Hi all,
I just found the best explanation of the linux graphics system ever. It
covers the history of Xorg, X11, and Wayland, and explains why Wayland
is the future. Ironically, the future is always in the future...
As informative as they come.
It's a youtube. add this to the URL: /watch?
On Thu, 2022-10-27 at 23:09 +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> 2: Does anyone understand what happened according to the message
> attached below from postmas...@outlook.com
I saw the message in question, it came through yesterday. My guess is
that it's not your problem, but Gmail's. I've seen
On 10/27/22 16:01, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:17:31PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
This is the problem. The server either doesn't like the SPF policy or
the received message fails the SPF policy. Maybe the mailing list
admins will have to add gmx.net to the list of hidden
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:17:31PM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/27/22 15:11, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Received: from pop.gmx.net [212.227.17.185]
by aw17 with POP3 (fetchmail-6.4.31)
for <[deleted local user name]@localhost> (single-drop); Wed,
26 Oct 2022 20:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Receiv
On 10/27/22 15:11, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Received: from pop.gmx.net [212.227.17.185]
by aw17 with POP3 (fetchmail-6.4.31)
for <[deleted local user name]@localhost> (single-drop); Wed, 26
Oct 2022 20:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUR04-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
([4
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:31:32PM +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
You will find the crux here:
Generating server: PR3P189MB1017.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
y.antoniowat...@gmail.com
Remote Server returned '550-5.7.26 The MAIL FROM domain [gmx.net] has an SPF
record with a hard fail 550-5.7.26 policy (-
> Am 27.10.2022 um 23:38 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer :
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:09:35PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>> The error message below, that was sent to me after sending an email to
>> this list (via relay=mail.gmx.net. [212.227.17.190] - the message
>
> wrong: IP should say
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:09:35PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
The error message below, that was sent to me after sending an email to
this list (via relay=mail.gmx.net. [212.227.17.190] - the message
wrong: IP should say [212.227.17.168]
itself can be seen at the very end of the forwarde
You will find the crux here:
> Generating server: PR3P189MB1017.EURP189.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
>
> y.antoniowat...@gmail.com
> Remote Server returned '550-5.7.26 The MAIL FROM domain [gmx.net] has an SPF
> record with a hard fail 550-5.7.26 policy (-all)
That means, a participating server checks, if
TL;DR:
Emails I'm sending to this list take many hours until they reach this
list. Main problem 'tho is that shortly after sending them I'm getting
an error message from postmas...@outlook.com telling me about
unspecified errors regarding the mail transport. The message for this
is attached with t
On 27Oct2022 11:18, fs 3000 wrote:
I keep getting mails from arm@ no matter what i do. I have tried
sending mail to arm-leave@, it says i'm not a member. I went to the
page and unsubscribed from there, nothing works. Any idea?
Maybe you're subscribed under a different address. Examine the Rec
I keep getting mails from arm@ no matter what i do. I have tried sending mail
to arm-leave@, it says i'm not a member. I went to the page and unsubscribed
from there, nothing works. Any idea?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
lsinitrd | grep amdgpu
and same with the name of the firmware.
If the module is there and the firmware is not then the module would
load and the firmware would not exist so cannot load.
The firmware gets loaded or not when the module loads.
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 1:08 AM Felix Miata wrote:
>
>
We are trying to implement 802.1x on our Fedora-Workstations (36, latest
updates) for both, the workstation itself and a
Windows KVM Guest. Therefor we created a linux bridge with the physical and
virtual device as members. The virtual kvm
guest has been configured to use the br0 within kvm. To m
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:19 -0600, Joe Zeff wrote:
> Note that you don't have to use a .txt extension for that file.
I know. I started off personal computing on Amigas, where filename
suffixes weren't part of the file type determination. Other than raw
plain text, every file had identifiers in t
15 matches
Mail list logo
