Re: F30: latest kernel no external monitor

2019-08-19 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 8/19/19 4:54 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: If you point me on how to get related log lines in journal in both working and not working configurations, I can get more info. Seen on several threads that with Xwayland and gnome-shell not so easy to see startup log files... Shouldn't make any diffe

Re: List all packages which have a build requirement on package foo

2019-08-19 Thread Todd Zullinger
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:47:20PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: >> If you enable the '-source' repositories, you'll be able to >> do this with `dnf repoquery`. Something like this, I >> believe: >> >> dnf repoquery --disablerepo '*' --enablerepo '*-source'

Re: List all packages which have a build requirement on package foo

2019-08-19 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:47:20PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Hi, > > Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > How can I list all packages which have a *build* requirement on package > > foo? AFAIK build requirements are not stored as meta data in RPM files. > > Thus, repoquery won't help. The o

Re: Error starting domain: Requested operation is not valid: network 'default' is not active

2019-08-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 20:12 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 8/19/19 6:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > Did that and the problem has magically disappeared. No AVCs were > > reported, though I did relabel after turning SElinux back on. > > > > Curiously, I now see: > > > > $ virsh net-list --all

Re: List all packages which have a build requirement on package foo

2019-08-19 Thread Todd Zullinger
Hi, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > How can I list all packages which have a *build* requirement on package > foo? AFAIK build requirements are not stored as meta data in RPM files. > Thus, repoquery won't help. The only option I am aware of would be to > download all SPEC files and search fo

List all packages which have a build requirement on package foo

2019-08-19 Thread Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Hi all, How can I list all packages which have a *build* requirement on package foo? AFAIK build requirements are not stored as meta data in RPM files. Thus, repoquery won't help. The only option I am aware of would be to download all SPEC files and search for build requirements manually. Any othe

Re: Error starting domain: Requested operation is not valid: network 'default' is not active

2019-08-19 Thread Ed Greshko
On 8/19/19 6:54 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > Did that and the problem has magically disappeared. No AVCs were > reported, though I did relabel after turning SElinux back on. > > Curiously, I now see: > > $ virsh net-list --all > Name State Autostart Persistent > --

F30: latest kernel no external monitor

2019-08-19 Thread Gianluca Cecchi
Hello, executed "dnf update" after about 15 days of inactivity. Updates has brought in kernel 5.2.8-200.fc30.x86_64 But after reboot the system is not able to detect (in the sense of no monitor connection at all seen) when connecting a 24" Dell monitor using an usb-c to hdmi adapter on my laptop an

Re: Error starting domain: Requested operation is not valid: network 'default' is not active

2019-08-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 10:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 8/18/19 1:23 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > The above only happens when SElinux is Enabled. When Disabled, > > everything works. The same happens on both my VMs (Fedora and Windows). > > > > Looking at https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Netw

Re: Question on missing file from syslinux rpm?

2019-08-19 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 8/18/19 2:36 AM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: On 8/17/19 5:38 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote: I use syslinux in the g4l project I've maintained since 2004, and noticed that Fedora 30 includes the later 6.04 version versus the latest full released 6.03 version. Did a test, a