Re: application to listen to on-line broadcasts? [SOLVED]

2016-07-19 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 07/19/2016 04:26 PM, William Mattison wrote: I finally found time to do some more of this. (Samuel: I'm looking to go the pepper flash player + freshplayer route, not the old flash route.) Your choice, but that's definitely the harder route. First I looked in the places that I trust most

Re: application to listen to on-line broadcasts? [SOLVED]

2016-07-19 Thread William Mattison
I finally found time to do some more of this. (Samuel: I'm looking to go the pepper flash player + freshplayer route, not the old flash route.) First I looked in the places that I trust most. I used Fedora's "apper" to look for Chrome, Chromium, pepper, and freshplayer in the Fedora and rpmfus

Re: Fedora 24 and PNY SSD Problems

2016-07-19 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Sun, 2016-07-17 at 08:45 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > Everyone, > > I am trying to reclaim some use out of a couple old Compaq Presaio > SR1720NX machines for the office by adding some memory and a PNY 240 > GB > CS1311 SSD drives.  The bios was made by Phoenix; I did not identify > a > ver

Re: processes sates values

2016-07-19 Thread Angelo Moreschini
Ok thank you On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 07/18/2016 12:00 AM, Angelo Moreschini wrote: > >> What can be the connection from a program and his process >> >> ...What possibility I can have to know the name of a proces >> generate from a program ? >> >>

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/19/16 20:19, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 07/19/16 13:21, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 08:18 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: >>> Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox >>> from UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts is

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Timothy Murphy
Fred Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:00:25PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> Joachim Backes wrote: >> >> > I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual) replacement for >> > rpmfusion. >> >> What does "more actual" mean? >> Is it more likely to be compatible with CentOS and EPEL? > >

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread John Pilkington
On 19/07/16 14:08, Fred Smith wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:00:25PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: Joachim Backes wrote: I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual) replacement for rpmfusion. What does "more actual" mean? Is it more likely to be compatible with CentOS and EPEL? well,

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:00:25PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote: > Joachim Backes wrote: > > > I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual) replacement for rpmfusion. > > What does "more actual" mean? > Is it more likely to be compatible with CentOS and EPEL? well, I don't know what the OP mean

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Timothy Murphy
Joachim Backes wrote: > I'd say, UnitedRpms is a (better, more actual) replacement for rpmfusion. What does "more actual" mean? Is it more likely to be compatible with CentOS and EPEL? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin -- users mailing

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 14:29 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > The problem: I didn't find any (the VB version from UnitedRpms is > VirtualBox-5.0.20-1.fc24.x86_64), and the correspondent extpack version > from Oracle is > Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension_Pack-5.0.20-106931.vbox-extpack). But > there

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Joachim Backes
On 07/19/16 13:25, Ed Greshko wrote: On 07/19/16 14:18, Joachim Backes wrote: Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox from UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts iso files for a virtual CD/DVD. Devices as /dev/sr0 are not accepted. No such p

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Joachim Backes
On 07/19/16 13:21, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 08:18 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox from UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts iso files for a virtual CD/DVD. Devices as /dev/sr0 are

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Ed Greshko
On 07/19/16 14:18, Joachim Backes wrote: > Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox from > UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts iso files > for a virtual CD/DVD. Devices as /dev/sr0 are not accepted. > > No such problems with VB from oracle. >

Re: [OT] Usage of VirualBox from UnitedRpms for installing VB VM's in F24

2016-07-19 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 08:18 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Having problems to use a simple CD/DVD drive for the usage in VirtualBox > from UnitedRpms: The correspondent storage dialog only accepts iso files > for a virtual CD/DVD. Devices as /dev/sr0 are not accepted. I've no idea what UnitedRpm