On 7/8/23 21:35, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
After rebooting, my links were changed back:
libvirt-admin.so.0.9005.0
libvirt-lxc.so.0.9005.0
libvirt-qemu.so.0.9005.0
libvirt.so.0.9005.0
So I erased the links and the 9005 files too.
# systemctl status libvirtd.service
is happy after stopping
On 7/8/23 21:55, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 38
Is the version of qemu-kvm in the Fedora
repo using monolithic or modular daemons?
Many thanks,
-T
I do believe it is modular.
I followed these direction (I think Sam gave them to me)
https://www.libvirt.org/daemons.html#switching-to-
On 7/8/23 22:45, Justin Koh wrote:
On 2023-07-09 at 12:45 +0800, Justin Koh wrote:
# dnf group install server-product --assumeno
# dnf group install core --assumeno
Correction: the group names are
server-product-environment for Fedora Server Edition [1],
and minimal-environment for Minimal In
On 2023-07-09 at 12:45 +0800, Justin Koh wrote:
> # dnf group install server-product --assumeno
> # dnf group install core --assumeno
Correction: the group names are
server-product-environment for Fedora Server Edition [1],
and minimal-environment for Minimal Install.
There is a significant diff
Fedora 38
Is the version of qemu-kvm in the Fedora
repo using monolithic or modular daemons?
Many thanks,
-T
--
~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~
___
On 2023-07-08 at 22:51 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> Is there a way to use dnf or rpm to compare the listing of groups. For
> example, in my case I use "minimal install" or the "Fedora Server
> Edition" install. If I wanted to compare these two groups and the rpms
> that are in each, how woul
On 7/9/23 00:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 20:57, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/8/23 18:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# libvirtd --daemon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not
found (required by /lib64/libvirt-lxc.so.0)
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: ve
On 7/8/23 21:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 20:57, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/8/23 18:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# libvirtd --daemon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not
found (required by /lib64/libvirt-lxc.so.0)
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: ve
On 7/8/23 21:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# systemctl start libvirtd
And status shows good too !!
"virsh-manager" still does ont work. but...
And restarting libvirtd.service and it is back
to complaining again. But I will reboot
and get back
And starting libvirtd the correct way:
#
On 7/8/23 20:57, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/8/23 18:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# libvirtd --daemon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not
found (required by /lib64/libvirt-lxc.so.0)
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not
found (requir
On 7/8/23 18:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# libvirtd --daemon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not found
(required by /lib64/libvirt-lxc.so.0)
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.5.0' not found
(required by /lib64/libvirt-qemu.so.0)
Act
On 7/8/23 18:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 18:38, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 17:26, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
# rpm -qa libvirt-libs
libvirt-libs-9.0.0-3.fc38.x86_64
Removing and reinstalling both libvirt-daemon and
libvirt-libs did no
On 7/8/23 07:38, Doug Herr wrote:
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, at 5:11 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'm experimenting with hibernating rather than suspending my system
overnight. However I get this:
$ sudo systemctl hibernate
Call to Hibernate failed: Not enough swap space for hibernation
But:
$ fr
On 7/8/23 19:51, Bill Cunningham wrote:
Is there a way to use dnf or rpm to compare the listing of groups. For
example, in my case I use "minimal install" or the "Fedora Server
Edition" install. If I wanted to compare these two groups and the rpms
that are in each, how would I do that?
That i
On 7/8/23 13:47, Barry wrote:
On 7 Jul 2023, at 18:43, home user wrote:
When I try to verify a back-up, I use "diff -r". The directory trees being compared contain about
870 files (mostly binary, like PNG, JPG, and so on), and take up about 707 megabytes. The trees being
compared are on th
Is there a way to use dnf or rpm to compare the listing of groups. For
example, in my case I use "minimal install" or the "Fedora Server
Edition" install. If I wanted to compare these two groups and the rpms
that are in each, how would I do that?
B
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 13:26 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> It's normal to include the resume location in the initrd, thus including it
> on the
> kernel cmdline is either redundant, or an override, depending on the location
> there specified.
I think that *should* work if pre-configuration to allow
On 7/8/23 18:38, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 17:26, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
# rpm -qa libvirt-libs
libvirt-libs-9.0.0-3.fc38.x86_64
Removing and reinstalling both libvirt-daemon and
libvirt-libs did not change the symptom.
I tried downgrading. Tha
On 7/8/23 17:26, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
# rpm -qa libvirt-libs
libvirt-libs-9.0.0-3.fc38.x86_64
Removing and reinstalling both libvirt-daemon and
libvirt-libs did not change the symptom.
I tried downgrading. That did not help either.
If I had to guess, I'd
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
> # rpm -qa libvirt-libs
> libvirt-libs-9.0.0-3.fc38.x86_64
>
> Removing and reinstalling both libvirt-daemon and
> libvirt-libs did not change the symptom.
>
> I tried downgrading. That did not help either.
If I had to guess, I'd say you have some other li
On 7/8/23 17:10, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
Starting libvirtd directly gives:
# /usr/sbin/libvirtd &
[1] 10957
/usr/sbin/libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version
`LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.0.0' not found (required by /usr/sbin/libvirtd)
And I can not find what provide it:
On 7/8/23 17:04, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 7:52 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 7/8/23 16:44, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
# libvirtd --deamon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.0.0' not
found (required by libvirtd)
I
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
Starting libvirtd directly gives:
# /usr/sbin/libvirtd &
[1] 10957
/usr/sbin/libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.0.0' not
found (required by /usr/sbin/libvirtd)
And I can not find what provide it:
# dnf whatprovides LIBVIRT_PRIVATE
Last
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 7:52 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> On 7/8/23 16:44, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
> >> # libvirtd --deamon
> >> libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.0.0' not
> >> found (required by libvirtd)
> >>
> >> I have reinsta
On 7/8/23 16:44, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
# libvirtd --deamon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.0.0' not
found (required by libvirtd)
I have reinstalled libvirt-daemon. No joy.
Seems like somehow you don't have libvirt-libs installed, w
Once upon a time, ToddAndMargo said:
> # libvirtd --deamon
> libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.0.0' not
> found (required by libvirtd)
>
> I have reinstalled libvirt-daemon. No joy.
Seems like somehow you don't have libvirt-libs installed, which is odd
since dnf knows it
Hi All,
Fedora 38
libvirt-daemon-9.0.0-3.fc38.x86_64
Anyone know how to fix this?
# libvirtd --deamon
libvirtd: /lib64/libvirt.so.0: version `LIBVIRT_PRIVATE_9.0.0' not found
(required by libvirtd)
I have reinstalled libvirt-daemon. No joy.
Many thanks,
-T
_
Jon Ingason via users composed on 2023-07-08 23:09 (UTC+0200):
> skrev Felix Miata:
>> David Dembrow composed on 2023-07-08 12:12 (UTC-0400):
>>> Recently my video display freezes after a few minutes. The video card
>>> is an ATI Radeon dual head. Is there some configuration settings
>>> avail
On 7/8/23 14:05, Todd Zullinger wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 38
$ rpm -qa
...
:error: Verifying a signature using certificate
09E55FAF4F7862CD6D558997CDFB5FA52007B954 (Metasploit
):
1. Certificiate CDFB5FA52007B954 invalid: certificate is not alive
because: The primary
Den 2023-07-08 kl. 19:12, skrev Felix Miata:
David Dembrow composed on 2023-07-08 12:12 (UTC-0400):
Recently my video display freezes after a few minutes. The video card
is an ATI Radeon dual head. Is there some configuration settings
available that may work around whatever my failure may be?
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Fedora 38
>
> $ rpm -qa
> ...
> :error: Verifying a signature using certificate
> 09E55FAF4F7862CD6D558997CDFB5FA52007B954 (Metasploit
> ):
> 1. Certificiate CDFB5FA52007B954 invalid: certificate is not alive
> because: The primary key is not live
> be
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 1:09 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> [...]
> Yes, I think you're right. In fact I think I even asked about this in
> the distant past.
>
> There's an old joke:
> "I think I'm getting a combination of memory loss with déjà vu, because
> I may have forgotten about this before.
On 7/8/23 13:56, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 7/8/23 04:33, Peter Boy wrote:
Am 08.07.2023 um 09:13 schrieb ToddAndMargo via users
:
no symptom change after a reboot either.
I do not think there were to many tries.
Or five attempts failed right in a row
when I issued start
You shou
On 7/8/23 04:33, Peter Boy wrote:
Am 08.07.2023 um 09:13 schrieb ToddAndMargo via users
:
no symptom change after a reboot either.
I do not think there were to many tries.
Or five attempts failed right in a row
when I issued start
You should use journalctl to check the log entries in de
On 7/8/23 13:48, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 4:02 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
Fedora 38
How do I get rid of this fc36 package?
Generally speaking, there are some good steps for post-upgrade
cleanups at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 4:02 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
>
> Fedora 38
>
> How do I get rid of this fc36 package?
Generally speaking, there are some good steps for post-upgrade
cleanups at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-system-upgrade/#sect-optional-post-upgrade-tasks
.
> On 7 Jul 2023, at 18:43, home user wrote:
>
> When I try to verify a back-up, I use "diff -r". The directory trees being
> compared contain about 870 files (mostly binary, like PNG, JPG, and so on),
> and take up about 707 megabytes. The trees being compared are on the hard
> drive and
On 7/8/23 13:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 7/8/23 13:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I get rid of this fc36 package?
# dnf remove openni-1.5.7.10-26.fc36.x86_64
Dependencies resolved.
Running transaction
Preparing : 1/1
Running scriptlet: openni-1.5.7.10-26.fc36.x86_64
On 7/8/23 13:02, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
How do I get rid of this fc36 package?
# dnf remove openni-1.5.7.10-26.fc36.x86_64
Dependencies resolved.
Running transaction
Preparing : 1/1
Running scriptlet: openni-1.5.7.10-26.fc36.x86_64 1/1
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.zVmxL1: line 2:
Fedora 38
How do I get rid of this fc36 package?
# dnf remove openni-1.5.7.10-26.fc36.x86_64
Dependencies resolved.
PackageArchitecture Version Repository
Size
===
Fedora 38
$ rpm -qa
...
:error: Verifying a signature using certificate
09E55FAF4F7862CD6D558997CDFB5FA52007B954 (Metasploit
):
1. Certificiate CDFB5FA52007B954 invalid: certificate is not alive
because: The primary key is not live
because: Expired on 2019-09-02T13:04:52Z
2. Ke
Patrick O'Callaghan composed on 2023-07-08 18:09 (UTC+0100):
> On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 07:38 -0700, Doug Herr wrote:
>> I think the partition will also need to be listed in the Grub boot
>> line also.
> Yes, I think you're right. In fact I think I even asked about this in
> the distant past.
It's
On Sun, 2023-07-09 at 01:12 +0930, Tim via users wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 13:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > $ sudo systemctl hibernate
> > Call to Hibernate failed: Not enough swap space for hibernation
>
> I was under the impression that:
>
> It needed to hibernate to a swap part
David Dembrow composed on 2023-07-08 12:12 (UTC-0400):
> Recently my video display freezes after a few minutes. The video card
> is an ATI Radeon dual head. Is there some configuration settings
> available that may work around whatever my failure may be?
> The only hint I have about the failu
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 18:11 +0200, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sat, 08 Jul 2023 07:38:19 -0700 "Doug Herr" wrote:
>
> > If I remember right (and it has not changed) then you need an
> > actual swap
> > partition and not just a "swapfile".
>
> I have this feeling too.
>
> I app
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 07:38 -0700, Doug Herr wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, at 5:11 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'm experimenting with hibernating rather than suspending my system
> > overnight. However I get this:
> >
> > $ sudo systemctl hibernate
> > Call to Hibernate failed: Not enough s
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 08:34 -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On 7/8/23 03:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-07-07 at 19:11 -0600, home user wrote:
> > > What I back up is a mix of binary and text files. I understand
> > > that
> > > "diff" is not the best for binary files, but "cmp" do
Recently my video display freezes after a few minutes. The video card
is an ATI Radeon dual head. Is there some configuration settings
available that may work around whatever my failure may be?
The only hint I have about the failure is from the dmesg command I can
reach through one of the vi
Hi
On Sat, 08 Jul 2023 07:38:19 -0700 "Doug Herr" wrote:
> If I remember right (and it has not changed) then you need an actual swap
> partition and not just a "swapfile".
I have this feeling too.
I applied with success this article:
How to enable hibernation on Fedora Linux
https://www.ct
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 13:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> $ sudo systemctl hibernate
> Call to Hibernate failed: Not enough swap space for hibernation
I was under the impression that:
It needed to hibernate to a swap partition, not a file. Or, perhaps,
an accessible file at pre-boot time (
On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, at 5:11 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I'm experimenting with hibernating rather than suspending my system
> overnight. However I get this:
>
> $ sudo systemctl hibernate
> Call to Hibernate failed: Not enough swap space for hibernation
>
> But:
>
> $ free -h
>
On 7/8/23 03:31, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2023-07-07 at 19:11 -0600, home user wrote:
What I back up is a mix of binary and text files. I understand that
"diff" is not the best for binary files, but "cmp" does not have a
recursive option. "rsync" does copying. I don't see how that
c
I'm experimenting with hibernating rather than suspending my system
overnight. However I get this:
$ sudo systemctl hibernate
Call to Hibernate failed: Not enough swap space for hibernation
But:
$ free -h
totalusedfree shared buff/cache available
Mem:
> Am 08.07.2023 um 09:13 schrieb ToddAndMargo via users
> :
>
> no symptom change after a reboot either.
>
> I do not think there were to many tries.
>
> Or five attempts failed right in a row
> when I issued start
>
You should use journalctl to check the log entries in detail. This kind of
On Fri, 2023-07-07 at 19:11 -0600, home user wrote:
> What I back up is a mix of binary and text files. I understand that
> "diff" is not the best for binary files, but "cmp" does not have a
> recursive option. "rsync" does copying. I don't see how that
> command (including with the "--dry-run"
no symptom change after a reboot either.
I do not think there were to many tries.
Or five attempts failed right in a row
when I issued start
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedo
Fedora 38
# systemctl is-active virtqemud.socket
failed
# systemctl is-active virtqemud.service
failed
# systemctl start libvirtd
Job for libvirtd.service failed because the control process exited with
error code.
See "systemctl status libvirtd.service" and "journalctl -xeu
libvirtd.service
57 matches
Mail list logo
