On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:30:54PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Fedora/RedHat's stance on btfs is "passive agressive" (Not Invented Here
> Syndrome).
That's absolutely not true. Fedora has wanted to use Btfs since... one
of the Boston FUDCons in 2008 or 2009. It's just never been ready,
which i
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> since 2009.
sorry, that should have read 2012. :)
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary
act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un Acto
Revolucionario
- Georg
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Saša Janiška wrote:
> At the moment I do use xfs/raid1, but considering to switch (back) to
> btrfs since simplifies setup having features of both lvm+raid.
>
Fedora/RedHat's stance on btfs is "passive agressive" (Not Invented Here
Syndrome).
I suggest you use S
I am only agree with what seems rational to me.
But, there are maybe things beyond this rationality that I cannot
peak.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université d
Roberto Ragusa writes:
> A separate /boot partition makes the boot process more powerful.
> For example, you can't encrypt the / filesytem if it has
> boot inside, as grub would not be able to read the kernel
> and the initrd.
Thanks…I was not thinking about e.g. encryption…installed F25 with
se
Rick Stevens writes:
> They could probably help more over there. That being said, I don't
> think btrfs on /boot is part of the plan for F25, although I could be
> wrong on that.
OK. I sill installed f25 with btrfs and separate /boot (raid1 setup). ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
One must deliver hims
/etc/dnf/dnf.conf!
i only checked yum.conf
sorry
no output: i have no modified repo-files.
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 14:49 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 11/07/2016 02:45 PM, che...@nosuchhost.net wrote:
> >
> > i did not disable any repo:
>
> Then you have excluded mediawiki. Revert
Silly me:
/etc/dnf/dnf.conf
there i had:
exclude=mediawiki
i completly forgot about that. thanks for helping.
yours josef
ps.: maybe dnf should list excludes
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 11/07/2016 02:20 AM, che...@nosuchhost.net wrote:
dnf list mediawiki
Last metadat
dnf list mediawiki
Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:26 ago on Mon Nov 7 21:52:23 2016.
Error: No matching Packages to list
but i found some errormessages in /var/log/dnf.log:
Nov 07 22:23:04 INFO --- logging initialized ---
Nov 07 22:23:04 DDEBUG timer: config: 4 ms
Nov 07 22:23:04 DEBUG cac
On 07/11/16 13:35, Rex Dieter wrote:
Patrick Dupre wrote:
Yes,
rpm -q qt-devel
qt-devel-4.8.7-18.fc24.x86_64
Even after a dnf reinstall qt-devel,
I still have the issue:
which qmake
/usr/bin/which: no qmake in
Use /usr/bin/qmake-qt4 or /qt4/bin/qmake
Just my 2 cents worth, I get the impres
On 11/07/2016 12:53 PM, che...@nosuchhost.net wrote:
i now disabled all repos and enabled only fedora+updates:
Try this, with your normal set of repos:
dnf list mediawiki
It should list the version you're currently using and any update that's
available.
_
i now disabled all repos and enabled only fedora+updates:
dnf clean all
19 files removed
dnf upgrade --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --enablerepo=updates
Fedora 24 - x86_64 - Updates
39 MB/s | 18 MB 00:00
Fedora 24 - x86_64
65 MB/s | 47 MB 00:00
Last metadata expiration check: 0
On 11/07/2016 02:45 PM, che...@nosuchhost.net wrote:
i did not disable any repo:
Then you have excluded mediawiki. Revert any dnf or repo config file changes. If you
are using default repo config files then you will be able to install mediawiki. It
is present on the mirror your dnf is reporti
i did not disable any repo:
dnf repolist gives:
Repo-id : fedora
Repo-name: Fedora 24 - x86_64
Repo-revision: 1465920474
Repo-updated : Tue Jun 14 18:07:53 2016
Repo-pkgs: 49,721
Repo-size: 50 G
Repo-metalink:
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-24&arch=x86_6
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Neal Becker said:
>> Clearly has something to do with libvirt, probably I did some experiment
>> a
>> long time back that required it. But just removing libvirt-daemon is not
>> an option, that would remove a lot of stuff.
>
> Libvirt by default sets up a
Once upon a time, Neal Becker said:
> Clearly has something to do with libvirt, probably I did some experiment a
> long time back that required it. But just removing libvirt-daemon is not an
> option, that would remove a lot of stuff.
Libvirt by default sets up a private local network, NATted
On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:23:21 -0500
Neal Becker wrote:
> I was interested in trying to configure a local dnsmasq, but when I tried to
> start it, I found out there was already one running, using port 53.
Libvirtd starts it when the default virtual network is setup to use NAT.
I use bridge for eve
I was interested in trying to configure a local dnsmasq, but when I tried to
start it, I found out there was already one running, using port 53.
I don't know who started it or why it's running, or if I really need it.
ps auxwww | grep dns
nobody1052 0.0 0.0 51124 1100 ?SNov04
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:33 AM, joev.8450 wrote:
> doesn't the nVidia installer uninstall everything nvidia before it
> installs the version in the invoked installer run file?
I wouldn't know as I always install everything from packages, and that's
what Mark is doing as well. For me, I use rpmf
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 09:33 -0500, joev.8450 wrote:
> doesn't the nVidia installer uninstall everything nvidia before it
> installs the version in the invoked installer run file? I mean is
> there
> something else I should invoke or do to make sure I've uninstalled
> everything nvidia? I'm having
doesn't the nVidia installer uninstall everything nvidia before it
installs the version in the invoked installer run file? I mean is there
something else I should invoke or do to make sure I've uninstalled
everything nvidia? I'm having somewhat of a similar problem but
re-running the installer wh
On 11/07/2016 02:20 AM, che...@nosuchhost.net wrote:
dnf list mediawiki
Last metadata expiration check: 1:25:32 ago on Mon Nov 7 07:51:20 2016.
Error: No matching Packages to list
You have disabled Fedora repositories. Why?
___
users mailing list --
typo on my side. the output is cut/paste, the actual commandline wasnt,
sorry.
if i only "dnf upgrade" without packages it get the same:
dnf upgrade
Last metadata expiration check: 1:23:09 ago on Mon Nov 7 07:51:20 2016.
Dependencies resolved.
Nothing to do.
Complete!
and even:
dnf list media
23 matches
Mail list logo
