolo
On 4/15/25 1:16 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/15/25 12:44 PM, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 20
Tim via users writes:
Joking aside, newsgroups were far superior to mailing lists and forums
Newsgroups never crossed my mind, as part of the great mailing lists vs.
forums discussions. But I have to agree with this, but only slightly.
(cached, no email addresses needed to post that would
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 4:30 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/16/25 11:51 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > On an AMD workstation I am unable to update 41->42. When I try (using
> > recommended
> > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42
> > sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot)
> >
> > On reboot, I get
On Thu, 2025-04-17 at 05:28 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> lejeczek via users wrote:
> > > the only solution - in my mind - must be
> > > practical-programmatic one...
> > > to sync messaging content between the two (or more),
> > > pulling/pushing those two between each other so there is no
> >
On 4/16/25 1:19 PM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
I run MATE desktop and I followed the instructions listed here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/
and all went well on 3 systems.
Paolo
So far I have updates two of my four compute
using the Command line method
On 4/16/25 11:51 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
On an AMD workstation I am unable to update 41->42. When I try (using
recommended
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42
sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot)
On reboot, I get
Kernel panic! (Attempted to kill init)
That sounds like an existing is
lejeczek via users wrote:
> > the only solution - in my mind - must be
> > practical-programmatic one...
> > to sync messaging content between the two (or more),
> > pulling/pushing those two between each other so there is no
> > difference, the messaging-content is the same everywhere.
Patrick
Most of my machines seem to be working fine, but I have one critical one where
I have the notification for Fedora 42 in the gnome-software updates window, but
when I click the Download button, the progress bar shows up to about 4% and
then quits with no error message and reverts to showing the D
On an AMD workstation I am unable to update 41->42. When I try (using
recommended
sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=42
sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot)
On reboot, I get
Kernel panic! (Attempted to kill init)
I managed to recover but just doing a clean re-install. I was able to
sele
On Apr 14, 2025, at 22:07, Tim via users wrote:
>
> Not all bug reports are about the packaging. If Apache crashes while
> loading some very normal web content, for example, that's an Apache
> bug.
I can guarantee that the Apache HTTPd devs want Fedora to filter out all the
packaging bugs and
On Wed, 2025-04-16 at 10:15 +0200, lejeczek via users wrote:
> the only solution - in my mind - must be
> practical-programmatic one...
> to sync messaging content between the two (or more),
> pulling/pushing those two between each other so there is no
> difference, the messaging-content is the
On 16/04/2025 01:29, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Matthew Miller via devel-announce writes:
If you run into any trouble, or just have
questions, you can find help at:
* https://ask.fedoraproject.org/
This made me curious. Does anyone happen to know if the
equivalent of this E-mailed announcemen
Ranjan Maitra:
>> It is my understanding that my GRUB2 is installed on UEFI systems.
Marco Moock:
> In most cases it is, as it also provides an EFI bootloader that can
> boot Linux. Even if there are ways to boot the Linux kernel directly
> from the UEFI, most operating systems ship a boot loader
> On 16 Apr 2025, at 00:54, Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
>
> $ sudo fwupd
> sudo: fwupd: command not found
>
> However, fwupd is installed. Why can it not be found?
>
> $ sudo dnf install fwupd
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Package "fwupd-1.9.29-1.fc41.x86
22 matches
Mail list logo
