On 12/4/24 1:40 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I got the message below when I ran sudo DNF Upgrade. Why are these
messages appearing when I ran "sudo symlinks -r -d /" a couple of days
ago? After getting the messages I ran "sudo symlinks -r / | grep -i
dangling" again and it reported dangl
On 12/4/24 2:38 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
My main query with this was why do I get all those types of messages
from symlinks when I issue "sudo symlinks -r -d /" which is the command
to delete dangling symlinks?
It deleted the dangling ones, but it also printed all the other ones as
usual.
On 12/4/24 4:53 PM, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
On 12/4/24 4:09 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 5/12/24 08:03, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount?
Woul
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 8:16 PM Patrick Mansfield via users
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:32:48AM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > If you aren't using any containers, then it should be fine to remove. If
> > it's only a recommends, then you could probably just uninstall qemu anyway.
> > Why is
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:32:48AM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> If you aren't using any containers, then it should be fine to remove. If
> it's only a recommends, then you could probably just uninstall qemu anyway.
> Why is it a problem to have qemu installed?
I'd rather not have software installed
On 12/4/24 4:09 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 5/12/24 08:03, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount?
Would really like the mount to be on demand.
If you ar
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 22:38, Stephen Morris
wrote:
> On 5/12/24 09:06, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 4:55 PM Stephen Morris
> wrote:
>
>Each link is output with a classification of relative, absolute, dan‐
>gling, messy, lengthy, or other_fs.
>
> My main quer
On 5/12/24 09:06, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 4:55 PM Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Following DNF producing message about dangling symlinks again even though I removed dangling symlinks a
couple of days ago, I ran "sudo symlinks -r / | grep -i dangling" which showed dangling l
On 4/12/24 21:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/3/24 1:31 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 3/12/24 13:30, Tim via users wrote:
I didn't remember ever seeing an option in Thunderbird to suppress
those messages but that was a reasonable check to do.
Apparently, at some stage Thunderbird had an option for
On 5/12/24 09:28, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 4/12/24 21:23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/3/24 1:31 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 3/12/24 13:30, Tim via users wrote:
I didn't remember ever seeing an option in Thunderbird to suppress
those messages but that was a reasonable check to do.
Apparently, at
On 4/12/24 21:03, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 11:11 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
Out of what are probably the two current main ones on Linux, Evolution
and Thunderbird, I found Evolution to be the least worst. I know,
that's a terrible way to select a program to use. Thunde
On 4/12/24 11:41, Tim via users wrote:
Stephen Morris:
I'm not sure how Evolution does its thing as I've never used it. If I
had the time to invest in setting up a mail system I would still be
using Lotus Notes.
Over the years I've used Amiga, Windows, Linux, Mac, and mainframes
before the publ
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 4:55 PM Stephen Morris wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Following DNF producing message about dangling symlinks again even though
> I removed dangling symlinks a couple of days ago, I ran "sudo symlinks -r / |
> grep -i dangling" which showed dangling lock symlinks for Firefox and
>
On 5/12/24 05:24, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Whenever I try to mount some additional partitions on the system
drives the message box comes up saying that "Error mounting filesystem
'Not authorized to perform operation (udisks-error-quark, 4)'".
Previously a box would open allowing a passwo
Hi,
Following DNF producing message about dangling symlinks again even
though I removed dangling symlinks a couple of days ago, I ran "sudo
symlinks -r / | grep -i dangling" which showed dangling lock symlinks
for Firefox and Thunderbird and 5 dangling symlinks for a ".build-id"
folder. So
Hi,
I got the message below when I ran sudo DNF Upgrade. Why are these
messages appearing when I ran "sudo symlinks -r -d /" a couple of days
ago? After getting the messages I ran "sudo symlinks -r / | grep -i
dangling" again and it reported dangling symlinks in the ".build-id"
folder agai
On 5/12/24 08:03, Robert McBroom via users wrote:
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount?
Would really like the mount to be on demand.
If you are running KDE, check in System->Connected D
Noticed recently that my NTFS data partitions are getting mounted on
booting. They are not in fstab.
Is there a flag that causes the automount?
Would really like the mount to be on demand.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 12/4/24 9:59 AM, Patrick Mansfield via users wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:44:00AM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Dave Close wrote:
Patrick Mansfield wrote:
Why does the most recent systemd update pull in qemu?
That seems excessive.
Currently running Fedora 41 with systemd version 256.8
Whenever I try to mount some additional partitions on the system drives
the message box comes up saying that "Error mounting filesystem 'Not
authorized to perform operation (udisks-error-quark, 4)'". Previously a
box would open allowing a password to be entered. How can the earlier
behavior be
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:44:00AM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Dave Close wrote:
> > Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> >
> >> Why does the most recent systemd update pull in qemu?
> >> That seems excessive.
> >>
> >> Currently running Fedora 41 with systemd version 256.8-1,
> >> looks like the update
Dave Close wrote:
> Patrick Mansfield wrote:
>
>> Why does the most recent systemd update pull in qemu?
>> That seems excessive.
>>
>> Currently running Fedora 41 with systemd version 256.8-1,
>> looks like the update moves me to systemd version
>> 256.9-2.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 11:04 +, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> Doesn't Claws Mail satisfy all this criteria? To me, undoubtedly.
I did look at it, ages ago. And I do mean a very long time ago (this
will be in the pre-Fedora era of Red Hat Linux). I didn't like it at
the time, for reasons I've
On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 11:11:33 +1030
"Tim via users" wrote:
> Stephen Morris:
> > I'm not sure how Evolution does its thing as I've never used it. If I
> > had the time to invest in setting up a mail system I would still be
> > using Lotus Notes.
>
> Over the years I've used Amiga, Windows, Linu
On 12/3/24 7:01 PM, Robin Laing wrote:
On 2024-12-03 00.23, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Use btrfs next time (it's the default now).
I had so many issues with btrfs in the past that I am going to wait
until I read that the tools are as good as ext4. After multiple re-
installs due to corrupted file
On 12/3/24 1:31 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 3/12/24 13:30, Tim via users wrote:
I didn't remember ever seeing an option in Thunderbird to suppress
those messages but that was a reasonable check to do.
Apparently, at some stage Thunderbird had an option for that (it called
it QuoteCollapse), an
On Wed, 2024-12-04 at 11:11 +1030, Tim via users wrote:
> Out of what are probably the two current main ones on Linux, Evolution
> and Thunderbird, I found Evolution to be the least worst. I know,
> that's a terrible way to select a program to use. Thunderbird's
> slowness and what you see as you
27 matches
Mail list logo
