On 2/3/20 7:11 PM, Dave Ulrick wrote:
If this is a Linux kernel issue, it would have to have been introduced
several kernel releases ago because if I boot into the PC's oldest
kernel, 5.4.10-100.fc30.x86_64, I still suffer from the slower outgoing
throughput. So, either this issue began with a
The BZ looks somewhat similar to my issue--same chipset, etc.--but I
notice a couple of differences:
1. I'm not seeing any errors on the interface:
# ifconfig enp3s0
enp3s0: flags=4163 mtu 1500
inet 192.168.4.6 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.4.255
inet6 fe80::7c0a:45
On 2020-02-04 11:11, Dave Ulrick wrote:
> I am experiencing just one minor issue having to do with throughput on the
> PC's built-in Ethernet interface:
Sounds as if it may be this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797232
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions
I'm running Fedora 30 on a somewhat older PC:
$ uname -a
Linux pc.localdomain 5.4.14-100.fc30.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 23 13:19:57
UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I am experiencing just one minor issue having to do with throughput on
the PC's built-in Ethernet interface:
# lspci -v -s
On 2/3/20 6:59 PM, sean darcy wrote:
syslog has this every 10 seconds:
audit[1039229]: AVC avc: denied { read } for pid=1039229 comm="rpm"
name="Providename" dev="dm-1" ino=2622531
scontext=system_u:system_r:setroubleshootd_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:var_lib_t:s0 tclass=file permi
syslog has this every 10 seconds:
audit[1039229]: AVC avc: denied { read } for pid=1039229 comm="rpm"
name="Providename" dev="dm-1" ino=2622531
scontext=system_u:system_r:setroubleshootd_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:var_lib_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
setroubleshootd[1036631]: erro
On 2/3/20 4:52 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
On 20-02-03 17:56:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
...
$ sudo pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda3 fedora_localhost-live lvm2 a-- <128.00g <17.80g
/dev/sda4 fedora_localhost-live lvm2 a-- <16.00g <16.00g
$
...
On 1/2/20 19:50, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-02-01 08:51, Stephen Morris wrote:
Hi Ed, just further to this, you might be right in saying that it could be the
vmware driver not properly supporting Wayland. I have a vm with Mageia
installed in it, and if I connect to Gnome on Wayland in that vm I
On 2/3/20 2:56 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 12:17 -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
Some quick notes about lvm. The essence of LVM is the volume group
(VG). Volume groups contain logical volumes (LV). Volume groups are
defined by specifying the raw devices, the physical volume
On 20-02-03 17:56:59, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
...
$ sudo pvs
PV VGFmt Attr PSizePFree
/dev/sda3 fedora_localhost-live lvm2 a-- <128.00g <17.80g
/dev/sda4 fedora_localhost-live lvm2 a-- <16.00g <16.00g
$
...
It's very unusual to have two partition
On 20-02-03 16:23:07, Mike Wright wrote:
...
I am befuddled. Here is my sudoers file:
Defaultsenv_reset
Defaultsmail_badpass
Defaultssecure_path=
Cmnd_Alias LXC=/usr/bin/lxc
rootALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL
mikeALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:LXC
%admin ALL=(ALL) ALL
%sudo ALL=(AL
On 2020-02-04 06:56, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It wouldn't surprise me. How can I unravel this (short of a complete
> reinstallation)? I'm not enamoured of LVM and would be quite happy to
> revert to basic partitioning, but if that isn't feasible I'm willing to
> move forward to LVM-only if that
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 12:17 -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
> Some quick notes about lvm. The essence of LVM is the volume group
> (VG). Volume groups contain logical volumes (LV). Volume groups are
> defined by specifying the raw devices, the physical volumes (PV), that
> provide the storage. In
On 2/3/20 12:34 PM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 23:27 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
The format of that rule looks fine to me. You might look in
the logs (/var/log/secure if you've got syslog enabled, else
use the journalctl command).
It may be that you're hitting another rule whic
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 23:27 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The format of that rule looks fine to me. You might look in
>
> the logs (/var/log/secure if you've got syslog enabled, else
>
> use the journalctl command).
>
>
>
> It may be that you're hitting another rule which supercedes
>
> the
On 2/3/20 8:52 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-02-03 19:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 07:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-02-03 06:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 03:41 +0800, Ed Greshko
I may be missing something here, but here's what I understand
The system is mounting /dev/sda5 as /home, using the UUID of the file
system on /dev/sda5, as specified in /etc/fstab.
*Something* is wanting something else that it somehow knows is located
on LV fedora_localhost--live-home. What
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-02-03 19:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 07:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 2020-02-03 06:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 03:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > > > On 2020-02-03
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 08:04 -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
> > Neither does the name (two dashes instead of one, as you noted in
> > another reply) so I'm not sure what's going on here.
>
> The "two dashes thing" is an artifact of the device mapper (/dev/mapper)
> which creates symlinks to the physica
On Sat, 01 Feb 2020 21:15:17 -
Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> How can I fix this error?
>
> [root@desk mythcat]# dmesg --level=err,warn
> [0.264718] pmd_set_huge: Cannot satisfy [mem
> 0xf400-0xf420] with a huge-page mapping due to MTRR override.
> [0.265132] ENERGY_PERF_BIA
On 2/3/20 5:01 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 12:29 +0100, sixpack13 wrote:
On 03.02.20 12:15, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 15:40 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/02/2020 03:25 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'll bear it in mind, but given that this is /h
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 12:29 +0100, sixpack13 wrote:
> On 03.02.20 12:15, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 15:40 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> > > On 02/02/2020 03:25 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > I'll bear it in mind, but given that this is /home, it should be
> > > > mounte
On 03.02.20 12:15, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 15:40 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/02/2020 03:25 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'll bear it in mind, but given that this is /home, it should be
mounted anyway (and in fact it is, see my reply to Ed).
Yes, I understand that,
On 03.02.20 12:04, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 16:16 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020, 3:42 PM Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/02/2020 03:25 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'll bear it in mind, but given that this is /home, it should be
mounted anyway (and in f
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:11 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-02-03 19:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 07:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 2020-02-03 06:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 03:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > > > On 2020-02-03
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 15:40 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 02/02/2020 03:25 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I'll bear it in mind, but given that this is /home, it should be
> > mounted anyway (and in fact it is, see my reply to Ed).
>
> Yes, I understand that, but I'm not clear if the partition yo
On 2020-02-03 19:06, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 07:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-02-03 06:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 03:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-02-03 02:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> No, the login appears to work
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 07:12 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> I don't know why it should be neededbut this may provide a workaround?
>
> https://www.dynacont.net/documentation/linux/udisks2_polkit_Allow_unauthenticated_mounting/
Interesting, though I would have thought that /home would be mounted by
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 07:03 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 2020-02-03 06:24, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 03:41 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > > On 2020-02-03 02:27, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > > No, the login appears to work, but always shows this pop-up.
> > > > Neverthe
On Sun, 2020-02-02 at 16:16 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2020, 3:42 PM Joe Zeff wrote:
>
> > On 02/02/2020 03:25 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > I'll bear it in mind, but given that this is /home, it should be
> > > mounted anyway (and in fact it is, see my reply to Ed).
30 matches
Mail list logo
