On 10/9/19 8:53 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Actually I did manage to get a laptop, from linuxlaptops, with a
spinning HD this year. They do still exist.
That's not what I meant. Almost all laptops still come with spinning
drives, but I've been replacing them with SSDs. The laptop drives are
Didn't think to check it...but I will and will post the results here.
FWIWthe stocks are 8GB each...DDR 3...1600Mhz...
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019, 12:58 AM fedora wrote:
> Did you check to see if the new RAM has been accepted by the system?
>
> vmstat, top?
>
> suomi
>
> On 10/10/2019 05.52, Eddie
Did you check to see if the new RAM has been accepted by the system?
vmstat, top?
suomi
On 10/10/2019 05.52, Eddie O'Connor wrote:
So, after upgrading the RAM in my Lenovo ThinkPad T-420 I thought I'd
get faster performance. But even with two 8GB sticks?it's running
even SLOWER?! Is there
On 10/10/19 11:53 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And Nvidia's proprietary driver is another thing I'd rather not deal with. it
seems that most vendors ship new Nvidia chipsets that x.org lists as not
supported.
May I ask where that list is located?
--
If simple questions can be answered with a s
Samuel Sieb writes:
On 10/9/19 7:08 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
My C++ compiles are getting longer. It's time to get new hardware, but I'm
having some difficulty finding Fedora-friendly hardware, that's slightly
above average grade, such as dual CPU and spinning rust (I haven't gotten
quite
So, after upgrading the RAM in my Lenovo ThinkPad T-420 I thought I'd get
faster performance. But even with two 8GB sticks?it's running even
SLOWER?! Is there something I've done wrong? It's got a 320GB 7200RPM hard
driveand it's running F30. Funny thing is? .before the upgrade it
had j
On 10/9/19 7:08 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
My C++ compiles are getting longer. It's time to get new hardware, but
I'm having some difficulty finding Fedora-friendly hardware, that's
slightly above average grade, such as dual CPU and spinning rust (I
haven't gotten quite aboard the SSD train, wi
My C++ compiles are getting longer. It's time to get new hardware, but I'm
having some difficulty finding Fedora-friendly hardware, that's slightly
above average grade, such as dual CPU and spinning rust (I haven't gotten
quite aboard the SSD train, with its built-in expiration date).
Tips
On 10/10/19 2:50 AM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
What is net.core.netdev_rss_key?
Can be this default setting an insecure issue?
You can see it with this command:
[root@desk mythcat]# sysctl -a --pattern 'net.core.netdev_rss_key'
netdev_rss_key
--
RSS (Receive Side Scaling) enabl
On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 18:55 +, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
> you have 2.070s (firmware) + 5.323s (loader) why ?
> my output is this:
> Startup finished in 2.902s (kernel) + 4.839s (initrd) + 31.351s (userspace) =
> 39.093s
> multi-user.target reached after 29.356s in userspace
If you repl
Tim:
I am running Centos 7 and have weirdness with my HP printer. My original
printer, which worked single and double sided perfectly with the
pre-installed hplip, died and I had to get a new printer whose driver
was unknown to hplip on Centos 7. I am away from my system so I have to
rely on
On 10/9/19 9:55 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote:
you have 2.070s (firmware) + 5.323s (loader) why ?
uefi system
on my legacy desktop appears like yours (i have 8s in nut-driver) :
root@hal: ~ # systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 1.346s (kernel) + 1.245s (initrd) + 11.026s
(userspace) = 13.6
you have 2.070s (firmware) + 5.323s (loader) why ?
my output is this:
Startup finished in 2.902s (kernel) + 4.839s (initrd) + 31.351s (userspace) =
39.093s
multi-user.target reached after 29.356s in userspace
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedo
What is net.core.netdev_rss_key?
Can be this default setting an insecure issue?
You can see it with this command:
[root@desk mythcat]# sysctl -a --pattern 'net.core.netdev_rss_key'
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
Hi,
I have a LAN using CentOS and Fedora installations (currently its
CentOS 7 on the server). At times it insists on doing double-sided
printing, and will not let me choose single-side. Erratically the
option is either unavailable (the drop down menu is not clickable, and
says "not available");
Hi! Does anyone have any idea why there is such situation:
[root@localhost ~]# systemd-analyze blame | grep tables
1.463s ip6tables.service
217ms iptables.service
This is on a new nvme laptop but the same behavior is present on any
other systems that i have (but annoying on
16 matches
Mail list logo
