Thanks. I will check
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 2:05 PM, stan wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:28:48 -0500
> Javier Perez wrote:
>
>
> > Has anyone had this problem?
>
> I haven't, but I don't lock my screen.
>
> > I am using Fedora 24, XFCE ( but I think something similar happened
> > also with KD
On 09/24/16 22:58, François Patte wrote:
> Le 24/09/2016 13:38, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>>
>> On 09/24/16 17:49, François Patte wrote:
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> I want to add an input method to ibus: so I created a new file in
>>> /usr/share/m17n and a new png icon in /usr/share/m17n/icons.
>>>
>>> I can
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:48:25 -0500
Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the packager for pdf-stapler in Fedora. I would like to make
> this available on EPEL so that CentOS, etc users may benefit. How do
> I do that?
I don't know the answer. But if you don't get an answer here, you
should try t
Hi,
I am the packager for pdf-stapler in Fedora. I would like to make this
available on EPEL so that CentOS, etc users may benefit. How do I do that?
Many thanks,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on
receipt. Please respond to the mailing list
> Looks like I'm suffering from the bug that was reported years ago, I am
> running the vanilla shell that exists in Fedora 24, looks like I will have
> to use an alternate Desktop Environment because I don't know why the
> gnome-shell has such horrible memory management that can consume up 6GB
> b
On 09/24/2016 12:02 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
You mention 3 files in
/usr/share/anacron
there are in /var/spool/anacron
in my machine
I am not sure that they control anything, maybe they monitor.
Those are the timestamp files mentioned in the man page. They tell the
program when it was last r
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:28:48 -0500
Javier Perez wrote:
> Has anyone had this problem?
I haven't, but I don't lock my screen.
> I am using Fedora 24, XFCE ( but I think something similar happened
> also with KDE.
> Linux 4.7.4-200
> Firefox 48.01
>
> How can I start troubleshooting this?
You
Hello,
I modified the file /etc/anacrontab
to have the some of "delay in minutes" and RANDOM_DELAY less than 60
and it seems that it helps. At least cron run on saturday as expected
You mention 3 files in
/usr/share/anacron
there are in /var/spool/anacron
in my machine
I am not sure that they
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 10:05:36AM +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It seems that we are experiencing different behaviours.
> It there any test that we could run to try to identify where the
> glitch is ?
>
> By the way, nobody told me how to control anacron.
> The installation day can no
On 09/24/2016 11:56 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:25 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
I note that the last line has "true" instead of "false", so maybe it
shouldn't have worked before and now is failing correctly ...
poc
Yes - that must be it.
Have you changed it to false, and
On 09/24/2016 10:44 AM, jd1008 wrote:
Secure Boot should prevent kernel-modifying rootkits, for one.
But old PC's do not have uefi in BIOS.
So it seems old pc's will not benefit from it???
The question was, "are there any benefits to UEFI?"
Will PCs that don't have UEFI benefit from UEFI f
On 09/24/2016 10:25 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
I don't know what the last means
It means that Red Hat cryptographically signs the grub bootloader, the
kernel, and kernel modules that ship with Fedora, and they won't be
loaded if they've been modified. A rootkit might modify the kernel, or
a
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:25 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> > I note that the last line has "true" instead of "false", so maybe it
> > shouldn't have worked before and now is failing correctly ...
> >
> > poc
> Yes - that must be it.
> Have you changed it to false, and run
> grub2-mkconfig
> and rebooted, a
On 09/24/2016 11:13 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 09/24/2016 08:35 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Is there any long-term advantage to install on EFI?
Secure Boot should prevent kernel-modifying rootkits, for one.
But old PC's do not have uefi in BIOS.
So it seems old pc's will not benefit from it
On 09/24/2016 10:22 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 10:10 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/24/2016 08:20 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:12:23 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:23 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/22/2016 05:24 PM, Patric
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:13:19 -0700 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 09/24/2016 08:35 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > Is there any long-term advantage to install on EFI?
>
>
> Secure Boot should prevent kernel-modifying rootkits, for one.
I don't know what the last means (sorry) but I have Secure Boot
On 09/24/2016 08:35 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Is there any long-term advantage to install on EFI?
Secure Boot should prevent kernel-modifying rootkits, for one.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to u
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 17:22:56 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 10:10 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> >
> > On 09/24/2016 08:20 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:12:23 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan"
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2016-09-23
Hi
Has anyone had this problem?
After I unolock the screen, firefox seem slow to recognize mouse or
keyboard input. There is a period of about three minutes where no matter
what I do it will not register with firefox (switch tabs, try to click on
link, etc.).
I can switch and move windows, and
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 10:10 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 09/24/2016 08:20 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:12:23 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan"
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:23 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 09/22/2016 05:24 PM, Patrick O'Cal
On 09/24/2016 08:20 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:12:23 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:23 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
On 09/22/2016 05:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I'm using kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64 with the proprietary NVidia
driver, plus
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 22:49:29 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> On 09/24/16 22:39, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> > I have an ASUS R503U which originally came with a Windoze8.1 installation.
> > I have no need for it so I scrapped it. I also, consequently have no need
> > for EFI.
> >
> > I was wondering
> What version of Fedora are you using?
F24 x86_64 (clean install). It doesn't use that much memory for me - I have 16
GB, and after a day or so it gets to as high as 2%, restarting gets it down to
about 0.8%. I got into the habit when the machine had less memory and it would
get up to around 1
Le 24/09/2016 13:38, Ed Greshko a écrit :
>
>
> On 09/24/16 17:49, François Patte wrote:
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I want to add an input method to ibus: so I created a new file in
>> /usr/share/m17n and a new png icon in /usr/share/m17n/icons.
>>
>> I can access this new input method in ibus preferences
On 09/24/16 22:39, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> I have an ASUS R503U which originally came with a Windoze8.1 installation. I
> have no need for it so I scrapped it. I also, consequently have no need for
> EFI.
>
> I was wondering if it is required for me to install Fedora 24 on an EFI
> system. I ca
Hi,
I have an ASUS R503U which originally came with a Windoze8.1 installation. I
have no need for it so I scrapped it. I also, consequently have no need for EFI.
I was wondering if it is required for me to install Fedora 24 on an EFI system.
I can not seem to get out of EFI so maybe what I am l
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:12:23 +0100 "Patrick O'Callaghan"
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:23 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
> >
> > On 09/22/2016 05:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm using kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64 with the proprietary NVidia
> > > driver, plus daily updates from the
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 12:21:54 +0200 Frank Elsner
wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:55:06 +0200 François Patte wrote:
> > Bonjour,
>
> Hello,
>
> > There is something wrong with this applet in f24: when the computer
> > resumes from suspend, the applet shows as if the network was not
> > connected
On 09/24/16 17:49, François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I want to add an input method to ibus: so I created a new file in
> /usr/share/m17n and a new png icon in /usr/share/m17n/icons.
>
> I can access this new input method in ibus preferences, but the icon of
> this input method is not displayed
>
>
>
> I don't HAVE to do it, I just like to keep the memory usage down. If
> there's supposed to be some kind of performance gain from the high usage, I
> don't see it - AFAICT it works just as well after the restart as before. If
> it's caching something it would be interesting to know what.
>
>
On 23 September 2016 at 20:37, Christian Stadelmann <
genodeft...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> This is a common issue with gnome-shell.
> 1. Can you try disabling any gnome-shell extension and see whether it is
> still present? If no, then one of your extensions is to blame. There is no
> easy way
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:55:06 +0200 François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
Hello,
> There is something wrong with this applet in f24: when the computer
> resumes from suspend, the applet shows as if the network was not
> connected. In fact it is connected but, it impossible to change the
> connection, i
Bonjour,
There is something wrong with this applet in f24: when the computer
resumes from suspend, the applet shows as if the network was not
connected. In fact it is connected but, it impossible to change the
connection, ie.: if before going to suspend, the computer was connected
on a wifi, it is
Bonjour,
I want to add an input method to ibus: so I created a new file in
/usr/share/m17n and a new png icon in /usr/share/m17n/icons.
I can access this new input method in ibus preferences, but the icon of
this input method is not displayed when I switch to my input method...
Only a gear is dis
On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:23 -0600, jd1008 wrote:
>
> On 09/22/2016 05:24 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > I'm using kernel-4.6.6-300.fc24.x86_64 with the proprietary NVidia
> > driver, plus daily updates from the stable repos. Hibernation used to
> > work with previous kernels, but now regu
On 09/24/2016 01:05 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
By the way, nobody told me how to control anacron.
The installation day can no be considered as a normal way to
control an application !
The first thing you should always do is RTFM. In this case:
man anacron
man anacrontab
___
Hello,
It seems that we are experiencing different behaviours.
It there any test that we could run to try to identify where the
glitch is ?
By the way, nobody told me how to control anacron.
The installation day can no be considered as a normal way to
control an application !
In may opinion, we
37 matches
Mail list logo
