On 03/21/17 19:59, Tony Nelson wrote:
> On 17-03-20 19:42:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
> ...
>> FWIW, I created a Virtual Machine with 2 32GB disks. I then installed
>> an F25 KDE based system using the netinst ISO. I gave the VM 1.2GB of
>> RAM. For the disk configuration I requested RAID1 and
>>
>>
On 03/22/17 01:17, François Patte wrote:
> I read the installation guide
>
> On this page:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Installation_Guide/Create_Software_RAID-x86.html
>
> no mention on how to create an lvm once your raid is created.
>
> (funny: the example given is
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 06:17:37PM +0100, François Patte wrote:
> Le 21/03/2017 16:41, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> > On 03/21/17 23:19, François Patte wrote:
>
>
>
> >> As I told in my message: using the graphical version of anaconda, you
> >> have not the choice: either you ask for lvm, or you ask f
Le 21/03/2017 18:17, François Patte a écrit :
> Le 21/03/2017 16:41, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 03/21/17 23:19, François Patte wrote:
>
>
>
>>> As I told in my message: using the graphical version of anaconda, you
>>> have not the choice: either you ask for lvm, or you ask for raid
>>
>> Well. y
Le 21/03/2017 16:41, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 03/21/17 23:19, François Patte wrote:
>> As I told in my message: using the graphical version of anaconda, you
>> have not the choice: either you ask for lvm, or you ask for raid
>
> Well. you are 100% WRONG in that regard.
>
> I did use the grap
WARNING: FOR TESTING PURPOSES ONLY!
For this, particular case, a workaround is created in the NetworkManager.
"device: add spec "driver:" to match devices"
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=b869d9cc0dda
I've tested with the device driven by r8712u.ko and it wor
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:19 AM, François Patte
wrote:
> Le 21/03/2017 14:53, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>
>> Then in a subsequent message you gave a list of what sort of
>> partitioning you wanted and what you seem to have ended up with. And
>> it was brought to your attention that a separate /usr is
Le 21/03/2017 17:36, Tim a écrit :
> Allegedly, on or about 21 March 2017, Ed Greshko sent:
>>
>> So You just want to resize your swap at this point.
>
> Wondering if they're trying to resize their swap while it's in use?
>
No! Of course not
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et
Allegedly, on or about 21 March 2017, Ed Greshko sent:
>
> So You just want to resize your swap at this point.
Wondering if they're trying to resize their swap while it's in use?
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64
Boi
On 03/21/17 23:19, François Patte wrote:
> Le 21/03/2017 14:53, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 03/21/17 19:30, François Patte wrote:
>>> So what?
>>>
>>> I am sorry but I do not understand what you mean
>> Well, you originally had made some statements about how bad anaconda
>> is. In your original
Le 21/03/2017 14:53, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 03/21/17 19:30, François Patte wrote:
>> So what?
>>
>> I am sorry but I do not understand what you mean
>
> Well, you originally had made some statements about how bad anaconda
> is. In your original post you used phrases like "but after sometim
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 03/21/17 19:54, Tom H wrote:
>> Maybe it would've been clearer if the outputs of lvm and mdadm had
>> been included, but it's clear that:
>>
>> - there are two mdadm raid1s of 1G and 34G,
>>
>> - /boot is the 1G raidvol,
>>
>> - /, /var, /
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:24 AM, François Patte
wrote:
> Le 21/03/2017 12:54, Tom H a écrit :
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:30 AM, François Patte
>> wrote:
>>> Le 21/03/2017 00:42, Ed Greshko a écrit :
On 03/20/17 19:17, François Patte wrote:
FWIW, I created a Virtual Machine with 2
On 03/21/17 19:54, Tom H wrote:
> Maybe it would've been clearer if the outputs of lvm and mdadm had
> been included, but it's clear that:
>
> - there are two mdadm raid1s of 1G and 34G,
>
> - /boot is the 1G raidvol,
>
> - /, /var, /home, and swap are LVs on the 34G raidvol.
OK, fair enough.
On 03/21/17 19:30, François Patte wrote:
> So what?
>
> I am sorry but I do not understand what you mean
Well, you originally had made some statements about how bad anaconda
is. In your original post you used phrases like "but after sometimes
anaconda refuses to do anything" and "Unfortunate
Le 21/03/2017 12:54, Tom H a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:30 AM, François Patte
> wrote:
>> Le 21/03/2017 00:42, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>> On 03/20/17 19:17, François Patte wrote:
>
>
After many attempts to install f25, I can now log in and see how
anaconda makes the partitionnin
On 17-03-20 19:42:20, Ed Greshko wrote:
...
FWIW, I created a Virtual Machine with 2 32GB disks. I then installed
an F25 KDE based system using the netinst ISO. I gave the VM 1.2GB of
RAM. For the disk configuration I requested RAID1 and
/ of 14GB
/boot of 1GB
/var of 11GB
swap of 2GB
/
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:30 AM, François Patte
wrote:
> Le 21/03/2017 00:42, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>> On 03/20/17 19:17, François Patte wrote:
>>> After many attempts to install f25, I can now log in and see how
>>> anaconda makes the partitionning:
>>>
>>> What I wanted is a RAID1 system with t
Le 21/03/2017 00:42, Ed Greshko a écrit :
> On 03/20/17 19:17, François Patte wrote:
>> After many attempts to install f25, I can now log in and see how
>> anaconda makes the partitionning:
>>
>> What I wanted is a RAID1 system with this partitionning:
>>
>> / 2Gib
>> /boot / 1Gib
>> swap 4Gib
>
On 03/20/2017 04:47 PM, François Patte wrote:
> Le 19/03/2017 20:13, Joe Zeff a écrit :
>> On 03/19/2017 11:24 AM, François Patte wrote:
>>> For instance: I create / and swap and /home, after that it stops. I
>>> exit and come back; I create / and /boot and swap and /home and /var,
>>> then it
20 matches
Mail list logo
