Matthew Miller wrote:
> GPG's concept of trust is ... well-meaning, but not user friendly. You can
> trust the key you just imported because you just downloaded it from the
> official Fedora website via https. GPG, however, does not know that. So, it
> gives this error. You can use the `gpg --edit-
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 15:31, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:52:51AM -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > The verification fails with this message:
> > $ gpg --verify-files *-CHECKSUM
> > gpg: Signature made Fri 23 Oct 2020 08:09:07 AM PDT
> > gpg:using RSA key
>
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:52:51AM -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> The verification fails with this message:
> $ gpg --verify-files *-CHECKSUM
> gpg: Signature made Fri 23 Oct 2020 08:09:07 AM PDT
> gpg: using RSA key
> 963A2BEB02009608FE67EA4249FD77499570FF31
> gpg: Good signature
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 12:54, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> I have downloaded the Fedora-33 KDE spin and am attempting to verify it.
> Following the instructions (appended below for convenience) I have:
>
>- Imported the keys using curl (where do they go?) and
>- Verified the CHECKSUM file us
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:57 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> >> You may want to ask on the "test" list as well as adding a comment to
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906086
> >>
> > Slight correction: please don't comment on that bug. It would be
> > better to file a new bug that blocks
On 11/02/2021 22:54, Ben Cotton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:59 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
You may want to ask on the "test" list as well as adding a comment to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906086
Slight correction: please don't comment on that bug. It would be
better to file a
I have downloaded the Fedora-33 KDE spin and am attempting to verify
it. Following the instructions (appended below for convenience) I
have:
* Imported the keys using curl (where do they go?) and
* Verified the CHECKSUM file using gpg
The verification fails with this message:
$ gpg --verify-fil
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 8:59 AM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> You may want to ask on the "test" list as well as adding a comment to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906086
>
Slight correction: please don't comment on that bug. It would be
better to file a new bug that blocks 1906086.
--
Be
On 11/02/2021 21:36, Paul Smith wrote:
Dear All,
I have installed pipewire-pulseaudio with:
dnf --allowerasing install pipewire-pulseaudio
And now, the microphone is not detected. Any ideas? Is pipewire
already at an usable stage of development?
My understanding is that the target release i
Dear All,
I have installed pipewire-pulseaudio with:
dnf --allowerasing install pipewire-pulseaudio
And now, the microphone is not detected. Any ideas? Is pipewire
already at an usable stage of development?
Thanks in advance,
Paul
___
users mailing
10 matches
Mail list logo
