On 10/27/24 08:24, Steve Forsythe wrote:
On 10/27/24 3:23 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/25/24 03:31, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 20:56, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
$ rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
kernel-6.11.4-201.
On 10/28/24 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/28/24 7:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 39
My /boot is almost full. 56% of it is
occupied by
rw---. 1 root root 121768072 Aug 29 2023 initramfs-0-
rescue-25f870556c344b599c639eb386296fa2.img
Is this normal?
Yes. If that's 50%
Hi All,
Fedora 39
My /boot is almost full. 56% of it is
occupied by
rw---. 1 root root 121768072 Aug 29 2023
initramfs-0-rescue-25f870556c344b599c639eb386296fa2.img
Is this normal?
Yours in confusion,
-T
--
___
users mailing list -- users
On 10/28/24 9:09 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/28/24 20:38, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/28/24 7:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 39
My /boot is almost full. 56% of it is
occupied by
rw---. 1 root root 121768072 Aug 29 2023 initramfs-0-
rescue-25f870556c344b599c639eb3
On 10/28/24 3:17 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I've been noticing for a little while that when looking at the
details for repository packages that it only populates the "File List"
section for installed packages, for uninstalled packages it just says
"Missing Info".
Is this just Dnfdragor
On 10/28/24 7:42 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 39
My /boot is almost full. 56% of it is
occupied by
rw---. 1 root root 121768072 Aug 29 2023 initramfs-0-
rescue-25f870556c344b599c639eb386296fa2.img
Is this normal?
Yes. If that's 50% of /boot, then the partition is much t
On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running
grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu
configuration for grub2-install to build those into the mbr.
regards,
Steve
Hi Steve,
I tried
# grub2-mkconfi
On 10/28/24 15:17, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I've been noticing for a little while that when looking at the
details for repository packages that it only populates the "File List"
section for installed packages, for uninstalled packages it just says
"Missing Info".
Is this just Dnfdra
Hi,
I've been noticing for a little while that when looking at the
details for repository packages that it only populates the "File List"
section for installed packages, for uninstalled packages it just says
"Missing Info".
Is this just Dnfdragora not doing things correctly or is this a
On 28/10/24 09:27, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:24, Stephen Morris wrote:
If you are still on a legacy bios system, from memory, before running
grub2-install you need to run grub2-mkconfig to build the grub menu
configuration for grub2-install to build those into the mbr.
rega
On 10/28/24 14:49, Dave Close wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Now what am I doing wrong?
[WineHQ]
name=WineHQ packages
type=rpm-md
baseurl=https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/fedora/40
gpgcheck=1
gpgkey=https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/winehq.key
enabled=1
# dnf upgrade --allowerasing --d
On 28/10/24 09:28, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/27/24 14:20, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 27/10/24 13:37, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/26/24 18:10, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/26/24 6:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/26/24 17:55, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/26/24 5:40 PM, ToddA
On 10/28/24 14:36, Will McDonald wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 21:25, ToddAndMargo via users
mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
wrote:
On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> fedora 41
41, or 40?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 5:25 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> fedora 41
> >>
> >> What am I doing wrong here?
> >>
> >> # cd /etc/yum.repos.d/
> >> # ls
> >> brave-browser-rpm-r
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 at 21:25, ToddAndMargo via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> fedora 41
>
41, or 40?
> >> What am I doing wrong here?
>
Consistently trying to r
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>Now what am I doing wrong?
>
>[WineHQ]
>name=WineHQ packages
>type=rpm-md
>baseurl=https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/fedora/40
>gpgcheck=1
>gpgkey=https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/winehq.key
>enabled=1
>
># dnf upgrade --allowerasing --disablerepo="WineHQ packages"
On 10/28/24 13:39, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
fedora 41
What am I doing wrong here?
# cd /etc/yum.repos.d/
# ls
brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_.repo
fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
fedora.repo
fedora-updates.repo
fedora-updates-tes
On 10/28/24 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
fedora 41
What am I doing wrong here?
# cd /etc/yum.repos.d/
# ls
brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_.repo
fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
fedora.repo
fedora-updates.repo
fedora-updates-testing.repo
winehq.repo
# dnf upgrade --
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024, at 12:33 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> fedora 41
>
> What am I doing wrong here?
>
> # cd /etc/yum.repos.d/
> # ls
> brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_.repo
> fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
> fedora.repo
> fedora-updates.repo
> fedora-updates-testing.
Hi All,
fedora 41
What am I doing wrong here?
# cd /etc/yum.repos.d/
# ls
brave-browser-rpm-release.s3.brave.com_x86_64_.repo
fedora-cisco-openh264.repo
fedora.repo
fedora-updates.repo
fedora-updates-testing.repo
winehq.repo
# dnf upgrade --allowerasing --disable-repo=winehq*
No matching repos
On 25/10/2024 09:01, Andreas Fournier via users wrote:
After a recent update I noticed that the screen no longer goes dark
after a time of inactivity. I checked the settings and they are as
before.
Any way to get it back working?
Same here. I am on F39 and KDE Plasma 5.27.11(X11)
G
--
_
21 matches
Mail list logo
