Here is the latest stuff? And to me, it looks like the ports 20 and 21 should
be
open, but nmapfe is showing that 20 is closed? The firewall zones public.xml
seems to show it is opened, and the iptables-save output seems to show it
short be opened? So not clear what is making it show up as clos
Seemed to have it working by setting up the ports 20 and 21 in the firewall for
both tcp and udp, so copied the settings from machine r to real server. Then
it didn't work?? Did an nmapfe to the machine, and if either firewalld and/or
iptables is running the port 20 shows up as closed. Even thou
On 09/07/2016 08:26 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016 at 18:38, Mike Wright wrote:
Did just notice if I do the traceroute with -I option it doesn't give the !X?
Will
have to look into the difference between with -I and without??
traceroute -I says use ping to follow the connec
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:28:41 +0300, Hiisi wrote:
> 2016-08-29 11:58 GMT+03:00 Hiisi :
>
>
> Sorry for the noise! the problem solved. It happened that installing
> gcc49 worked for me. Followed this advice:
> https://www.pugetsystems.com/labs/hpc/Install-NVIDIA-CUDA-on-Fedora-22-
with-gcc-5-1-654
On 7 Sep 2016 at 18:38, Mike Wright wrote:
Subject:Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Mike Wright
Date sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 18:38:46 -0700
Send reply to: Com
Put the service file back the way it was.
It's best if you can identify which directories Joomla needs write access to
limit exposure.
For Wordpress it's
/path/to/wordpress/DocumentRoot/wp-content/{plugins,themes,upgrade,uploads} so:
rw_dirs="plugins themes upgrade uploads"
if you can't identif
You could run strace dnf install, and capture the hanging part to attach to
a bug report.
You could first do a dnf clean all. It's sort of a hammer but...
Chris Murphy
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.o
On 09/07/2016 05:26 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016 at 16:32, Mike Wright wrote:
1) ftp uses tcp
2) ftp uses port 21 in both ACTIVE and PASSIVE modes
3) ftp also uses port 20 in ACTIVE mode
I want to make sure I understand what is going on.
d7r is the fedora24 host, correct?
On Wed, 7 Sep 2016 15:49:41 -0700
Reynold DeMarco Jr wrote:
> When I run an install with dnf the program downloads the packages
> runs through transaction checks and begins the installation. When it
> is done with the installation it just freezes. In the past it would
> run through a verification
On 7 Sep 2016 at 16:32, Mike Wright wrote:
Subject:Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?
To: Community support for Fedora users
From: Mike Wright
Date sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:32:05 -0700
Send reply to: Com
On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I've set up a virtual host for a joomla website and having some
permissions problems
This is in docs.joomla.org:
"PHP Being Run as an Apache Module.
This causes ownership issues and thus permission problems which will
lead to security issues. It is be
On 09/07/2016 03:19 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/07/2016 01:38 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
>> On 09/07/2016 11:08 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>>> On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 09/07/2016 03:55 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 7 Sep 2016 at 13:50, Fred Smith wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:21 -0400
From: Fred Smith
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Issue with ftp making connect
On 7 Sep 2016 at 13:50, Fred Smith wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:21 -0400
From: Fred Smith
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject:Re: Issue with ftp making connection but not list?
Send reply to: Community su
When I run an install with dnf the program downloads the packages runs
through transaction checks and begins the installation. When it is done
with the installation it just freezes. In the past it would run through
a verification and clean up and then return to command prompt. Any ideas
on corr
On 09/07/2016 01:38 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
> On 09/07/2016 11:08 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote:
>> Hi,
On 09/07/2016 02:06 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Lennart Poettering has a hate for rc.local. He discusses that somewhere
in his systemd blog. For whatever reason, he dislikes it and thinks that
no-one should use it, or be able to use it. So you must sacrifice the
correct animal, at the exactly correc
Le 07/09/2016 23:06, R. G. Newbury a écrit :
> On 09/05/2016 05:07 AM, oe Zeff wrote:
>
>> Subject: Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED]
>> To: Community support for Fedora users
>> Message-ID: <57cc87ea.3090...@zeff.us>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>
>> On
On 09/07/2016 02:06 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Lennart Poettering has a hate for rc.local. He discusses that somewhere
in his systemd blog. For whatever reason, he dislikes it and thinks that
no-one should use it, or be able to use it. So you must sacrifice the
correct animal, at the exactly correc
On 09/05/2016 05:07 AM, oe Zeff wrote:
Subject: Re: unable to start rc-local.service[SOLVED]
To: Community support for Fedora users
Message-ID: <57cc87ea.3090...@zeff.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
On 09/04/2016 01:34 PM, François Patte wrote:
> Just unwanted spa
On 09/07/2016 02:03 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote:
Is there any counterpart of the old "yum check" where I can verify
everything is now ok?
I don't know what "yum check" did. What are you trying to verify?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options
Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> It seems to be trying to put everything back to F23. "rpm
>> -qa|sort" shows that almost all of the fc23 packages are paired
>> with fc24 packages, both of which are installed. Is there any
>> reason I can't just remove the redundant packages?
>>
> You probably have both fedo
On 09/07/2016 01:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
That's an excellent idea because dnf doesn't use the contents of
/etc/fedora-release, it uses the version of fedora-release.rpm. If you
have a dupe, it stops when it finds the older one and uses that. I
know, because I've been burned that way.
Me too, f
On 09/07/2016 01:32 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
You probably have both fedora-release packages installed. Remove the 23
one.
That's an excellent idea because dnf doesn't use the contents of
/etc/fedora-release, it uses the version of fedora-release.rpm. If you
have a dupe, it stops when it fin
On 09/07/2016 01:27 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote:
It seems to be trying to put everything back to F23. "rpm -qa|sort"
shows that almost all of the fc23 packages are paired with fc24
packages, both of which are installed. Is there any reason I can't just
remove the redundant packages?
dnf remove \*fc23\
On 09/07/2016 11:08 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've set up a virtual host for a joomla w
Samuel Sieb answered my plea for help. Thanks!
> First do "rpm --rebuilddb" to make sure the rpm database is consistent.
> Run "systemd-cat --version" to make sure you're currently running 229.
> If so, then do "rpm -e systemd-222-14". Then try the upgrade again.
I was running 229 (fc24) as you
On 09/07/2016 01:27 PM, CLOSE Dave wrote:
Samuel Sieb answered my plea for help. Thanks!
It seems to be trying to put everything back to F23. "rpm -qa|sort"
shows that almost all of the fc23 packages are paired with fc24
packages, both of which are installed. Is there any reason I can't just
remo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Martín Marqués
> wrote:
>> 2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III :
>>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300,
>>> Martín Marqués wrote:
Hi all,
Dependency failed for Cryptography Set
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Martín Marqués wrote:
> 2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III :
>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300,
>> Martín Marqués wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Dependency failed for Cryptography Setup for luks-.
>>> Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes
>>
On 09/07/2016 10:26 AM, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
>> On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I've set up a virtual host for a joomla website and having some
permissions problems. I'v
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:17:32AM +1000, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
>Everything was working till just the other day? I've done more testing,
>and it has something to do with firewalld and iptables.
>
>I found that if I traceroute to machines not running fedora 24 it
>complete, bu
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 01:25 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
>> On 09/06/2016 01:11 PM, Alex wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've set up a virtual host for a joomla website and having some
>>> permissions problems. I've seen numerous configurations online about
>>>
Everything was working till just the other day? I've done more testing, and it
has something to do with firewalld and iptables.
I found that if I traceroute to machines not running fedora 24 it complete, but
with fedora 24 machine I am getting !X
I stopped firewalld and iptables on machine d7t and
On 09/07/2016 07:18 AM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
Use ftp to transfer files, but just had issues today in which connection is
made and login works fine, but doing a ls or trying to download a file fails?
If you're behind NAT or a non-stateful firewall, you typically need to
use PASV. If th
2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300,
> Martín Marqués wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Dependency failed for Cryptography Setup for luks-.
>> Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes
>
>
> Those sound like systemd messages. You probably need to find
2016-09-07 11:01 GMT-03:00 Bruno Wolff III :
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300,
> Martín Marqués wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Dependency failed for Cryptography Setup for luks-.
>> Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes
>
>
> Those sound like systemd messages. You probably need to find
Use ftp to transfer files, but just had issues today in which connection is
made and login works fine, but doing a ls or trying to download a file fails?
Tried with passive on and off? Did use it just the other day. We did have
some power issues, since two of the Island main generators are down,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 10:36:29 -0300,
Martín Marqués wrote:
Hi all,
Dependency failed for Cryptography Setup for luks-.
Dependency failed for Encrypted Volumes
Those sound like systemd messages. You probably need to find out which
dependency failed and that should be a big clueto whic
Hi all,
I have my laptop with F23 with the root partition encrypted with luks,
working great for about a year already.
I had some pending upgrades which I applied today (kernel, glibc and
systemd are the ones that made me open my eyes wide).
The thing is that system starts booting, asks for the
I'm not sure if this is a Samba client issue, or an issue in Dolphin, so
I'm posting to the KDE and General users lists. Is anyone else connecting
to a Windows share and not being able to write to it from Dolphin?
I've got a handful of Windows servers that I regularly download items to my
Fedora
Same as for all gnome (Gtk+ 3.x) applications: use gnome-tweak-tool and change
the font size or the font scaling factor.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedo
42 matches
Mail list logo
