On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 10:50 -0800, Howard Howell wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:52 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2/20/19 9:23 AM, Howard Howell wrote:
> > > That didn't go well at all I dnf installed system-config-
> > > firewall
> > > and invoked it as sudo system-config-firewall:
> >
>
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 11:52 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2/20/19 9:23 AM, Howard Howell wrote:
> > That didn't go well at all I dnf installed system-config-
> > firewall
> > and invoked it as sudo system-config-firewall:
>
> system-config-firewall is the old way for configuring iptables. If
ok, here's the solution in Gnome...
1. install "gnome-shell-extension-ibus-font", which I did from the
command line:
dnf install gnome-shell-extension-ibus-font
2. run "gnome-shell-extension-prefs", which I did from the command line:
gnome-shell-extension-prefs
This launches a GUI. Scroll dow
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:36:08 +0100
"Patrick Dupre" wrote:
> How can I make a dnf install "list of pkgs in a file"?
>
> I tried dnf install `file`
>
> but it does not work.
I usually use a python script to read the file and run dnf in a
subprocess for each package. That way, a single problem d
dnf install `cat file`
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 9:02 AM stan via users
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 15:36:08 +0100
> "Patrick Dupre" wrote:
>
> > How can I make a dnf install "list of pkgs in a file"?
> >
> > I tried dnf install `file`
> >
> > but it does not work.
>
> I usually use a python sc
As long as you're sure you want to install all of those packages then:
# cat 'file' | xargs dnf -y install
should do it. You have to do the -y because dnf will just exit if you
don't. You can't run an interactive prompt...
Thanks,
Richard
___
users mai
Hello,
How can I make a dnf install "list of pkgs in a file"?
I tried dnf install `file`
but it does not work.
Thank
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplina
On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 13:09 -0800, Mike Wright wrote:
> [snip]
> You didn't have a dns delegation-of-authority which allows you to
> claim
> control or the mail server's reverse dns address and showing you're
> not
> some fly-by-night spammer or some such.
>
> If your were to dig for the PTR rec
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:09 AM Patrick Dupre wrote:
> The issue is solved.
> Because I did not boot on the SUB live in UEFI, the install was not
> compatible with a UEFI
> boot.
>
> Sorry for the disturbance.
>
It's not intuitive! But that was going to be my next question, glad you
figured it o
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 23:00 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Putting the following section in xorg.conf caused Gnome under Xorg to
> start with the resolution of the Maximized vmware player, which was
> 1600x844, as desired. KDE did not start at the resolution of 1600x844,
> instead starting at 64
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 22:32 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 21/2/19 9:48 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 2/21/19 6:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 20:29 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > > > On 21/2/19 6:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > > > > On 2/20/19 1:02 AM, Stephen Mor
The issue is solved.
Because I did not boot on the SUB live in UEFI, the install was not compatible with a UEFI
boot.
Sorry for the disturbance.___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists
On 21/2/19 10:32 pm, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 21/2/19 9:48 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2/21/19 6:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 20:29 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 21/2/19 6:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/20/19 1:02 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
lspci provides the followi
On 21/2/19 9:48 pm, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2/21/19 6:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 20:29 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
On 21/2/19 6:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/20/19 1:02 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
lspci provides the following output for the device:
00:0f.0 VGA compa
On 2/21/19 6:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 20:29 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> On 21/2/19 6:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>> On 2/20/19 1:02 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
lspci provides the following output for the device:
00:0f.0 VGA compatible controller: VMw
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 20:29 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 21/2/19 6:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 2/20/19 1:02 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > > lspci provides the following output for the device:
> > >
> > > 00:0f.0 VGA compatible controller: VMware SVGA II Adapter
> >
> > As Patrick pointe
On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 07:50 +, George R Goffe via users wrote:
> BTW, this release of Fedora is FC30 x86_64
There is no FC30 (or F30 which is what it would in due course be
called) unless it's Rawhide, in which case this is really a question
for the Fedora Test list.
poc
_
One though,
When I installed fedora from the USB stick, I had to boot without UEFI, because
the bios did not recognize the stick as providing a UEFI mounting point.
Could have been a problem?
However, on the key, I have /boot/efi
I also checked (from the fedora live when mounted on
I also checked (from the fedora live when mounted on /mnt/linux)
df -h --local | grep /boot
/dev/sdb4 477M 151M 298M 34% /mnt/linux/boot
but I have
ls /mnt/linux/boot
config-4.16.3-301.fc28.x86_64 initramfs-0-rescue-5b77b2954d4149beab535546c82f45a0.img System.map-4.
Hello,
I guess that the issue comme from:
efibootmgr /dev/sdb
EFI variables are not supported on this system.
The fstab seems OK
as well as the /boot/efi
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire i
parted -l
Model: ATA SK hynix SC311 S (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 512GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags: pmbr_boot
Number Start End SizeFile system Name Flags
1 1049kB 787MB 786MB fat32 EFI system partition
On 21/2/19 6:47 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 2/20/19 1:02 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
lspci provides the following output for the device:
00:0f.0 VGA compatible controller: VMware SVGA II Adapter
As Patrick pointed out, this is clearly not an NVidia device. You can
find out which driver is actua
On 02/21/2019 12:50 AM, George R Goffe via users wrote:
BTW, this release of Fedora is FC30 x86_64.
I hadn't heard that Fc30 is even in alpha yet. However, that shouldn't
matter because I doubt that the code for xterm has changed in many years.
___
23 matches
Mail list logo
