On 5/25/20 5:40 PM, None via users wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 25, 2020 7:58 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/25/20 12:08 PM, None via users wrote:
Thank you. I see what you mean. I have checked and see here
http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/60969.html
Still I won
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 15:52 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/25/20 2:52 PM, hw wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 10:55 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> > > Why do you think this is a fedora or even wayland question?
> >
> > Do you think it is not?
>
> Fedora does not distribute NVidia drivers. You
On 5/25/20 5:23 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Yes, I understand that. I still think the behaviour of mdadm in this
case is counter-intuitive. When I explicitly ask for the creation of an
array called /dev/md0 and the command first of all warns me that this
will (not "may") destroy the existing p
On 2020-05-26 08:17, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> Previously, when I run firewall-cmd --list-all or any firewalld
> commands as a regular user it will failed, with authorization failure.
> Today I noticed that if I run firewall-cmd --list-all I can see the
> rules; however, I am not able to modify the fir
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 25, 2020 7:58 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/25/20 12:08 PM, None via users wrote:
>
> > Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
> > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Dear All,
Previously, when I run firewall-cmd --list-all or any firewalld
commands as a regular user it will failed, with authorization failure.
Today I noticed that if I run firewall-cmd --list-all I can see the
rules; however, I am not able to modify the firewall rules without a
superuser privil
On 5/25/20 2:52 PM, hw wrote:
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 10:55 -0700, stan via users wrote:
Why do you think this is a fedora or even wayland question?
Do you think it is not?
Fedora does not distribute NVidia drivers. You got them from a third
party. They are not "supported" except maybe by t
On 5/25/20 2:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/25/20 2:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
So although the above message says the exis
On Tue, 2020-05-26 at 05:42 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-05-26 00:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I still ended up with /dev/md127p1 as before, and /dev/md0 wa's not
> > created.
>
> I didn't think you would. As I mentioned in another post, you didn't start
> out with a "fresh" drive.
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 10:55 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 19:32:02 +0200
> hw wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > what is the current status of wayland
On 2020-05-26 00:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I still ended up with /dev/md127p1 as before, and /dev/md0 wa's not
> created.
I didn't think you would. As I mentioned in another post, you didn't start out
with a "fresh" drive. It already
had info on it that mdadm had created and then just re
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/25/20 2:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > > So although the above message says the existing partition table will b
All;
I just ordered this printer:
Epson SureColor P900 17" Photo Printer
Any thoughts on where I can get a driver for it to print large photos?
Or even the driver for it's predecessor the P800?
Thanks
in advance
--
`When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just
On 5/25/20 12:08 PM, None via users wrote:
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 25, 2020 5:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/25/20 3:12 AM, None via users wrote:
I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 25, 2020 5:38 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/25/20 3:12 AM, None via users wrote:
>
> > I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc solution. A
> > website does give 3 as
On 5/25/20 2:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
So although the above message says the existing partition table will be
lost, for some reason I'm still getting a partition, while you
apparently
On Mon, 25 May 2020 19:32:02 +0200
hw wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in
> > > Fedora 32?
> >
> > This is meaningless witho
On 5/25/20 3:12 AM, None via users wrote:
I have heard of R but I am looking for awk/bash, bc or dc solution. A website
does give 3 as q3 instead of 2.75. Please see below
I realize that, but I'm saying that datamash and R are also correct.
They use the calculation method instead of the spli
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 11:03 -0300, George N. White III wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in Fedora 32?
> >
>
> This is meaningless without mentioning the hardware you want to use.
> Older hardware is not
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 06:24 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> In fairness to systemd, it has never been possible to edit /etc/fstab and
> have your changes automatically applied. It has always been necessary to
> run some sort of mount command (or reboot) after modifying fstab.
Which is what I thought I
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 07:49 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> His issue was he did the manual mount on /raid (already in fstab with
>
> a different device) and systemd immediately unmounted it. The mount
>
> succeeds with no error, and the umount happens so fast you are left
>
> confused about what
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 06:24 -0600, Greg Woods wrote:
> I would guess that keeping an eye on dozens of config files to see if
> any of them have changed would use a lot of system resources over
> time, but I expect there are more serious and less obvious reasons
> why this is not done.
On a gigaHer
On Sun, 24 May 2020, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I tried adding nomodeset grub_gfxmode=1440x900 ,
but still got 640x480 .
cat cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz initrd=initrd.img root=live:CDLABEL=Fedora-WS-Live-32-1-6
rd.live.image nomodeset grub_gfxmode=1440x900
[liveuser@localhost-live proc]$ xrandr
Gonvert and umit (nmap frontend) are no longer available in F32. Any
replacements?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapr
On 2020-05-25 21:52, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 20:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-05-25 20:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote:
> On 6th May an update to selinux-
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 10:33, hw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in Fedora 32?
>
This is meaningless without mentioning the hardware you want to use.
Older hardware is not supported by nvidia drivers, but does work using
nouveau.
> Some search resul
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 20:35 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-05-25 20:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32)
> > > >
Hi,
what is the current status of wayland with nvidia drivers in Fedora 32?
Some search results seem to indicate that it's supposed to work by default.
Others indicate that it still doesn't work. The actual result is that it
does not work unless I use the nouveau driver instead. Unfortunately,
His issue was he did the manual mount on /raid (already in fstab with
a different device) and systemd immediately unmounted it. The mount
succeeds with no error, and the umount happens so fast you are left
confused about what is going on.It did at least note it in
messages so long as you can g
On 2020-05-25 20:20, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote:
>>
>>> On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32)
>>> caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over
>>>
I had a bug submitted on a RHEL contract 2-3 years ago about it. I
get emails each quarter saying they are still evaluating it. I am not
holding my breath.
The reload could have bad effects since it might shuffle things around
if fstab changed that really only could happen on a reboot, the only
On Mon, May 25, 2020, 3:29 AM Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> I wonder why systemd doesn't notice
> that the file has changed and reload accordingly.
>
The obvious as stupid answer is because it is not designed to work that
way. The process is actually documented; see for example
systemd-fstab-gene
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 09:58 +, Mukesh Singal wrote:
> Home relocation isn’t a cup of coffee that you would take out easily.
> Instead, it’s a hell lot of tougher tasks you might have ever gone through!
> It involves a lot of activities that need perfect planning and execution. You
> can’t mo
On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote:
>
> > On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32)
> > caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over
> > twelve hours. I was not happy.
>
>
> Thanks for
On Sun, 24 May 2020 at 21:35, None via users
wrote:
> Dear fellow fedora users,
>
> If I have a data file called 15.dat with the following content:
>
> $ cat 15.dat
> 1
> 3
> 1
> 0
> 2
>
> And I want to find min, quartile 1, median, quartile 3 and maximum (Five
> number summary)
> We can use data
Sent from ProtonMail, encrypted email based in Switzerland.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 25, 2020 3:01 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/24/20 5:34 PM, None via users wrote:
>
> > Dear fellow fedora users,
> > If I have a data file called 15.dat with the following content:
> >
Home relocation isn’t a cup of coffee that you would take out easily. Instead,
it’s a hell lot of tougher tasks you might have ever gone through! It involves
a lot of activities that need perfect planning and execution. You can’t move to
and from Mumbai on your own. And if you would, you may fac
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 18:07 -0500, Roger Heflin wrote:
> Did you originally have /dev/md0p1 in fstab and you have edited fstab
>
> since you booted?
>
>
>
> If so the great and amazing systemd will not be amused and will still
>
> have a job for the old device, you will need to run systemctl
>
On Sun, 2020-05-24 at 16:22 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 5/24/20 3:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > So although the above message says the existing partition table will be
> > lost, for some reason I'm still getting a partition, while you
> > apparently didn't. I copied the --create comma
On 2020-05-25 15:36, Ron Yorston wrote:
> On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32)
> caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over
> twelve hours. I was not happy.
Thanks for the Heads-UP. I suppose we'll soon find out how many people didn't
re
Joe Zeff:
>> And for those of us who don't use Gnome? There are two folders of
>> that name in different places: /etc/X11 and /usr/share/X11 so which
>> one do I look in?
Samuel Sieb:
> I wasn't aware of that /usr/share one, but local modifications are
> supposed to go in /etc. /usr/share/ is f
On 6th May an update to selinux-policy for Fedora 32 (3.14.5-38.fc32)
caused all filesystems to be relabelled. In my case this took over
twelve hours. I was not happy.
It appears the developers have a workaround for the problem but the
update that applies it will cause all filesystems to be rela
42 matches
Mail list logo
