On 10/3/18 4:00 pm, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 07:19 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 07:16 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLESS, I edit /etc/group
and add the following to root
ro
Hi,
I use an Asus Geforce GTX 1070 nvidia card with 8 GB of memory. I
am also using the nvidia driver source from negativo17 for version
390.25. Within Nvidia X Server Configuration I have selected FXAA
Antialiasing within the opengl settings and that has caused an issue in
my F27 impleme
On 03/09/2018 07:19 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 03/09/2018 07:16 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLESS, I edit /etc/group
and add the following to root
root:x:0:saned
Without it, I get
$ xsane
On 03/09/2018 07:16 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLESS, I edit /etc/group
and add the following to root
root:x:0:saned
Without it, I get
$ xsane net:localhost:epkowa:interpreter:001:007
Acce
Hi All,
Okay, now this is "scary".
Both xsane and Simple Scan work locally.
I can not get saned to work, UNLESS, I edit /etc/group
and add the following to root
root:x:0:saned
Without it, I get
$ xsane net:localhost:epkowa:interpreter:001:007
Access to resource has been denied
Now what am I
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 03:06 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>> In the git package, there aren't symlinks. Within /usr/bin,
>> the git binaries which are identical are hardlinked to each
>> other. And separately, within /usr/libexec/git-core, the
>> git binaries which are identical are hard
On 03/09/2018 03:06 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Samuel Sieb wrote:
In the git package, there aren't symlinks. Within /usr/bin,
the git binaries which are identical are hardlinked to each
other. And separately, within /usr/libexec/git-core, the
git binaries which are identical are hardlinked to ea
On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 09:57 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> No, what I was mentioning here is what I have read as standard linux
> functionality with copying, when a file is copied, and it doesn't
> matter where to, rather than create a 2nd copy of the file, the
> "copy" is created as a hard link t
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 01:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>that was my understanding -- as long as the files are within
>> precisely the same directory, hard links could still be used, but any
>> cross-directory links (even if within the same filesystem) will use
>> symlinks. is tha
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018, Stephen Morris wrote:
> On 9/3/18 9:11 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 07:59 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> >> It is my understanding that currently when a file copied to any
> >> location, a physical copy is not produced, the copy is a hardlink
> >> t
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Tom H wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >>> On 03/10/18 03:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> subject says it all ... what is the purpose of
On 9/3/18 9:11 am, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 07:59 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
It is my understanding that currently when a file copied to any
location, a physical copy is not produced, the copy is a hardlink to the
original file, until such time as one of the "copies" is
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:51 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 03/10/18 03:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
/usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the
On 03/10/18 05:55, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> or perhaps i'm just curious about the purpose of package components.
> seriously,
And for these types of questions, which are so narrowly focused, you really
should be
going to the folks that supply it to multiple distros.
Your kinda like asking
On 03/10/18 05:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> yes, i grok that, but given the existence of the rpm2cpio
> executable, is there any additional functionality provided by that
> script? why is it there? what purpose does it serve above and beyond
> the rpm2cpio program?
You really should go ask the
On Sat, 10 Mar 2018, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/10/18 05:39, Tom H wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 03/10/18 03:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>> subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
> >>> /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary exe
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 03/10/18 03:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>
> >> subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
> >> /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary executable
> >> /usr/bin/rpm2cpio?
> >
> >
On 03/10/18 05:39, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 03/10/18 03:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
>>> /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary executable
>>> /usr/bin/rpm2cpio?
>> The best place t
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
>
> I am on a single-account F27 system with an user id 1000. I want to
> change this user id. From what I understand, I should do the following:
>
> sudo usermod -u 54321
>
> However, when I do this, I get:
>
> usermod: user is currently used
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/10/18 03:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>
>> subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
>> /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary executable
>> /usr/bin/rpm2cpio?
>
> The best place to ask would be at one of the resou
On 03/10/18 03:38, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
> /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary executable
> /usr/bin/rpm2cpio?
The best place to ask would be at one of the resources list here
http://rpm.org/community.html
--
I believ
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 03/09/2018 11:38 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
> > /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary executable
> > /usr/bin/rpm2cpio?
>
> I believe /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh validates that
On 03/09/2018 11:38 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
> /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary executable
> /usr/bin/rpm2cpio?
I believe /usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh validates that the given file IS an
RPM in the first place, then un
On 03/09/2018 01:27 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
that was my understanding -- as long as the files are within
precisely the same directory, hard links could still be used, but any
cross-directory links (even if within the same filesystem) will use
symlinks. is that about right?
From what you
subject says it all ... what is the purpose of the file
/usr/lib/rpm/rpm2cpio.sh given the existing binary executable
/usr/bin/rpm2cpio?
rday
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fed
Hi,
I want to install replica server but I have errors.
Replica server:
System: CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core)
IPA: VERSION: 4.5.0, API_VERSION: 2.228
What I do:
ipa-client-install --mkhomedir
This process ran without a problem
Next
[root@auth02 ~]# ipa-replica-install
Password for ad.
Hello, Fedora users,
How do I change the mount point of a USB dongle on Fedora when using automount ?
When I insert a USB dongle, it is automounted under /run/media/root/4031-0655
I want it to be automounted on /mnt/sdb1
Regards,
Kevin
___
users mailing
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> another question based on something that tripped me up last week
> teaching, when i tried a simple demo and was confused by the result.
>
> was demonstrating how "rpm -V" could verify an installed package,
> and randomly chose the "setup" package s
On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 03/08/2018 12:59 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
> > On 9/3/18 6:13 am, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> >> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>> ... ah, so the replacement of those cross-directory hardlinks
> >>> with symlinks will happen in F28, is that what you're saying?
>
another question based on something that tripped me up last week
teaching, when i tried a simple demo and was confused by the result.
was demonstrating how "rpm -V" could verify an installed package,
and randomly chose the "setup" package since it consists of numerous
fundamental system files
30 matches
Mail list logo
