Can't remove xWayland

sudo dnf rm xorg* [sudo] password for ryan: Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: installed package gdm-1:47.0-8.fc41.x86_64 requires gnome-session-wayland-session, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package gnome-session-wayland-session-47.0.1-1.fc41.x86_64 requires

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

On 10/30/24 3:16 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote: The only sensible answer. It spoils the logical sequence. No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I forgot to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if your

Re: Can't remove xWayland

On 10/30/24 8:56 PM, Ryan Bach via users wrote: sudo dnf rm xorg* [sudo] password for ryan: Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: installed package gdm-1:47.0-8.fc41.x86_64 requires gnome-session-wayland-session, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package gnome-sessi

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 09:11 (UTC+1100): > I always wondered why there are two > entries for Fedora in the bios boot settings (that both look to be the > same name) Are dates and times on the two directories the same? What does GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR= contain? -- Evolution as taught

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On Thu, 2024-10-31 at 09:11 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote: > I always wondered why there are two entries for Fedora in the bios > boot settings (that both look to be the same name) and what you have > said is the indication of the shim that is being booted from, I'm now > wondering why there aren't t

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:17 PM Stephen Morris wrote: ... snip ... No problems, thankyou, I was just curious because the other thing I forgot > to mention is those organisations also had the "standard" that if your > reply was not top posted your reply would not be read. > I'll add that a) most

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:11 PM Stephen Morris wrote: > On 30/10/24 11:51, Go Canes wrote: > My output from efibootmgr is below. The boot order specified in the > output is the boot order specified in my motherboard bios, not the boot > orders specified in the grub menus. I don't think there

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

On 10/30/2024 03:46 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: although having said that I also get annoyed if I have to read through multiple mail threads to get the full context of what the reply is addressing, and in my view it is bad mail etiquette to not include that context Yes, you include enough text t

Re: Fedora 41 - Postgresql Problem

> On 10/30/2024 12:40 PM EDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:52:25AM -0400, Max Pyziur wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I have three machines running Fedora, one just completed the update. > > Generally, no problems updating. > > > > But I noticed there was deprecation o

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400 "Felix Miata" wrote: > Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100): > > > Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in > > consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the > > reasons for this mail list to

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

On 31/10/24 09:04, Bob Marčan via users wrote: On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:54:47 -0400 "Felix Miata" wrote: Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100): Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are

Re: How to install new kernels in grub?

On 30/10/24 11:51, Go Canes wrote: Boot0010* Fedora HD(1,GPT,6e58cd53-8fbd-4b97-bce2-fa7c43e105f3,0x800,0x64000)/\EFI\FEDORA\SHIM.EFI424f This is basically the same as Boot but loading shim.efi (instead of grubx64.efi directly). I don't know why there are additional bits after "SHIM.EFI

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

Stephen Morris composed on 2024-10-31 08:46 (UTC+1100): > Just on the etiquette front, every organisation I have worked in > consider it bad email etiquette to not top post replies, so what are the > reasons for this mail list to be averse to that methodology (just curious). A: Top-posters who

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

On 30/10/24 21:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote: On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required. Nice tip! Also works in

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Oct 30, 2024, at 16:18, Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. If it’s a cron job that runs as your user as part of your login session (and shouldn’t ever run if yo

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:17:56 -0700 Dave Close wrote: > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run > X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron > job. I've made the upgrade from Fedora 39 to 41 (Xfce). Everything is OK. My X11 / C / Motif stuff k

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Once upon a time, Dave Close said: > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? That hasn't ever been true... -- Chris Adams -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to user

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:18 PM Dave Close wrote: > > Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? > I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. I don't run X so I can't say for certain. But there's a lot of X11 gear in the standard repos: $ d

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Is it still true that stock F41 does not include the ability to run X11? I'm stuck until Wayland has a way to invoke Firefox from a cron job. -- Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA "Tact is insulting a man without d...@compata.com, +1 714 434 7359his knowing it." dhcl...@alumni.caltech.edu

Re: dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

On Wed, 2024-10-30 at 12:48 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > RPMFusion users may want to wait for the third party repository to > rebuild its packages for F41. RPMfusion repos are already on F41. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject

dnf-system-upgrade to Fedora 41 is Ok

Hi Everyone, I just upgraded three machines to Fedora 41 using . The machines were two desktops and one server. All the machines use the default Fedora repos; and they do not use third party repos. The process went as expe

Re: Fedora 41 - Postgresql Problem

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:52:25AM -0400, Max Pyziur wrote: > Greetings, > > I have three machines running Fedora, one just completed the update. > Generally, no problems updating. > > But I noticed there was deprecation of postgresql, and when I went to > review/work on one of my databases

Fedora 41 - Postgresql Problem

Greetings, I have three machines running Fedora, one just completed the update. Generally, no problems updating. But I noticed there was deprecation of postgresql, and when I went to review/work on one of my databases via cli I received the following message: pyz@pegasus ~> psql commodities

Re: stop posting replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies of replies...

On Tue, 2024-10-29 at 17:26 -0700, Mike Wright wrote: > On 10/29/24 15:28, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > All I had to do in Evolution in replying to this was mark the text > > above before hitting Reply to List. No editing required. > > Nice tip! Also works in Thunderbird. It also used to work