On 11/24/2016 10:34 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
My question is why has Mozilla decided not to allow it? In the past it
has said an addon
is not compatible with a new version, however in this case it just says
Firefox will not
install it implying something else ...
Most likely it's not signed. Where
On 11/24/16 20:38, Bryon Adams wrote:
>+
>
>Most important to me is it is a simple
>way to eliminate the "talking heads"
I've never used that extension but would the reading view accomplish the same
thing?
I don't understand your suggestion,
butI'm sure there are a number of ways
to do this,
t
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM, DB wrote:
> I've recently bought an Epson all-in-one & am having a pile of difficulty
> to get it to work properly.
>
What driver are you using for it? I have a WF-3620 and WF-3640 all-in-ones,
and I discovered that the driver packaged with Fedora doesn't work. I
On 11/25/16 08:35, Paul Smith wrote:
> It appears that by disabling gpu when calling Chrome, the problem is fixed:
>
> google-chrome-stable --disable-gpu
>
> I will confirm that later.
Well, if that does fix your problem then the obvious follow-up question would
be.
What is your Video Hard
On Nov 24, 2016 8:16 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
>
> On 11/24/16 19:53, jd1008 wrote:
> > Just curious!
> > What does umatrix do for FF?
>
> +
>
> Most important to me is it is a simple
> way to eliminate the "talking heads" on
> Fox News, etc. I just want to read the
> text I select, otherwise I might
On 11/24/16 19:53, jd1008 wrote:
Just curious!
What does umatrix do for FF?
+
Most important to me is it is a simple
way to eliminate the "talking heads" on
Fox News, etc. I just want to read the
text I select, otherwise I might watch TV.
Bob
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
http://www
On 11/24/2016 05:47 PM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Does anyone know why Firefox no longer allows the umatrix addon, not
since the update to Firefox 50 two days ago. Umatrix was removed and
would not install. I had to downgrade to Firefox 49 and install a copy
from the umatrix web page to get it back
Does anyone know why Firefox no longer
allows the umatrix addon, not since the
update to Firefox 50 two days ago.
Umatrix was removed and would not
install. I had to downgrade to Firefox
49 and install a copy from the umatrix
web page to get it back again.
Bob
--
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virgi
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>> I have also erased Chrome's cache and history, but to no effect.
>>> Moreover, I have re-installed Chrome. Maybe, I should mention that F25
>>> was installed on my machine by upgrading from F24.
>> As was mine. Reinstalling a package in Linux
On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:31:09 -0500
fedora2015 wrote:
> I am getting this error message on two PC's:
>
> Error: Transaction check error:
>file /etc/ld.so.conf.d/nvidia-lib64.conf from install of
> nvidia-driver-cuda-libs-2:375.20-1.fc24.x86_64 conflicts with file
> from package xorg-x11-drv-
On 11/25/16 05:47, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 18:27 +, Paul Smith wrote:
>> I have also erased Chrome's cache and history, but to no effect.
>> Moreover, I have re-installed Chrome. Maybe, I should mention that F25
>> was installed on my machine by upgrading from F24.
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 18:27 +, Paul Smith wrote:
> I have also erased Chrome's cache and history, but to no effect.
> Moreover, I have re-installed Chrome. Maybe, I should mention that F25
> was installed on my machine by upgrading from F24.
As was mine. Reinstalling a package in Linux is usua
Good evening all!
I've recently bought an Epson all-in-one & am having a pile of
difficulty to get it to work properly.
a) Connected via USB, it appears to work.
b) Connected via wifi, it'll print but not scan.
c) operating via Oracle VirtualBox it does not get recognised,
Does anyone have an
I am getting this error message on two PC's:
Error: Transaction check error:
file /etc/ld.so.conf.d/nvidia-lib64.conf from install of
nvidia-driver-cuda-libs-2:375.20-1.fc24.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx-libs-1:340.96-2.fc24.x86_64
This occurs with latest
On 11/24/2016 10:36 AM, SternData wrote:
After exiting from a remote SSH via terminal, I get
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 811: _dl_close: Assertion
`map->l_init_called' failed!
The issue is being investigated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398370
_
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>> > > > > Dear All,
>> > > > > I have
>> > > > > google-chrome-stable-54.0.2840.100-1.x86_64
>> > > > > running on F25, but it deadlocks so often. Any solutions?
>> > > > > Thanks in advance,
>> > > >
>> > > > Can you describe the deadl
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:52:49 -0500
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> One of my usual post-Fedora upgrade rituals is to reset the default
> plymouth theme back to solar. There's a long-standing bug with system
> upgrades always resetting the plymouth theme to the default "charge".
> That bug is somewhere i
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:33:35AM +0100, Andras Simon wrote:
> It's too late now because the upgrade has already succeded (though I
> may run into these issues again when I go to F25 or upgrade other
> laptops) but this problem came up even when I had only one kernel
> installed with installonly_l
I have the same on one centos 6.8 machine. Haven't figured out what's the
matter yet )
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016, 7:42 PM SternData
wrote:
> After exiting from a remote SSH via terminal, I get
>
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 811: _dl_close: Assertion
> `map->l_init_called' failed!
>
Hi Sudhir,
Thank you for making this app - for me this app works a little bit slow (my
phone is a Huawei Honor 5), but after cached the feeds it's quite usable.
For improvement I'd like to see if possible optional FAS ID login witch
helps to clarify the channels that I am interested, and the teams
After exiting from a remote SSH via terminal, I get
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 811: _dl_close: Assertion
`map->l_init_called' failed!
--
-- Steve
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 11:22 +, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > > > > Dear All,
> > > > > I have
> > > > > google-chrome-stable-54.0.2840.100-1.x86_64
> > > > > running on F25, but it deadlocks so often. Any solutions?
> > > > > Thanks in a
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>>> > > Dear All,
>>> > > I have
>>> > > google-chrome-stable-54.0.2840.100-1.x86_64
>>> > > running on F25, but it deadlocks so often. Any solutions?
>>> > > Thanks in advance,
>>>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
>> > > Dear All,
>> > > I have
>> > > google-chrome-stable-54.0.2840.100-1.x86_64
>> > > running on F25, but it deadlocks so often. Any solutions?
>> > > Thanks in advance,
>> >
>> > Can you describe the deadlock situation? Does it happe
24 matches
Mail list logo
