On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Tim via users <
users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Allegedly, on or about 30 April 2018, JD sent:
> > I had no idea tha Caja would be doing this, and what's
> > more is that all it's i/o was to/from the boot disk.
> >
> > About 30 minutes after I sent the emai
Allegedly, on or about 30 April 2018, JD sent:
> I had no idea tha Caja would be doing this, and what's
> more is that all it's i/o was to/from the boot disk.
>
> About 30 minutes after I sent the email, it's i/o load
> wen down back to near zero.
Perhaps a thumbnailer plug-in trawling through l
top shows cpu load, and not i/o load. Usually processes
that are i/o bound consume less cpu time, due to having
to wait for the completion of each i/o operation.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Fred Smith
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 12:36:08PM -0600, JD wrote:
> > I have not seen this befo
iotop shows it to consume that much i/o bandwidth.
I had no idea tha Caja would be doing this, and what's
more is that all it's i/o was to/from the boot disk.
About 30 minutes after I sent the email, it's i/o load
wen down back to near zero.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Le 30/04/2018 à 15:25, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 04/30/18 20:46, François Patte wrote:
>> Le 30/04/2018 à 00:43, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>> On 04/30/18 03:37, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/30/18 00:10, François Patte wrote:
> So, my conclusion is that it does not like xfce... How can I find out
>>
Turned out there was a problem with an old library getting in the way.
As part of my investigation I ran 'rpm --verify' on all packages and noticed
this:
L/usr/lib64/libGL.so.1
L/usr/lib/libGL.so.1
So I checked:
# ls -l /usr/lib*/libGL.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
On 04/30/18 20:46, François Patte wrote:
> Le 30/04/2018 à 00:43, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 04/30/18 03:37, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 04/30/18 00:10, François Patte wrote:
So, my conclusion is that it does not like xfce... How can I find out
what is wrong in xfce for this program?
>>> I'l
on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/Schedule
In the paragraph under the table it says, "We plan to release on the
"Preferred Target dates listed above, or if the
Fedora_Program_Management/GoNoGoSOP Go/No-Go meeting decides we're not
ready, on the "Target #1" dates. See the Fedora Release
I see fedora 28 schedule says release is tomorrow, then there is
another release next week for target #1. What on earth does that mean?
(I clicked on the link and the word "target" does not appear in
in the page it takes me to, so the meaning seems well disguised).
_
Le 30/04/2018 à 00:43, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 04/30/18 03:37, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 04/30/18 00:10, François Patte wrote:
>>> So, my conclusion is that it does not like xfce... How can I find out
>>> what is wrong in xfce for this program?
>>
>> I'll give xfce a try later today.
>>
>>
> I trie
10 matches
Mail list logo
