On 08/08/2017 08:30 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> What is the bugzilla #?
Never mind. I found it. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417396
No indication as of yet that it is intel specific.
--
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
On 08/08/2017 05:32 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 11:59 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2017 08:34 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
These should be easy to find out but they don't seem to be: What X d
On 08/08/2017 04:51 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 09:57 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> On 08/07/2017 09:34 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
>>> These should be easy to find out but they don't seem to be: What X driver
>>> does my
>>> system use? If as I suspect it's for intel/Haske
On 08/07/2017 02:40 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
I tried looking at the properties of the thunderbird shortcut,
clicked on the text icon to navigate to where the thunderbird icons were
and re-selected the icon, but that made no difference to the icon
displayed. Why is the upgrade from F25 to
Hi,
I have used dnf system-upgrade to upgrade my F25 system to F26 and
now all the shortcuts on my Desktop no longer display their configured
icons, they display a text page icon instead. Under KDE they continue to
display fine.
I tried looking at the properties of the thunderbird sh
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:05 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 11:59 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 08/06/2017 08:34 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > > These should be easy to find out but they don't seem to be:
> > >
> > > What X driver does my system use? If as I sus
On 8/5/17 5:36 PM, Tim wrote:
Hi,
Have we got to the stage where the default install options for Fedora
26 work fine with a SSD, or should I be tweaking something?
At the moment I've let it install with whatever parameters it does by
itself. All I did was change from using LVM to EXT4 (I se
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 11:59 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/06/2017 08:34 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > These should be easy to find out but they don't seem to be:
> >
> > What X driver does my system use? If as I suspect it's for intel/Haskel, is
> > it set
> > to use sna or uxa acc
> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 09:57 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > On 08/07/2017 09:34 AM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> > These should be easy to find out but they don't seem to be:
> >
> > What X driver does my system use? If as I suspect it's for intel/Haskel, is
> > it set
> > to use sna or uxa accelerat
> The root / filesystem isn't force-checked with /forcefsck; you'd have
> to use fsck.mode=force kernel boot parameter. I tested that on a clean
> install in a vm. The other filesystems listed in fsck are checked
> AFAICS.
Yes, I discovered that. All my filesystems were checked apart from /!
Fréd
On 08/07/2017 12:52 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
gnome-classic-session.noarch 3.14.2-1.fc21 @koji-override-0/$releasever
Why are you using such an old version of Fedora? I don't think I can
help you with that.
_at the command line :*yum list gnome-tweak-tools *I get :_*
*
Error: No matchin
On 08/06/2017 08:34 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
These should be easy to find out but they don't seem to be:
What X driver does my system use? If as I suspect it's for intel/Haskel, is it set
to use sna or uxa acceleration?
Hardware is:
4 core
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4460 CPU @ 3.20GHz
Software
Neal Becker wrote:
> Aug 7 11:07:57 nbecker7 systemd-logind: Removed session 154.
>
> I'm trying to use x2go, but it seems when I try to suspend/resume a
> session
> it isn't working - on reconnect a new session is started. Is the system?
> The above log message suggests maybe.
>
> In logind.c
Aug 7 11:07:57 nbecker7 systemd-logind: Removed session 154.
I'm trying to use x2go, but it seems when I try to suspend/resume a session
it isn't working - on reconnect a new session is started. Is the system?
The above log message suggests maybe.
In logind.conf I see:
#KillUserProcesses=no
On 08/07/2017 04:55 PM, Angelo Moreschini wrote:
> I just want to add that there are already two submenus on the desktop; they
> created
> at the Fedora Firstinstallation:
>
> 1. Sunddyr (it groups :Adobe Flash Player. Configuration Editor, Firewall,
> Print
> setting, ...,.._
> 2. Utility
I just want to add that there are already two submenus on the desktop; they
created at the Fedora First installation:
1. Sunddyr (it groups :Adobe Flash Player. Configuration Editor,
Firewall, Print setting, ...,.._
2. Utility (it groups :Help, Logs, System monitor, ..., ...,...)
On M
Thank you for the your explanation.. (I had some problems with the internet
connection ...)
I suppose that I have both packages installed on my computer:
*at the command line : yum list gnome-classic-session, I get*
* :*
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Repodata is over 2 weeks old. Install yum-cron?
17 matches
Mail list logo