On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 1:07 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> On 10/23/24 21:26, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> $ rpm -qa kernel
> >> kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> >> kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
> >> kernel-6.11.4-201
On 10/23/24 21:39, Tim via users wrote:
ToddAndMargo:
Sort of like the firefighter whose house burns down
whilst he is out putting someone else's house out.
Just up the road from me, the firestation's kitchen caught fire while
they were out on a job, another station's crew had to come in and p
On 10/23/24 21:26, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
$ rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64
Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub.
How do I get the 40 kernel to show in
ToddAndMargo:
> Sort of like the firefighter whose house burns down
> whilst he is out putting someone else's house out.
Just up the road from me, the firestation's kitchen caught fire while
they were out on a job, another station's crew had to come in and put
it out.
I'll bet they never live tha
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:39 AM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> ToddAndMargo:
> > Sort of like the firefighter whose house burns down
> > whilst he is out putting someone else's house out.
>
> Just up the road from me, the firestation's kitchen caught fire while
> they were out on a job, another station
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 11:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> $ rpm -qa kernel
> kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
> kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
> kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64
>
> Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub.
>
> How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub?
Let me Google that for
Hi All,
$ rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.5.10-200.fc38.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-100.fc39.x86_64
kernel-6.11.4-201.fc40.x86_64
Problem, only the 38 kernel shows in grub.
How do I get the 40 kernel to show in grub?
Yours in confusion,
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air con
On 10/23/24 17:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/23/24 4:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 16:47, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> The Fedora release upgrade process has always been solid.
That is my impression too. Not this time and not for me.
I have already upgraded two other Fedora machines
On 10/23/24 17:42, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 17:26, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 06:23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 7:20 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I have both MATE and Xfce installed.
Whilst I work on my xinit/lightdm problems,
I am firin
On 10/23/24 4:55 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 16:47, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> The Fedora release upgrade process has always been solid.
That is my impression too. Not this time and not for me.
I have already upgraded two other Fedora machines (test
VM and shop machine) to 41 WITH
On 10/23/24 06:23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 7:20 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I have both MATE and Xfce installed.
Whilst I work on my xinit/lightdm problems,
I am firing up my GUI with startx.
startx fires up xfce by default.
How to I tell startx I want to fire up M
On 10/23/24 2:56 PM, home user via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 3:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
wrote:
(f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
Selected command output...
-bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.
On 10/23/24 16:47, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/23/24 4:31 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 08:12, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> If your excellent backup worked so well, you would
> have no problem restoring "a ton of intellectual property".
I could easily do that, but when I go to t
On Oct 23, 2024, at 17:56, home user via users
wrote:
>
> On 10/23/24 3:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
>>>
>>> Selected command output...
>>>
>>> -bash.2[
On 10/23/24 4:31 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/24 08:12, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
> If your excellent backup worked so well, you would
> have no problem restoring "a ton of intellectual property".
I could easily do that, but when I go to this upgrade
again, the same thing will
Hi,
How do I unsubscribe a defunct email address that no longer works?
regards,
Steve
OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
users mailing list -- user
On 10/23/24 2:56 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 24/10/24 08:41, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Since the last couple of updates when I run "sudo dnf upgrade" I
get the following python error, is someone able to tell me what it
means please?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/pyt
On 10/23/24 08:12, Bob Marčan via users wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:39:24 -0700
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
On 10/23/24 06:20, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Please recognize that and stop spending list time trying to
fix something that is well beyond reason to repair.
I am repairing it.
Ther
On 10/23/2024 03:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
How do I unsubscribe a defunct email address that no longer works?
regards,
Steve
Read the instructions at the bottom of this, and every message from the
list. Since the email address in question is defunct, edit the From
header in t
On 10/23/24 08:43, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
There's something seriously wrong with this picture. Do you mean
seriously mean that if your machine suffered an irreparable fault such
as a hard disk crash, you would be out of business?
poc
Hi Patrick,
I have several customers running Fedora (f
On 10/23/24 3:44 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/23/2024 03:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
How do I unsubscribe a defunct email address that no longer works?
Read the instructions at the bottom of this, and every message from the
list. Since the email address in question is defunct, edit the Fro
If the email address is invalid and no longer works, won't mail from the
list to it bounce? If so, will the mailing list software automatically
remove it after so many bounced messages? Just curious.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 6:44 PM Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 10/23/2024 03:43 PM, Stephen Morris wrote
On 24/10/24 09:02, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 08:50 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
I randomly have an issue where having logged in to KDE from SDDM,
the KDE desktop with icons displays for a little while, and then it
shuts down to the SDDM login screen again. What d
On 10/23/24 3:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
wrote:
(f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
Selected command output...
-bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
-bash.3[~]:
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 08:50 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Hi,
> I randomly have an issue where having logged in to KDE from SDDM,
> the KDE desktop with icons displays for a little while, and then it
> shuts down to the SDDM login screen again. What do I look at to
> determine why?
Maybe
On 24/10/24 08:41, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
Since the last couple of updates when I run "sudo dnf upgrade" I
get the following python error, is someone able to tell me what it
means please?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/plugin.py", line 1
Hi,
I randomly have an issue where having logged in to KDE from SDDM,
the KDE desktop with icons displays for a little while, and then it
shuts down to the SDDM login screen again. What do I look at to
determine why?
regards,
Steve
OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP pu
Hi,
Since the last couple of updates when I run "sudo dnf upgrade" I
get the following python error, is someone able to tell me what it means
please?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/dnf/plugin.py", line 108, in
_caller
getattr(plugin, method
On 22/10/24 08:30, Barry wrote:
On 21 Oct 2024, at 22:14, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi,
How do I remove kmod-nvidia packages from _dnf_local when sudo dnf remove
kmod-nvidia-6.10.10-200.fc40.x86_64 says the package is not found and there is
nothing to do and sudo akmods --force won't rebui
On Oct 22, 2024, at 20:42, home user via users
wrote:
>
> (f-40; gnome; stand-alone dual-boot workstation; kernel 6.11.3)
>
> Selected command output...
>
> -bash.2[~]: rpm -qa kernel
> kernel-6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64
> kernel-6.11.3-200.fc40.x86_64
> -bash.3[~]:
>
> -bash.3[~]: rpm -qa kerne
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 06:39 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 10/23/24 06:20, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Please recognize that and stop spending list time trying to
> > fix something that is well beyond reason to repair.
>
> I am repairing it.
>
> There is a ton of intellectual property
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:39:24 -0700
"ToddAndMargo via users" wrote:
> On 10/23/24 06:20, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > Please recognize that and stop spending list time trying to
> > fix something that is well beyond reason to repair.
>
> I am repairing it.
>
> There is a ton of intellectual prope
On 10/23/24 06:20, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Please recognize that and stop spending list time trying to
fix something that is well beyond reason to repair.
I am repairing it.
There is a ton of intellectual property on this machine.
It would take me months to recreate it, even with my
excellent
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 04:39 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> On 10/23/24 02:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> Yet another reason to be discussing this on the Test list.
>>
>> They are not very responsive over there.
>
> They'll still want to hear about bugs. A
On 10/23/24 06:23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 7:20 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
I have both MATE and Xfce installed.
Whilst I work on my xinit/lightdm problems,
I am firing up my GUI with startx.
startx fires up xfce by default.
How to I tell startx I want to fire up M
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 10/22/24 2:04 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> What replaces --skip-broken in dnf5?
>>
>> # dnf --releasever=40 --skip-broken upgrade
>> Unknown argument "--skip-broken" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for
>> more information about the arguments.
[...]
> It
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 7:20 AM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> I have both MATE and Xfce installed.
> Whilst I work on my xinit/lightdm problems,
> I am firing up my GUI with startx.
>
> startx fires up xfce by default.
>
> How to I tell startx I want to fire up MATE?
Let me Google that for yo
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 10/22/24 16:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Fedora 40 (perhaps)
>> bash-completion-2.11-14.fc40.noarch
>>
>> When I open a (bash) terminal, I get the following errors
>>
>> bash: _comp_deprecate_func: command not found
>> bash: _comp_deprecat
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 04:39 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 10/23/24 02:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Yet another reason to be discussing this on the Test list.
>
> They are not very responsive over there.
They'll still want to hear about bugs. And either way, if you want to
test u
On 10/23/24 02:54, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Yet another reason to be discussing this on the Test list.
They are not very responsive over there.
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@li
Hi All,
I have both MATE and Xfce installed.
Whilst I work on my xinit/lightdm problems,
I am firing up my GUI with startx.
startx fires up xfce by default.
How to I tell startx I want to fire up MATE?
Many thanks,
-T (T/Mr.T/Todd/Dude/His Resplendence)
--
~~~
On 10/22/24 16:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 40 (perhaps)
bash-completion-2.11-14.fc40.noarch
When I open a (bash) terminal, I get the following errors
bash: _comp_deprecate_func: command not found
bash: _comp_deprecate_func: command not found
bash: _comp_deprecate_func: com
On 10/22/24 02:04, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
What replaces --skip-broken in dnf5?
# dnf --releasever=40 --skip-broken upgrade
Unknown argument "--skip-broken" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for
more information about the arguments.
-T (T/Mr.T/Todd/Dude/His Resplendence)
I
On 10/23/24 02:07, Tim via users wrote:
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 00:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
SELinux is preventing login from search access on
the directory /home/todd
Is that just it looking for a face image in your homespace to show on
the login screen?
# ausearch -c 'login' --
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 16:19 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 10/22/24 2:04 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What replaces --skip-broken in dnf5?
> >
> > # dnf --releasever=40 --skip-broken upgrade
> > Unknown argument "--skip-broken" for command "dnf5". Add "--help"
On Wed, 2024-10-23 at 00:54 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> SELinux is preventing login from search access on
> the directory /home/todd
Is that just it looking for a face image in your homespace to show on
the login screen?
> # ausearch -c 'login' --raw | audit2allow -M my-login
> ***
On 10/22/24 16:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 40 (perhaps)
bash-completion-2.11-14.fc40.noarch
When I open a (bash) terminal, I get the following errors
bash: _comp_deprecate_func: command not found
bash: _comp_deprecate_func: command not found
bash: _comp_deprecate_func: com
Hi All,
SELinux is preventing login from search access on
the directory /home/todd
# ausearch -c 'login' --raw | audit2allow -M my-login
IMPORTANT ***
To make this policy package active, execute:
semodule -i my-login.pp
# semodule -X 300 -i my-login.pp
On 10/22/24 11:52 PM, Tim via users wrote:
On Tue, 2024-10-22 at 22:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
You could keep your /home directory (assuming you aren't the person that
said they don't separate that), but yes, a wipe and re-install of the
root partition.
Long ago, probably back before Fedora
49 matches
Mail list logo
