On 10/22/21 19:02, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-10-22 15:42, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/22/21 15:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
is news to you.
is NOT news to you
That typo came out a bit insulting. Sorry.
Actually, there was no typo. You wrote it correctly the first time. :-)
"
Roger Heflin
>> LVM is also used to make separate LV's such that critical
>> filesystems can have their own space and be protected against
>> another filesystem filling up (if you only had a single
>> filesystem).
Jonathan Billings:
> While you can do this with separate partitions with file sys
On 2021-10-22 15:42, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/22/21 15:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
is news to you.
is NOT news to you
That typo came out a bit insulting. Sorry.
Actually, there was no typo. You wrote it correctly the first time. :-)
"I am sure nothing I have said here is n
On 10/22/21 15:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
is news to you.
is NOT news to you
That typo came out a bit insulting. Sorry.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 18:11, Roger Heflin wrote:
> there are only like 2-3 ways to get it not activated on boot..
>
> This is a misconfig of some sort, not random breakage (unless it is metad).
>
> cat /proc/cmdline
> disable/mask lvm2-lvmetad if your fedora version has it, it causes weird
> lvm
On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 13:02 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 10/22/21 09:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Problem Report.
>
>
> PR stands for "pull request", which is terminology that comes from
> the
> use of git. When someone suggests that you send a PR, they're
> suggesting that you chec
On 10/22/21 10:27, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/22/21 12:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Yeah, once again one has to "pull teeth" to learn of the environment.
Back when I was doing telephone tech support, I had to talk to customers
who wanted me to help but were very reluctant to give me the information
I
there are only like 2-3 ways to get it not activated on boot..
This is a misconfig of some sort, not random breakage (unless it is metad).
cat /proc/cmdline
disable/mask lvm2-lvmetad if your fedora version has it, it causes weird
lvm issues (ie random fail to find/enable vgs).
Did "vgchange -ay"
On 10/22/21 09:40, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Problem Report.
PR stands for "pull request", which is terminology that comes from the
use of git. When someone suggests that you send a PR, they're
suggesting that you check out the git repo, make the changes you think
are appropriate, commit
On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:02:29PM -0400, John Mellor wrote:
> Yup, but btrfs and zfs also do the same thing, except more elegantly. One
> thing that btrfs does NOT do only on Fedora at this time is fs encryption,
> which is super useful on a laptop. I'm unsure why Fedora is still using the
> clun
On 2021-10-22 1:14 p.m., Roger Heflin wrote:
LVM is also used to make separate LV's such that critical filesystems
can have their own space and be protected against another filesystem
filling up (if you only had a single filesystem).
. . .
Yup, but btrfs and zfs also do the same thing, exc
John Mellor wrote:
>Anyway you cut this, even if you get the problem fixed, you can no
>longer trust that this machine is sane. You have suffered some kind of
>critical corruption, and who knows if you've corrected it or whether
>there is more undiscovered damage or loss. ...
Yep, I've come to
Roger Heflin wrote:
>run "systemd-analyze critical-chain home.mount" and it will show you the
>requirements.
>And if you find a dependency not working run at "systemctl status "
>against it, and that should show you what error it got.
# systemd-analyze critical-chain home.mount
home.mount @2mi
On Oct 22, 2021, at 13:16, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
> LVM is also used to make separate LV's such that critical filesystems can
> have their own space and be protected against another filesystem filling up
> (if you only had a single filesystem).
>
> There are reasons to use it, especially if you
Thank you,
Regards.
Dorian Rosse.
From: Patrick O'Callaghan
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2021 6:40:22 PM
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Does the program llvm break all the hardware or only some of it ?
On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 06:53 +, Dorian ROS
On 10/22/21 12:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Yeah, once again one has to "pull teeth" to learn of the environment.
Back when I was doing telephone tech support, I had to talk to customers
who wanted me to help but were very reluctant to give me the information
I needed in order to help them. I us
LVM is also used to make separate LV's such that critical filesystems can
have their own space and be protected against another filesystem filling up
(if you only had a single filesystem).
There are reasons to use it, especially if you don't want filling up a
/data only filesystem to impact the OS
On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 06:53 +, Dorian ROSSE wrote:
> Matthew : what is a PR please ?
>
Problem Report.
poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Co
On Fri, 2021-10-22 at 09:09 -0400, John Mellor wrote:
> Maybe moving up to a less complex storage system with built-in volume
> and raid management and dynamic error detection/correction (like
> btrfs or zfs) would also be a better move at this point.
I've always queried the point of using LVM by
(top-posted due to the length of this thread)
Anyway you cut this, even if you get the problem fixed, you can no
longer trust that this machine is sane. You have suffered some kind of
critical corruption, and who knows if you've corrected it or whether
there is more undiscovered damage or loss
run "systemd-analyze critical-chain home.mount" and it will show you the
requirements.
I would suspect something going wrong with the activation of the home lv.
On boot up do a "lvs" post that info. The Attr column will show if it is
activated or not.
And if you find a dependency not working
On Oct 21, 2021, at 19:47, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> On 10/21/21 5:24 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> That’s unlikely to help. Most likely there will be no Linux support there.
>
> I'm not sure that it's Linux specific. Does the OP get thumbnails when his
> phone is connected to a Windows machine?
On 10/22/21 00:41, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:> I just remembered two setting
commented out
> in the ini file:
>
> tcp_send_buffer_bytes=32768
> tcp_recv_buffer_bytes=32768
>
> I wounder is doubling or quadrupling them would help?
I just quadrupled those two. I made a noticeable
difference.
On 10/22/21 00:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Then the answer is most likely that you can't, other than maybe fiddling
a bit with the protocol parameters.
That is what I was afraid of. You know an fiddling
that might help?
___
users mailing list -- users@lis
On 10/22/21 00:04, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-10-21 20:20, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 32
xrdp-0.9.16-1.fc32.x86_64
Is there any trick to speeding up and xrdp server?
I can watch the pages paint. Windows machines
on the same network with RDP server set up are
twice a fast. AND THAT I
On 2021-10-22 00:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/21/21 23:57, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 22/10/2021 14:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-10-21 22:19, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/21/21 22:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-10-21 20:20, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 32
xrdp-0.9.16-1.
On 10/21/21 23:57, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 22/10/2021 14:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-10-21 22:19, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/21/21 22:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2021-10-21 20:20, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 32
xrdp-0.9.16-1.fc32.x86_64
Is there any trick to speeding up and x
On 2021-10-21 20:20, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Fedora 32
xrdp-0.9.16-1.fc32.x86_64
Is there any trick to speeding up and xrdp server?
I can watch the pages paint. Windows machines
on the same network with RDP server set up are
twice a fast. AND THAT IS NOT RIGHT!
Sorry, I misread that.
28 matches
Mail list logo
