On 4/6/19 2:33 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/5/19 11:25 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>> # rpm -qa flash\*
>> flash-player-ppapi-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
>> flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
>>
>> # ls -al /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libpepflashplayer.so
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 44 Apr
On 4/5/19 11:25 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# rpm -qa flash\*
flash-player-ppapi-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
# ls -al /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libpepflashplayer.so
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 44 Apr 5 23:22
/usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libpepflashplayer.s
On 4/5/19 11:03 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/5/19 6:43 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/5/19 5:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
flash-player-ppapi-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
Found and installed that one at Adobe.com
flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
Can't find this one
# cat /etc/yum.rep
On 4/5/19 6:43 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/5/19 5:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
flash-player-ppapi-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
Found and installed that one at Adobe.com
flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
Can't find this one
# cat /etc/yum.repos.d/adobe-linux-x86_64.repo
[adobe-linu
On 4/6/19 9:43 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 4/5/19 5:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> flash-player-ppapi-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
> Found and installed that one at Adobe.com
>
>> flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
> Can't find this one
>
>
[root@f29bg ~]# rpm -qa | grep flash
[root@f29b
On 4/5/19 5:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
flash-player-ppapi-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
Found and installed that one at Adobe.com
flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-release.x86_64
Can't find this one
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
On 4/5/19 5:49 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/5/19 5:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Well,
https://support.brave.com/hc/en-us/articles/360018163151-How-do-I-manage-Flash-audio-video-
seems to suggest they support the Adobe Flash-Plugins.
I saw that setting too. I have Flash set to "Ask f
On 4/5/19 5:55 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/6/19 8:47 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
What am I doing wrong here?
The plugins are not distributed by Fedora. You need the Adobe Repo
https://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-adobe-flash-player-10-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/
is on
On 4/6/19 8:47 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> What am I doing wrong here?
The plugins are not distributed by Fedora. You need the Adobe Repo
https://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-adobe-flash-player-10-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel/
is one of many places describing the proced
On 4/5/19 5:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Well,
https://support.brave.com/hc/en-us/articles/360018163151-How-do-I-manage-Flash-audio-video-
seems to suggest they support the Adobe Flash-Plugins.
I saw that setting too. I have Flash set to "Ask first (recommended)".
___
On 4/5/19 5:21 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/6/19 7:20 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 4/5/19 4:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/6/19 2:31 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
FC 29 X64 (not 32)
I have a web site that requires the flash plugin. Anyone
know how to get Flash to work in B
On 4/5/19 5:11 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
It was perhaps worth a mention
that a vendor only supported RHEL and you asked for
information that might help them consider Fedora.
Hi Todd,
Oh no. They do already support Fedora as well as
Ubuntu.
They just always complain when a bug shows up in
t
On 4/6/19 8:11 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The repeated complaints about RHEL are simply not on topic
> here. Please refrain from it in the future.
+1
--
Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default
color scheme
___
On 4/6/19 7:20 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 4/5/19 4:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 4/6/19 2:31 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> FC 29 X64 (not 32)
>>>
>>> I have a web site that requires the flash plugin. Anyone
>>> know how to get Flash to work in Brave? Pepper F
Hi,
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> As I told Steven:
>
> "If you look at the original posting, you will understand.
> A vendor is giving me a bad time about running an "unstable"
> OS and tells me I should be running RHEL or clones instead.
> So the comparison needed to be made."
On 4/5/19 4:10 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/6/19 2:31 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
FC 29 X64 (not 32)
I have a web site that requires the flash plugin. Anyone
know how to get Flash to work in Brave? Pepper Flash?
Brave isn't distributed by Fedora, is it?
Have you though about
On 4/6/19 2:31 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> FC 29 X64 (not 32)
>
> I have a web site that requires the flash plugin. Anyone
> know how to get Flash to work in Brave? Pepper Flash?
Brave isn't distributed by Fedora, is it?
Have you though about going to https://brave.com/the-
On 4/5/19 4:00 PM, Stephen Perkins wrote:
+1 (or more)
/* begin rant:
I seldom post to the list, but I read each and every post everyday.
IMHO the signal is buried by the noise.
I have used RedHat since 1998, ver. 5.2, switched to Fedora in 2003,
and been here ever since. I run Fedora 29, bot
On 4/5/19 4:00 PM, Stephen Perkins wrote:
I fail to understand why posters choose to trash RHEL on this list
If you look at the original posting, you will understand. A vendor
is giving me a bad time about running an "unstable" OS and tells me
I should be running RHEL or clones instead. So the
On 4/5/19 2:36 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
Okay one last slam at RHEL:
As someone who works full-time on RHEL[*], please consider that your
understanding of what RHEL is and who it is for may color your
experience with it. You are not the ideal RHEL customer, so of
+1 (or more)
/* begin rant:
I seldom post to the list, but I read each and every post everyday.
IMHO the signal is buried by the noise.
I have used RedHat since 1998, ver. 5.2, switched to Fedora in 2003,
and been here ever since. I run Fedora 29, both X86_64 and i686 on a
workstation (X86_64)
Hi,
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Okay one last slam at RHEL:
Yes, please and thank you, let that be the last one. :)
It's really not appropriate for this forum. We're here to
talk about Fedora, not gripe about any other distributions.
Thanks,
--
Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
ToddAndMargo via users writes:
> Okay one last slam at RHEL:
As someone who works full-time on RHEL[*], please consider that your
understanding of what RHEL is and who it is for may color your
experience with it. You are not the ideal RHEL customer, so of course
it doesn't meet your strict need
On 4/5/19 11:31 AM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
FC 29 X64 (not 32)
I have a web site that requires the flash plugin. Anyone
know how to get Flash to work in Brave? Pepper Flash?
-T
I do have the following installed, but Brave does not seem to pick it up:
# ls -al /usr/lib64/chr
On 4/4/19 11:12 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 08:51:32PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 3/31/19 4:51 PM, David Dusanic wrote:
Fedora is bleeding edge
Not really. It is the next thing that is stable after the
bleeding edge. Think LibreOffice and Firefox and the ke
On 4/4/19 11:06 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:20:10PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I just had a vendor tell me they do not support Fedora Server
because the the developers of Fedora had stated that it is not
a stable release and is used only as a testing ground
On 4/4/19 11:12 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 08:51:32PM -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 3/31/19 4:51 PM, David Dusanic wrote:
Fedora is bleeding edge
Not really. It is the next thing that is stable after the
bleeding edge. Think LibreOffice and Firefox and the ke
On 4/4/19 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:30:21PM -0400, Digimer wrote:
I've had so many bug reports to Fedora go ignored, only to have them
auto-close when the version I filed against goes EOL. I rarely even
bother filing bugs against it anymore.
Yeah, this is frust
On 4/4/19 1:42 PM, Thomas Dineen wrote:
That's it! that's the ticket!
Proposed statement on Fedora's purpose:
"To cause servers to use more power!"
Without this the entire economy collapses!
Thomas Dineen
You two are funny bunnies!
___
users mailin
Hi All,
I subscribe to Go To Assist, but they are dragging their ever
living feet on supporting Linux. (And I complain bitterly to
them about it on a frequently basis.)
Do you guys know of a remote assistance package that will
work on Fedora? The target customer will be logging into
hot spots,
Hi All,
FC 29 X64 (not 32)
I have a web site that requires the flash plugin. Anyone
know how to get Flash to work in Brave? Pepper Flash?
-T
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.f
On 5/4/19 8:38 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 4/5/19 5:05 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
Should we have smartmontools v7.0 (released end of last year) by now? It
includes this disk.
Looks as if this is in the works. You could download from here and give it a
try.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
On 4/5/19 5:05 PM, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote:
> Should we have smartmontools v7.0 (released end of last year) by now? It
> includes this disk.
>
Looks as if this is in the works. You could download from here and give it a
try.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1241515
--
Righ
fedora 28 up-to-date.
I have a new array, not yet commissioned, and one disk now complains
Device: /dev/sde [SAT], FAILED SMART self-check. BACK UP DATA NOW!
and the reason, I understand, is this
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGSVALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
200 Mu
Hi Adrian
did you try to do (before the update):
dnf clean metadata
and if this does not help either
dnf clean all
?
suomi
On 05/04/2019 09.11, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi! I am trying to upgrade my long overdue f27 to f29 (to prepare for
f30 :)) but i have problems with :
Error: Failed to sync
Hi! I am trying to upgrade my long overdue f27 to f29 (to prepare for
f30 :)) but i have problems with :
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates'
I already updated my system by pointing the baseurls to the archive
but then if i try
dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=
36 matches
Mail list logo
