Re: More fun with SSL certificates

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 6:22 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > My small web server appears to be working and even has https, however > I've noticed this in /var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log: > > [...] AH01909: bree.org.uk:443:0 server certificate does NOT include an ID > which matches the server name >

Re: More fun with SSL certificates

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 6:22 PM Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > My small web server appears to be working and even has https, however > I've noticed this in /var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log: > > [...] AH01909: bree.org.uk:443:0 server certificate does NOT include an ID > which matches the server name >

Fedora 37 mount command rejects ext4 option "nouser_xattr"

In Fedora 37, attempting to mount an ext4 filesystem with the "nouser_xattr" results in the generic failure message, "mount: ...: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock ... or other error." According to the manpage for ext4, this is a valid option. Note that the reverse "user_xattr" option i

Re: Systemd Unit Fails at Boot, but Succeeds when Started from the Console

On Mon, 1 May 2023 18:23:08 -0500 Roger Heflin wrote: > I have something like this in my rc.local for similar reasons. > ( sleep 30 ; cd /someplace ; ) & I'm surprised that works. I used to have that sort of thing directly in rc.local, then they converted the code that runs rc.local to a systemd

Re: Systemd Unit Fails at Boot, but Succeeds when Started from the Console

I have something like this in my rc.local for similar reasons. ( sleep 30 ; cd /someplace ; ) & On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 4:41 PM Tom Horsley wrote: > > On Mon, 01 May 2023 13:39:29 -0700 > Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > > And the problem remains. Further advice would be welcome. > > Without ever mana

Re: problem downloading rpms with wifi

I will answer this thread to close it out so if anyone with this problem that might refer to this thread, can have an answer or at least, a direction in which to go. I reinstalled everything and choose the wifi option and entered my wifi password. Then went back to the main screen that gives the

Re: More fun with SSL certificates

> On 1 May 2023, at 23:22, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > My small web server appears to be working and even has https, however > I've noticed this in /var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log: > > [...] AH01909: bree.org.uk:443:0 server certificate does NOT include an ID > which matches the server name

Post F38 upgrade/fresh install: printing text files via paps (a Postscript converter) prints raw postscript

Greetings, My F38 upgrade on my desktop and my fresh install on my laptop (because of an upgrade crash) are taking place in less than stellar fashion. But given that things have been going very well in this regard since F27 (circa late 2017) something like this shouldn't be unexpected. Tryi

More fun with SSL certificates

My small web server appears to be working and even has https, however I've noticed this in /var/log/httpd/ssl_error_log: [...] AH01909: bree.org.uk:443:0 server certificate does NOT include an ID which matches the server name The ServerName is set to bree.org.uk, and that's the name under which

Re: Systemd Unit Fails at Boot, but Succeeds when Started from the Console

> On 1 May 2023, at 22:41, Tom Horsley wrote: > > On Mon, 01 May 2023 13:39:29 -0700 > Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > >> And the problem remains. Further advice would be welcome. > > Without ever managing to determine what the problem was, I have > sometimes resorted to disabling the service, the

Re: Systemd Unit Fails at Boot, but Succeeds when Started from the Console

On Mon, 01 May 2023 13:39:29 -0700 Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > And the problem remains. Further advice would be welcome. Without ever managing to determine what the problem was, I have sometimes resorted to disabling the service, then making an rc.local script that uses the "at" command to start th

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

> Am 01.05.2023 um 22:22 schrieb David Woodyard : > > > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:33 AM David Woodyard wrote: > the server is what I need to install. > > David > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:28 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 01.05.2023 um 18:12 schrieb David Woodyard : > > > > I have s

Re: Systemd Unit Fails at Boot, but Succeeds when Started from the Console

On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 16:41 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Jonathan Ryshpan said: > > This unit  > >    $ cat /etc/systemd/system/noip-duc.service   > >    [Unit] > >    Description=No-IP Dynamic Update Client > >    After=network.target auditd.service > > This should probably be n

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:33 AM David Woodyard wrote: > the server is what I need to install. > > David > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:28 AM Peter Boy wrote: > >> >> >> > Am 01.05.2023 um 18:12 schrieb David Woodyard : >> > >> > I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on thi

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

On 5/1/23 12:01, Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 19:39 schrieb David Woodyard : NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS sda 8:01 931.5G 0 disk ├─sda1 8:11 14.7G 0 part └─sda2 8:21 916.9G 0 part └─md127 9:127 0 916.7G 0 raid1 /home sdb

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

> Am 01.05.2023 um 19:39 schrieb David Woodyard : > > ... > Fedora is the only OS. That’s good. So it is quite easy. > > Second bunch of questions: > > (a) > Do you need to keep data? If yes, how they are stored? On its own partition? > Both / and /home has raid1. > / of course will be ove

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

On 2023-05-01 1:05 p.m., Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 18:33 schrieb David Woodyard : the server is what I need to install. OK, o I guess Server will be the only Operating System on the device. And because you ‚see‘ sda and sdb, you don’t have a hardware raid but use a software raid. Sec

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Actually, I used the Custom icon next to the specific site, there's a separate global one on top. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https:/

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

It wasn't obvious to me where Custom was, I had to identify the icon on top with the S and the wrench. Hovering over that with the mouse says "Custom". I never had to do that with any other site. Some sites wouldn't load properly or at all without temporarily enabling Javascript, but this is the

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Felix Miata wrote: > No luck here finding anything to do with Custom or CSS in > NoScript in SeaMonkey. :( This may not help then, but here's what I have in noscript for discussion.fedoraproject.org: https://fedorapeople.org/~tmz/discourse-noscript.png -- Todd signature.asc Description: P

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 12:37 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > I think it's an annoyance that sites require such heavy > javascript to function. It's more than just an annoyance, that kind of thing makes them * slow to load (comparatively speaking, though sometimes so damn slow it's unbelievable)

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 12:06 PM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 01.05.2023 um 18:33 schrieb David Woodyard : > > > > the server is what I need to install. > > > OK, o I guess Server will be the only Operating System on the device. And > because you ‚see‘ sda and sdb, you don’t have a hardware raid bu

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 17:05 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > Yep, that was it. Thanks. I was using mozilla-noscript, and doing > what you suggested worked. I've never had to do that with any other > site as I've never seen any other site appear broken like this one. Just wanted to say thank you as

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Todd Zullinger composed on 2023-05-01 12:37 (UTC-0400): > Andre Robatino wrote: >> It's hard to describe, but >> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org is way too long >> vertically and looks like it hasn't loaded fully. There's >> a reference above to turning off "use style" but I don't >> know wh

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Andre Robatino wrote: > Yep, that was it. Thanks. I was using mozilla-noscript, > and doing what you suggested worked. I've never had to do > that with any other site as I've never seen any other site > appear broken like this one. Yes, discourse is the first time I've run into this type of thing.

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

> Am 01.05.2023 um 18:33 schrieb David Woodyard : > > the server is what I need to install. OK, o I guess Server will be the only Operating System on the device. And because you ‚see‘ sda and sdb, you don’t have a hardware raid but use a software raid. Second bunch of questions: (a) Do yo

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Yep, that was it. Thanks. I was using mozilla-noscript, and doing what you suggested worked. I've never had to do that with any other site as I've never seen any other site appear broken like this one. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 11:12 -0500, David Woodyard wrote: > I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on this > topic. > The error I get is sda1 and sdb1 have the same UUID. I would rather > not remove a drive from raid and unplug it to do the install. I assume you cloned a driv

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:13 AM David Woodyard wrote: > > I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on this topic. > The error I get is sda1 and sdb1 have the same UUID. I would rather not > remove a drive from raid and unplug it to do the install. > > I must be missing someth

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 12:54 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > In Firefox, Fedora's default browser, the page is barely legible, so > it's not surprising that it breaks at the drop of a hat. It appears > to be heavily under construction. Nothing jumps out at me as looking wrong. Perhaps something was

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

On 05/01/2023 10:37 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: I think it's an annoyance that sites require such heavy javascript to function. The big problem is sites created by webmonkeys who don't know how to build a webpage that doesn't use scads of javascript, even if it's a static page. ___

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

Andre Robatino wrote: > It's hard to describe, but > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org is way too long > vertically and looks like it hasn't loaded fully. There's > a reference above to turning off "use style" but I don't > know what that means or if that has anything to do with > the problem. I

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

the server is what I need to install. David On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 11:28 AM Peter Boy wrote: > > > > Am 01.05.2023 um 18:12 schrieb David Woodyard : > > > > I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on this > topic. > > The error I get is sda1 and sdb1 have the same UUID. I

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

On 05/01/2023 10:12 AM, David Woodyard wrote: I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on this topic. The error I get is sda1 and sdb1 have the same UUID. I would rather not remove a drive from raid and unplug it to do the install. Are you able to have both drives mounted

Re: I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

> Am 01.05.2023 um 18:12 schrieb David Woodyard : > > I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on this topic. > The error I get is sda1 and sdb1 have the same UUID. I would rather not > remove a drive from raid and unplug it to do the install. > > I must be missing somethi

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

It's hard to describe, but https://discussion.fedoraproject.org is way too long vertically and looks like it hasn't loaded fully. There's a reference above to turning off "use style" but I don't know what that means or if that has anything to do with the problem. I wouldn't expect to have to cha

I have not been able to install F37 on a computer that has RAID1

I have searched the web for a solution and have found nothing on this topic. The error I get is sda1 and sdb1 have the same UUID. I would rather not remove a drive from raid and unplug it to do the install. I must be missing something. Any help appreciated, David

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

> On 1 May 2023, at 13:54, Andre Robatino wrote: > > In Firefox, Fedora's default browser, the page is barely legible, so it's > not surprising that it breaks at the drop of a hat. It appears to be heavily > under construction. I can access both sites with firefox on fedora and they look go

solved - Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

On 5/1/23 09:01, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi On Mon, 01 May 2023 08:52:49 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have got the many *.nmconnection files moved to the F38 system into the /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections Owned by root:root with chmod 600 as the ones already there. When I

Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

Hi On Mon, 01 May 2023 08:52:49 -0400 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have got the many *.nmconnection files moved to the F38 system into > the /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections > Owned by root:root with chmod 600 as the ones already there. > When I look at the Edit Connections dialog in the X

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

In Firefox, Fedora's default browser, the page is barely legible, so it's not surprising that it breaks at the drop of a hat. It appears to be heavily under construction. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

Progress I have got the many *.nmconnection files moved to the F38 system into the /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections Owned by root:root with chmod 600 as the ones already there. When I look at the Edit Connections dialog in the Xfce panel network app, they are not listed. What do I ne

Solved - Re: F38 - QEMM image migration problem

It works! on F35 machine as root: virsh dumpxml fedora21 > f21.xml move f21.xml via USB stick to F38 and on F38 machine: virsh f21.xml create all done.  And I can save the xml for future migrations... thanks On 5/1/23 05:41, Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 11:26 schrieb Robert Moskowit

Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

On Mon, 2023-05-01 at 05:22 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > In copying them to USB: > > # cp -a /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/* > /run/media/rgm/3153-B4EA/system-connections/ > cp: failed to preserve ownership for > '/run/media/rgm/3153-B4EA/system-connections/enp3s0.nmconnection': >

Re: F38 - QEMM image migration problem

On 5/1/23 05:53, Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 11:41 schrieb Peter Boy : … You use virus to dump the vm definition to a xml file, e.g. to your home dir, copy it to the new machine, adjust it (e.g. name of the interface) and create a new machine with virus using that definition file.

Re: F38 - QEMM image migration problem

> Am 01.05.2023 um 11:41 schrieb Peter Boy : > > … > > You use virus to dump the vm definition to a xml file, e.g. to your home dir, > copy it to the new machine, adjust it (e.g. name of the interface) and create > a new machine with virus using that definition file. This damn autocorrect:

Re: F38 - QEMM image migration problem

On 5/1/23 05:41, Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 11:26 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : On 5/1/23 05:06, Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 03:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : I have a Fedora21 image from my old F35 system that I rsnyced to my F38 system: # ls -ls /var/lib/libvirt/images/ total

Re: F38 - QEMM image migration problem

> Am 01.05.2023 um 11:26 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : > > > > On 5/1/23 05:06, Peter Boy wrote: >> >>> Am 01.05.2023 um 03:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : >>> >>> I have a Fedora21 image from my old F35 system that I rsnyced to my F38 >>> system: >>> >>> # ls -ls /var/lib/libvirt/images/ >>> t

Re: F38 - QEMM image migration problem

On 5/1/23 05:06, Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 03:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : I have a Fedora21 image from my old F35 system that I rsnyced to my F38 system: # ls -ls /var/lib/libvirt/images/ total 18397576 18397576 -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 18839109632 Apr 30 21:15 fedora21.qcow2 I th

Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

On 5/1/23 04:15, Peter Boy wrote: Am 01.05.2023 um 04:39 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : Is there a way to migrate the NetworkManager/system-connections files from F35 to F38 system? I am not finding an export option and haven't figured out how to get around file permissions to copy the file

Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

On 5/1/23 02:13, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:39 PM Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is there a way to migrate the NetworkManager/system-connections files from F35 to F38 system? I am not finding an export option and haven't figured out how to get around file permissions to copy t

Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

On 5/1/23 00:33, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/30/23 19:39, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Is there a way to migrate the NetworkManager/system-connections files from F35 to F38 system? I am not finding an export option and haven't figured out how to get around file permissions to copy the files to a USB

Re: F38 - QEMM image migration problem

> Am 01.05.2023 um 03:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : > > I have a Fedora21 image from my old F35 system that I rsnyced to my F38 > system: > > # ls -ls /var/lib/libvirt/images/ > total 18397576 > 18397576 -rw-r--r--. 1 qemu qemu 18839109632 Apr 30 21:15 fedora21.qcow2 > > I then went through t

Re: Broken browser? Or broken website...

> Am 30.04.2023 um 22:58 schrieb Dave Close : > > Accessing a page on , I am > presented with a banner reading, "Unfortunately, your browser is > unsupported. Please switch to a supported browser to view rich content, > log in and reply." I am unable to scr

Re: next update broke my bridge again

On 5/1/23 01:43, francis.montag...@inria.fr wrote: Hi. On Mon, 01 May 2023 00:22:38 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: nmcli device show br0 > /dev/nul Beware: /dev/null, not /dev/nul Opps Thank yo . vi to the rescue! if [ $? = 0 ]; then InternalNic=br0 else InternalNi

Re: next update broke my bridge again

Hi. On Mon, 01 May 2023 00:22:38 -0700 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > nmcli device show br0 > /dev/nul Beware: /dev/null, not /dev/nul > if [ $? = 0 ]; then > InternalNic=br0 > else > InternalNic=eno1 > fi > internal_addr=$(nmcli device show $InternalNic | grep -i > 'IP4.ADDRESS\

Re: problem downloading rpms with wifi

> Am 01.05.2023 um 02:49 schrieb Bill Cunningham : > > I just was able to install the fedora 38 build and I want to use dnf to > install so more rpms. I get this error and I have no idea where to begin. It > has to do with wifi networking I know that. using the gui I was able to > install fin

Re: F38 migrate NetworkManager/system-connections

> Am 01.05.2023 um 04:39 schrieb Robert Moskowitz : > > Is there a way to migrate the NetworkManager/system-connections files from > F35 to F38 system? > > I am not finding an export option and haven't figured out how to get around > file permissions to copy the files to a USB stick. > I

Re: next update broke my bridge again

On 4/30/23 23:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 4/30/23 23:32, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 4/30/23 23:24, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: # nmcli device DEVICE  TYPE  STATE    CONNECTION eno2    ethernet  connected    Wired connection 2 eno1    ethernet  unavailable  -- br0 bridge    unm