Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2023-02-18 18:35, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/18/23 18:31, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2023-02-18 17:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/18/23 16:59, Samuel Sieb wrote: lsof -i tcp:6556 Pretty! # lsof -i udp:3780 COMMAND    PID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME conntrack 561

Re: kitchen timer

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/16/23 14:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/8/23 00:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Anyone know of a kitchen timer that has an rpm in the repo? Many thanks, -T I gave up and bought a $15 wind up timer. At least I can hear it.  Well hear it rattle for 4 seconds.  It may hav

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/18/23 18:31, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 2023-02-18 17:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/18/23 16:59, Samuel Sieb wrote: lsof -i tcp:6556 Pretty! # lsof -i udp:3780 COMMAND    PID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME conntrack 5617 root    6u  IPv4  33770  0t0  UDP *:nnp I am

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2023-02-18 17:10, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/18/23 16:59, Samuel Sieb wrote: lsof -i tcp:6556 Pretty! # lsof -i udp:3780 COMMAND    PID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME conntrack 5617 root    6u  IPv4  33770  0t0  UDP *:nnp I am using iptables.  Do you think I can j

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/18/23 16:59, Samuel Sieb wrote: lsof -i tcp:6556 Pretty! # lsof -i udp:3780 COMMANDPID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME conntrack 5617 root6u IPv4 33770 0t0 UDP *:nnp I am using iptables. Do you think I can just remove conntrack? __

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/18/23 16:54, Tom Horsley wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 16:36:54 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: How do you get ss to tell you the program name? That's what running as root and using the -p option is supposed to do. On my system for instance, I see this: sudo ss -l -p -n | fgrep 22 one

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 2023-02-18 16:36, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/18/23 16:22, Tom Horsley wrote: "sudo ss -l -p -n | fgrep 3780" tcp   LISTEN 0   4096 *:6566 How do you get ss to tell you the program name? lsof -i tcp:6556 ___ users mailing list -

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 16:36:54 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > How do you get ss to tell you the program name? That's what running as root and using the -p option is supposed to do. On my system for instance, I see this: sudo ss -l -p -n | fgrep 22 one of the lines that appears is: tcp L

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/18/23 16:22, Tom Horsley wrote: "sudo ss -l -p -n | fgrep 3780" tcp LISTEN 0 4096 *:6566 How do you get ss to tell you the program name? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/18/23 16:22, Tom Horsley wrote: On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:49:16 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Who would be trying to write to that? Try "sudo ss -l -p -n | fgrep 3780" that might tell you what program is listening on port 3780 (if any) then you could use rpm -q -i -f /program/name to

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 15:49:16 -0800 ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > Who would be trying to write to that? Try "sudo ss -l -p -n | fgrep 3780" that might tell you what program is listening on port 3780 (if any) then you could use rpm -q -i -f /program/name to see what the heck it is. __

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/18/23 15:47, Doug Herr wrote: On Sat, Feb 18, 2023, at 2:44 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2/17/23 17:22, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fc37 What is this all about (iptables)? Feb 17 17:17:36 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 SRC=192.168.250.10 DST=225.0.0.5

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread Doug Herr
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023, at 2:44 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 2/17/23 17:22, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Fc37 >> >> What is this all about (iptables)? >> >> Feb 17 17:17:36 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 >> SRC=192.168.250.10 DST=225.0.0.50 LEN=36 TOS

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/17/23 17:22, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Fc37 What is this all about (iptables)? Feb 17 17:17:36 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 SRC=192.168.250.10 DST=225.0.0.50 LEN=36 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 ID=30677 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=33445 DPT=3780 LEN=16 over and over

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread ToddAndMargo via users
On 2/18/23 07:53, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:22 PM ToddAndMargo via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Hi All, Fc37 What is this all about (iptables)? Feb 17 17:17:36 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 SRC=192.168.

Re: clang compile error with latest kernel

2023-02-18 Thread Michael Hennebry
On Sat, 18 Feb 2023, Barry Scott wrote: On 16 Feb 2023, at 18:42, Jeffrey Walton wrote: I think some of the kernel devs are the biggest problem. Some of the developers feel GCC is the only compiler to support. They rely on GCC-isms, and don't care about things like undefined behavior since

update conflits

2023-02-18 Thread Patrick Dupre
Hello, Now for a certain time, I get the following message. Should I try to force the update? Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): lua-libs x86_64 5.4.4-1.fc36 fedora 217 k lua-libs

Re: port 3780 UDP?

2023-02-18 Thread George N. White III
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:22 PM ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > Fc37 > > What is this all about (iptables)? > > Feb 17 17:17:36 rn6 kernel: dsl-out Everything Else IN= OUT=eno2 > SRC=192.168.250.10 DST=225.0.0.50 LEN=36 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=1 > ID=306

Re: kitchen timer

2023-02-18 Thread George N. White III
On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 4:09 AM Tim via users wrote: > On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 16:51 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > It is the better part of wisdom to realize when > > computers are not the proper tool for the job. > > > > I hope this catches up to the cloud soon. Somethings > > are grea

Re: clang compile error with latest kernel

2023-02-18 Thread Barry Scott
> On 16 Feb 2023, at 18:42, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > I think some of the kernel devs are the biggest problem. Some of the > developers feel GCC is the only compiler to support. They rely on > GCC-isms, and don't care about things like undefined behavior since it > "works for me using GCC." I'v

Re: kitchen timer

2023-02-18 Thread Tim via users
On Fri, 2023-02-17 at 16:51 -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > It is the better part of wisdom to realize when > computers are not the proper tool for the job. > > I hope this catches up to the cloud soon. Somethings > are great on the cloud; others are better on the > edge. And I am seeing