On 10/20/18 11:05 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
1. Why wouldn't the boot fsck fix the problem without dumping to a command
prompt?
I think it's run in "preen" mode or something similar. It will fix
simple issues and check things, but if there's a problem that could have
significant effects
On 10/20/18 9:03 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 20Oct2018 18:55, Stephen Perkins wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:01 PM stan
wrote:
Would you willingly or
reluctantly migrate to the new platform?
Neither. If this list disappears, I will too.
Likewise.
And another likewise
On 20Oct2018 18:55, Stephen Perkins wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:01 PM stan wrote:
Would you willingly or
reluctantly migrate to the new platform?
Neither. If this list disappears, I will too.
Likewise.
Unless the forum provides a bidirectional gateway with the existing
mailing list,
On 10/21/18 8:40 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 10/21/18 7:52 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>>> But that said, I don't see any reason why there could not be
>>> a users forum and an email list co-existing.
>> Are you aware that is already the case for this mailing list?
>>
>> https
Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 10/21/18 7:52 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> But that said, I don't see any reason why there could not be
>> a users forum and an email list co-existing.
>
> Are you aware that is already the case for this mailing list?
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@
On 10/21/18 7:52 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> But that said, I don't see any reason why there could not be
> a users forum and an email list co-existing.
Are you aware that is already the case for this mailing list?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org/
--
Leander Hutton wrote:
> Discourse, Discord or Slack are what everyone seem to be clustering
> around these days. The main thing I like about mailing lists and even to
> some extent IRC is it's a bit more decentralized and is easily locally
> archived. They're also built around a standard or protoco
stan wrote:
> I'm wondering how the people who regularly use
> fedora-users mailing list feel about that. Which would
> you prefer?
Forums have never been something I care for. Anything which
forces its choice of interface upon me is something I don't
use joyfully.
But that said, I don't see an
On 10/20/18 5:42 PM, stan wrote:
> I'm wondering how the people who regularly use fedora-users mailing
> list feel about that. Which would you prefer? Unfortunately, it's an
> either / or proposal, because there is no interface in Discourse for
> emails from an email list to be put in their forum
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:56 PM Ed Greshko wrote:
>
> On 10/21/18 5:42 AM, stan wrote:
> > I'm wondering how the people who regularly use fedora-users mailing
> > list feel about that.
>
> I would simply stop contributing.
>
And that is why I would be leaving. Your contributions have helped
me,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:35 PM Mike Wright
wrote:
> On 10/20/18 3:17 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:42:20 -0700
> > stan wrote:
> >
> >> I'm wondering how the people who regularly use fedora-users mailing
> >> list feel about that.
> >
> > There is already a fedoraforum which
>On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:01 PM stan wrote:
>Would you willingly or
> reluctantly migrate to the new platform?
>
Neither. If this list disappears, I will too.
__
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
On 10/21/18 5:42 AM, stan wrote:
> I'm wondering how the people who regularly use fedora-users mailing
> list feel about that.
I would simply stop contributing.
--
Cardinal Rule of Presentations: "Tell them what you are going to tell them,
tell them,
then tell them what you told them."
This comes up occasionally on another list I belong to. The dynamic of
a forum and a mailinglist are very different, mostly because one is
push and one is pull.
With a forum, you have to *go* to the site, which means that folk who
are peripherally interested will just stop looking unless they hav
On 10/20/18 3:17 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:42:20 -0700
stan wrote:
I'm wondering how the people who regularly use fedora-users mailing
list feel about that.
There is already a fedoraforum which I don't use at all because
I despise forums because they are nothing like as us
On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:42:20 -0700
stan wrote:
> I'm wondering how the people who regularly use fedora-users mailing
> list feel about that.
There is already a fedoraforum which I don't use at all because
I despise forums because they are nothing like as useful as mailing lists.
_
On 10/20/18 5:42 PM, stan wrote:
> Hi,
> There's a big mail thread on fedora-devel about using a web forum
> software called Discourse instead of mailing lists. The idea is that
> it would invigorate the Fedora community by encouraging younger people
> raised on social media and mobile platforms
Hi,
There's a big mail thread on fedora-devel about using a web forum
software called Discourse instead of mailing lists. The idea is that
it would invigorate the Fedora community by encouraging younger people
raised on social media and mobile platforms to contribute. One of the
targets they have
Hi List.
Thanks for letting me post some things that are seriously off topic.
The issue of using php/(b2evolution) to handle sending emails -- using
an smtp server. Testing against smtp.yahoo.com with the required
SSL/port. Never could get it to quite work. However, when using
gmail's smtp server
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 02:02:52PM -0400, bruce wrote:
> While I can seem to generate a valid server connection, it appears
> something is happening to prevent a successful test email
Remember that with Google, it may identify your server as a "Less secure
system". The account owner has to au
I was doing a search of directories to see the sizes, and had some messages
come up about Structure needs cleaning?
My original solution didn't work so well.
Files where in the /var/lib/yum/yumdb directory and the latest one was from
2016.
Since it was part of the / (root) partition /dev/sda2,
Hi Alex...
After much thrashing.. I decided to test the use of the smtp.yahoo.com
smtp server with the user/passwd/port...
While I can seem to generate a valid server connection, it appears
something is happening to prevent a successful test email
arrrggghhh.. the trek continues!
On Sat, Oc
Am 20.10.2018 um 18:03 schrieb bruce:
Hi Walter,
This is a simple digitalocean test server/app. there's an ipaddress..
no dns.. no FQDN.. just some test php, as well as the test open source
web app i'm testing out..
Your setup has the footprint of a spammer. Yahoo has implemented DMARK
and yo
Hi Walter,
This is a simple digitalocean test server/app. there's an ipaddress..
no dns.. no FQDN.. just some test php, as well as the test open source
web app i'm testing out..
So the "normal" process one would use for email/dns/etc.. aren't here..
thanks
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:54 AM Walte
On 20.10.2018 17:28, bruce wrote:
Hi Walter,
Thanks for the reply.
is there any log maybe the mail is rejected or whatever?
your webserver should relay to sendmail/postfix and this part has the log;
your server should have a correct rDNS and DNS which is used in EHLO
smime.p7s
Descripti
Hi Walter,
Thanks for the reply.
Tried the change/suggestions in the header... Actually changed the
> Return-Path: b2evo-return@104.248.125.83<--- this is no good idea,
FQDN expected
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 06:08:17 +
> X-Mailer: b2evolution 6.10.3-stable - PHP/7.2.
On 20.10.2018 10:57, bruce wrote:
However, the yahoo process seems to have issues with the emai. I've
submitted the test email address to the yahoo contacts list as well as
checking the spam folder. No luck.
see comments below
The headers of the email are:
usc_...@yahoo.com
Subject:
Activ
Feel free to ignore this one !!
I'm testing a webapp, using the test ipadress from the previous email
thread on the apache/vhost setup.
In this case, I'm sending a "test" email to a dummy yahoo email
account to register a test user in the test app. When I perform this
same action with a dummy gma
28 matches
Mail list logo
